Stryker variants?
-
Cascyth
- Posts: 144
- Joined: 2007-02-11 18:28
Stryker variants?
My question is: are there any plans for implementing various models of Stryker, like it is done with HMMWVs?
My curiosity is based on Wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stryker#Variants
Imagine using those on more advanced and larger maps (in the future of PR?):
- mobile command post (it could act as a support truck, just to make them different for each faction - M1130)
- my fave MGS ( M1128 )
My curiosity is based on Wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stryker#Variants
Imagine using those on more advanced and larger maps (in the future of PR?):
- mobile command post (it could act as a support truck, just to make them different for each faction - M1130)
- my fave MGS ( M1128 )
Last edited by Cascyth on 2007-12-08 13:41, edited 1 time in total.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
-
Mongolian_dude
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 6088
- Joined: 2006-10-22 22:24
-
MikeAP
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 2005-11-23 14:32
1st - MGS is being used by 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division. They're the first ones to field it , currently in Baqubah.
Each Infantry Company has 3x Infantry Platoons and 1x MGS Platoon. An MGS Platoon has 2 Infantry Variants and 2 MGS Variants. So figure each Company has 2 MGS trucks.
2nd - Why the hell would you want the Command Variant. Its just an Infantry Carrier thats got some high tech satelite equipment in it. No biggie.
Each Infantry Company has 3x Infantry Platoons and 1x MGS Platoon. An MGS Platoon has 2 Infantry Variants and 2 MGS Variants. So figure each Company has 2 MGS trucks.
2nd - Why the hell would you want the Command Variant. Its just an Infantry Carrier thats got some high tech satelite equipment in it. No biggie.
Me and my men - Baghdad 07'
-
Cascyth
- Posts: 144
- Joined: 2007-02-11 18:28
Just to make substitutes for trucks, for some diversity.[R-CON]MikeAP wrote: 2nd - Why the hell would you want the Command Variant. Its just an Infantry Carrier thats got some high tech satelite equipment in it. No biggie.
This is definitely NOT a must-have, but an optional idea for later PR releases.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
-
Mongolian_dude
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 6088
- Joined: 2006-10-22 22:24
[R-CON]MikeAP wrote: 2nd - Why the hell would you want the Command Variant. Its just an Infantry Carrier thats got some high tech satelite equipment in it. No biggie.
Could be used as a vehicle for the commander?
Just a fantasy really
...mongol...
Military lawyers engaged in fierce legal action.
[INDENT][INDENT]
[/INDENT][/INDENT]-
Viper5
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18
Jeezum, about 5 minutes after reading this something popped up on the local news about a Sergeant from a nearby town being killed in Baqubah[R-CON]MikeAP wrote:1st - MGS is being used by 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division. They're the first ones to field it , currently in Baqubah.
Each Infantry Company has 3x Infantry Platoons and 1x MGS Platoon. An MGS Platoon has 2 Infantry Variants and 2 MGS Variants. So figure each Company has 2 MGS trucks.
2nd - Why the hell would you want the Command Variant. Its just an Infantry Carrier thats got some high tech satelite equipment in it. No biggie.
-
supahpingi
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10
We should use the engineering version to heap up sand.
like this: if u drive forward and u press the left mouse button,then after a couple of meter driving a heap of sand shows up.
Or maybe let in work in an other way but i cant think of something right now.
A heap of sand might be perfect for cover for tanks.
like this: if u drive forward and u press the left mouse button,then after a couple of meter driving a heap of sand shows up.
Or maybe let in work in an other way but i cant think of something right now.
A heap of sand might be perfect for cover for tanks.
-
charliegrs
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 2007-01-17 02:19
-
BetterDeadThanRed
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 2007-02-12 02:30

