[Map] Fallujah West [WIP]

Wasteland
Posts: 4611
Joined: 2006-11-07 04:44

Post by Wasteland »

Outlawz wrote:Oh please, because the Apache can't accelerate to jet speed and quickly turn away or just rape every vehicles before they are used. And give me a break, it's a 1 km map, even in vBF2 1 Km maps don't have air assets.
1 km map: that's the same as OGT, right? I'd say that OGT is plenty big enough to support having an AH-6.
Originally Posted by: ArmedDrunk&Angry
we don't live in your fantastical world where you are the super hero sent to release us all from the bondage of ignorance
Originally Posted by: [R-MOD]dunehunter
don't mess with wasteland, a scary guy will drag you into an alleyway and rape you with a baseballbat
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

I see your point Wasteland, but mine is that MH/AH6s are used by a single aviation regiment in the entire US Armed Forces. They have about 30-40 of them I'd estimate and they would never be used on something like a conventional assault where regular helos are fine.
USMC[KILLER]
Posts: 142
Joined: 2005-05-03 01:00

Post by USMC[KILLER] »

If the Marines are going to be in this map it'd be nice if they get lav's or aav's since there won't be any tanks. Its just a suggestion ;)
Image
100% Polish & Proud

Alpha SquadPvt. Polak Echo Company, 2nd Battalion 7th Marine Regiment
1st Marine Division
USMC
Wasteland
Posts: 4611
Joined: 2006-11-07 04:44

Post by Wasteland »

[R-PUB]Viper5 wrote:I see your point Wasteland, but mine is that MH/AH6s are used by a single aviation regiment in the entire US Armed Forces. They have about 30-40 of them I'd estimate and they would never be used on something like a conventional assault where regular helos are fine.
Yeah, that's true. It probably wouldn't be used for a full conventional assault. But Mogadishu (hahaha, I know) AH-6s were used because it was believed that a gunship was too powerful a show of force. Depending on what stage of the Fallujah operation this map represents, couldn't that also be the case here?

That argument is really just to satisfy the reality-philes.

I'm much more interested in fun, tactical, realistic gameplay to be honest. I think that having something small like an AH-6 would be nice because it keeps out the WTFPWNXx0rxx1337 types who seem to love cobras, and because it keeps the cobra (or apache for that matter) from being able to rape the enemy too hard. I think gunships are kind of overkill on unconventional maps without significant tree cover.
Originally Posted by: ArmedDrunk&Angry
we don't live in your fantastical world where you are the super hero sent to release us all from the bondage of ignorance
Originally Posted by: [R-MOD]dunehunter
don't mess with wasteland, a scary guy will drag you into an alleyway and rape you with a baseballbat
[uBp]Irish
Posts: 1794
Joined: 2007-01-17 23:47

Post by [uBp]Irish »

i personally wish there were still tanks in this map since it's nice and closed in but /sigh.... APCs just die too fast even with infantry support. they're just a target for some trigger happy RPG gunner.
Image
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

[R-MOD]Wasteland wrote:Yeah, that's true. It probably wouldn't be used for a full conventional assault. But Mogadishu (hahaha, I know) AH-6s were used because it was believed that a gunship was too powerful a show of force. Depending on what stage of the Fallujah operation this map represents, couldn't that also be the case here?

That argument is really just to satisfy the reality-philes.

I'm much more interested in fun, tactical, realistic gameplay to be honest. I think that having something small like an AH-6 would be nice because it keeps out the WTFPWNXx0rxx1337 types who seem to love cobras, and because it keeps the cobra (or apache for that matter) from being able to rape the enemy too hard. I think gunships are kind of overkill on unconventional maps without significant tree cover.
We could always find another light gunship for the Marines... No idea what that'd be tho... :roll:

But yeah I get your point. Though Mogadishu is because all transport was via the 160th and all units were SOCOM Whereas the Army/Marines would use regular Aviation units
IronTaxi
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4925
Joined: 2006-05-31 12:56

Post by IronTaxi »

'[uBp wrote:Irish;548779'] APCs just die too fast even with infantry support. they're just a target for some trigger happy RPG gunner.

i beg to differ... played an entire round the other day of basrah with an APC convoy and only lost 2 apcs the whole round...

with infantry support..
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

[R-DEV]IronTaxi wrote:i beg to differ... played an entire round the other day of basrah with an APC convoy and only lost 2 apcs the whole round...

with infantry support..
ye, when APCs are used in the correct way they are by far one of the most deadly weapons in a urban envorimant, + also very effective outside urban areas too :D
Image
Sadist_Cain
Posts: 1208
Joined: 2007-08-22 14:47

Post by Sadist_Cain »

Tis just knowing how to make infatry and apc work together effectively thats the key ;) its more than just a taxi with a gun.

Do these new maps mean we'll have more elaborate buildings in 0.7? keep looking at unopenable doors and wishing I could hide in there, house clearing could be a lot more interesting too. I see you mentioned lotsa breachable entrances etc. does that mean this too?
Image
[uBp]Irish
Posts: 1794
Joined: 2007-01-17 23:47

Post by [uBp]Irish »

Taxi, where were you playing?
Image
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Post by Maxfragg »

why wouldn't you guys be happy with a UH-1N as helo on this map ??
USMC[KILLER]
Posts: 142
Joined: 2005-05-03 01:00

Post by USMC[KILLER] »

Maxfragg wrote:why wouldn't you guys be happy with a UH-1N as helo on this map ??
I'd love to see the UH-1N on that map. It could be used as a gunship too?
Image
100% Polish & Proud

Alpha SquadPvt. Polak Echo Company, 2nd Battalion 7th Marine Regiment
1st Marine Division
USMC
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

I can tell you that the map has a 70% chance of being the US Army when its done as there will be a grater need for US Army maps than USMC when the US Army is done.

Which ever team it is, it will most likely be the team that needs more maps. end of discussion.
Image
jayceon515
Posts: 436
Joined: 2007-07-24 14:19

Post by jayceon515 »

US Army :grin: :33_love:
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Post by Maxfragg »

well, the point is, Army => Blackhawks, USMC => Huey.
so i can not tell, which branch i would like to see more on this map
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

I very much doubt there will be any choppers on this map, for your urban chopper combat you will have to look out for muttrah ;)
Image
duckhunt
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3314
Joined: 2005-08-28 18:20

Post by duckhunt »

Probably USMC, as US Army will be used for larger combined armed battles.

Thisl be simple, usmc vs insurgents, maybe a couple humvees thats it.

Like rhino said, muutrah will be for the cool flying down the streets and stuff. Not this.
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

sweet can we get both togather maybe in 0.8?
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Post by gazzthompson »

what will be the range of the M4?
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

You can't have 2 factions on the same team, Soucy, plus the Devs are dividing the US Army and Marines. Just make another Insurgency map with US Army and keep this one with Marines.
Image
Locked

Return to “2007”