[Gameplay] Commander assets

dbzao
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9381
Joined: 2006-06-08 19:13

[Gameplay] Commander assets

Post by dbzao »

Well, I don't have any pictures or videos about this update :p , but it's a good gameplay change and I think you guys will like to hear about it.

With the addition of cmdr assets in v0.6, we gave the Commander a more decisive role in keeping the team focused and advancing by building bunkers, firebases and other smaller assets.

The problem we noticed was that the Commander started behaving more like a construction worker instead of a strategist that plans ahead, talk to squads and guide his team.

To help in that area we worked on giving the Squad Leaders the ability to place the assets for the Commander, without him being present at the construction site.

To keep some control in the hands of the Commander, bunkers and firebases need approval from him, while other assets can be built once one of these assets is constructed in the area.

We also simplified the cmdr assets rules to help with that task:

- All assets need a support truck close to be deployed.

- Bunkers and firebases have the same rules: "you can build one for every 2 CPs your team owns".

- Command post and AA guns are deployed in a full health state.

- Sandbags, razorwire and AA gun can only be placed near bunkers and firebases.

- Trucks are no longer a cmdr deployable, they spawn at the command post (like the jeeps in the bunkers/firebases) and main bases.

- Zero ticket costs for building cmdr assets.


Squad Leaders with a support truck close-by and an officer kit can request a build order from the Commander, and once that build order is approved and the other rules are met, he can deploy a bunker or firebase within 100m of that order.

After the bunker or firebase is deployed, the Squad Leader can place the other smaller assets without approval from the Commander.

So we think all these changes combined will improve the Commander role, keeping him in control of the major decisions but giving him freedom to delegate some of the work for his squads.

If everything goes bad, he can still go and deploy the assets by himself, but it's good to have that new option.
MAINERROR
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1873
Joined: 2007-07-22 17:54

Post by MAINERROR »

That's pretty cool.
Smegburt_funkledink
Posts: 4080
Joined: 2007-11-29 00:29

Post by Smegburt_funkledink »

Yeah man, brilliant ideas. It can get quite annoying when your newbie commander likes to spend tickets on assets in the line of fire that just keep getting blown up.
Also, the nuber of times an SL has needed a bunker/FB and the CO didn't have a mic', this should be a great help.
Nice one chaps.
[out]
Oldirti
Posts: 310
Joined: 2007-08-06 14:37

Post by Oldirti »

Are we going to see this before the New Year or come the .7 full release?
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

Oldirti wrote:Are we going to see this before the New Year or come the .7 full release?
dont ask for any date information as we are not going to give it out.
Image
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

^ He has his 'sources' I thought?
Anyway, great news ;)
Image
Oldirti
Posts: 310
Joined: 2007-08-06 14:37

Post by Oldirti »

[R-PUB]bosco wrote:^ He has his 'sources' I thought?
Anyway, great news ;)
*squints eyes* You don't want to make an enemy out of me.

Sorry won't ask again :grin:
hx.bjoffe
Posts: 1062
Joined: 2007-02-26 15:05

Post by hx.bjoffe »

'[R-DEV wrote:dbzao;547330']
- All assets need a support truck close to be deployed.
You are removing the repair jeep ability, or didn't care to mention it?
'[R-DEV wrote:dbzao;547330']
- Zero ticket costs for building cmdr assets.
Really? They still generate tickets though?
'[R-DEV wrote:dbzao;547330']
After the bunker or firebase is deployed, the Squad Leader can place the other smaller assets without approval from the Commander.
I've been sceptical to these suggestions, but it will be exciting to see how this works out...
Wellink
Posts: 158
Joined: 2007-05-10 14:08

Post by Wellink »

are placable tows and/or machineguns be aviable in 0.7 would love that!
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

Yeah, if zero ticket cost, then they should not generate more.
Image
Hotrod525
Posts: 2215
Joined: 2006-12-10 13:28

Post by Hotrod525 »

i have a question... is it possible to got a map whit only a MEC base at start ? like a desert, whit in a corner (realy realy far away...) you will have an Airport of Mec...and in the opposite corner... you will have a whole US convoy, Commander truck, Tank, AAV, APC,HMMWV... Commander & engineer would have to establish the Camp in the desert it will become our uncap point... I know it can sound weird but... its realist :D

Photo of convoy enterring Irak in 2003;
Photo 1
Photo 2
Photo 3
Last edited by Hotrod525 on 2007-12-11 15:44, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Smuke
Posts: 877
Joined: 2007-09-25 16:21

Post by Smuke »

looks great guys.

Good thinking
Image
In-Game Name: SmukeUK
Wild_Bill: Smuke, you are a true ninja!.
SethLive!
Posts: 1582
Joined: 2007-02-10 22:46

Post by SethLive! »

very good changes IMO
Image
Someone please tell me that the above is irony.
Or I'll rip my own eyes out with a sardine.
-[R-Mod] Masaq
MadTommy
Posts: 2220
Joined: 2006-05-23 11:34

Post by MadTommy »

hmmm sounds like it leaves the commander with no fun at all.

Edit: but i didn't read the last line.

At least building assets was a nice break from hearding cats.

But it adds the SL role, which is nice. :)
Last edited by MadTommy on 2007-12-11 17:10, edited 1 time in total.
Farks
Posts: 2069
Joined: 2007-01-20 00:08

Post by Farks »

This sounds good. Now the commander may actully have time to command the team. :p
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

I like it just dont wnat to see spaming.
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
Wolfe
Posts: 1057
Joined: 2007-03-06 03:15

Post by Wolfe »

'[R-DEV wrote:dbzao;547330'][spawn] like the jeeps in the bunkers/firebases....
infantry spawn + vehicle spawn + same location = dead infantry

It happens too often; a soldier spawns, takes cover, or reloads his weapon near the bunker as a vehicle suddenly spawns and kills him.

Suggestion A:
If vehicles are to spawn at bunkers, then move the vehicle spawn-in location away from the bunker entrance to help decrease the chance of a needless death.

Suggestion B:
Vehicles no longer spawn at the infantry bunker. Instead, a new commander asset can be deployed: the vehicle depot. Here, transportation vehicles are repaired, rearmed, and requested "on demand" as you would a weapon. The vehicle then spawns safely and better yet, reliably, when you need it.

[edited quote for clarity]
Last edited by Wolfe on 2007-12-11 21:06, edited 1 time in total.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

Wolfe wrote:It happens too often; a soldier spawns, takes cover, or reloads his weapon near the bunker as a vehicle suddenly spawns and kills him.


The command post is not a spawn point when i last checked...
Image
Masaq
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 10043
Joined: 2006-09-23 16:29

Post by Masaq »

MadTommy wrote:hmmm sounds like it leaves the commander with no fun at all.

Edit: but i didn't read the last line.

At least building assets was a nice break from hearding cats.

But it adds the SL role, which is nice. :)
Whooo! My phrase is catching on!

Can we get "Commander" renamed to "Cat Herder" please? :D


Edit: oh, and it'll be interesting to see how this pans out... Certainly a good commander will be able to start using assets as a way of rewarding squads who do what they should be doing, which'll be good.

"That's how it starts, Mas, with that warm happy feeling inside. Pretty soon you're rocking in the corner, a full grown dog addict, wondering where your next St Bernand is coming from..." - IAJTHOMAS
"Did they say what he's angry about?" asked Annette Mitchell, 77, of the district, stranded after seeing a double feature of "Piranha 3D" and "The Last Exorcism." - Washington Post
Locked

Return to “2007”