New Firing sigth for C.A.S. Heli ?

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2007-12-04 17:56

Ok, my friend shoot me a link from youtube, showing AWESOME guner view for COBRA! The video description say it was Project Reality sight, but i know FLIR is a USI view... anyway. Just take a look, its AWESOME.

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=53_AJLTbnUo[/youtube]

Its look AWESOME who agreed

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-12-04 18:01

its project reality , with the cobra sigh edited .

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2007-12-04 18:17

USI got THERMAL FLIR for as gunner view... its a mix from PR and USI sight... its nice... done nicely its can add alot of realism to PR.

Ragni<RangersPL> · Post by **Ragni<RangersPL>** » 2007-12-04 18:37

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:its project reality , with the cobra sigh edited .

Yes it is from PR and yes it was edited.
Ammo counter doesn't work (it shows 240 rounds all the time)

It looks like a fake to me

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-12-04 18:47

I lol so hard about people in the comments thinking it's real.

markonymous · Post by **markonymous** » 2007-12-04 18:56

why make a video just to screw ppl?
dunno why it couldnt be real. its just colored textures...

edit: never mind i watched it more carefully. looks like a fake to me.

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2007-12-04 18:56

[R-PUB]bosco wrote:I lol so hard about people in the comments thinking it's real.

Thats prove DEV team is making a good job XD

SuperArmy · Post by **SuperArmy** » 2007-12-04 19:20

yeh that looks copied form a real footage from an Apache.

Viper5 · Post by **Viper5** » 2007-12-04 19:29

haha thats from PR. The guy sprinting across the road is yours truly IIRC.

CareBear · Post by **CareBear** » 2007-12-04 20:13

yer i remember the original, showing off the new cobra zooms etc, copied the vid that was on the internet somewhere, and then some 1 else has come along and edited it

Thunder · Post by **Thunder** » 2007-12-04 20:50

that clip was in a pr trailer, until people found it offensive as it mirrors a real life operation

Post by **Mongolian_dude** » 2007-12-04 21:06

[R-MOD]Thunder wrote:that clip was in a pr trailer, until people found it offensive as it mirrors a real life operation

Unlike PR, eh?

...mongol...

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2007-12-04 22:32

[R-MOD]Thunder wrote:that clip was in a pr trailer, until people found it offensive as it mirrors a real life operation

Are you serious LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
Its like to say since GTA3 and others have been released, drug dealing, street killing, and Gang warfare have been improved LOL.

Post by **Masaq** » 2007-12-05 03:03

Hotrod525 wrote:Are you serious LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
Its like to say since GTA3 and others have been released, drug dealing, street killing, and Gang warfare have been improved LOL.

Uh... no-one said that the trailer would increase deaths in Iraq. The objection to it was that it took a real-life incident and exactly replicated it, using the genuine voice-over.

I can fully understand why people might find that a little distasteful.

Swe_Olsson · Post by **Swe_Olsson** » 2007-12-05 09:32

if you look really closely, you can see masaq & mongol hiding underneath that truck..

Gyberg · Post by **Gyberg** » 2007-12-05 15:20

It is, as others have pointed out, an exact reinactment of an actual event. The pilot and gunner were court-martialled since wounded troops not returning fire shouldn't be considered as valid targets. (I might be wrong conserning the cort-martial but im 75% sure....)

Post by **Outlawz7** » 2007-12-05 15:24

Hotrod525 wrote:AWESOME

Hyperactive much?

Hotrod525 · Post by **Hotrod525** » 2007-12-05 15:28

Gyberg wrote:It is, as others have pointed out, an exact reinactment of an actual event. The pilot and gunner were court-martialled since wounded troops not returning fire shouldn't be considered as valid targets. (I might be wrong conserning the cort-martial but im 75% sure....)

Huuum... they where active combatant ? They can be engaged no ?

I just try to figure it out in my head... You're in the desert of Irak... you seen hostile...they dont fire at you... what are you suppose to do ? Get back to base and forgot what you seen ?

I know ROE autorise you to engage civilian if they represent's an eminant treath to you or you're unit. ( Canadian kill civilian on a CheckPoint cause they dont stop and try to pass trought. 2 kids... what a waste...) So Why it would not let you engage hostile cause they dont shoot at you ?

Post by **Outlawz7** » 2007-12-05 15:32

I know ROE autorise you to engage civilian if they represent's an eminant treath to you or you're unit.

1. Tons of grammar/spell errors.

2. How can a civilian be a threat?

Gyberg · Post by **Gyberg** » 2007-12-05 15:35

Hotrod525 wrote:I just try to figure it out in my head... You're in the desert of Irak... you seen hostile...they dont fire at you... what are you suppose to do ? Get back to base and forgot what you seen ?

You didn't read did you? I said wounded... They fired at them, he goes down, is still moving but wounded and they say something like: hit them again... that is were it all goes wrong...