PR M16A4 on CDG.net!!

Post by **Hitperson** » 2007-12-14 15:46

for all you guys that play css take a look see!!

http://cdg.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=7208122#7208122
awesomeness.

Jedimushroom · Post by **Jedimushroom** » 2007-12-14 15:54

F*** Yeah Seaking!

EDIT: Make it for the M4A1

Post by **Hitperson** » 2007-12-14 16:37

this isn't FPSbanana.

G.Drew · Post by **G.Drew** » 2007-12-14 17:03

look for the Dev Journal guys in announcements, its all there

Post by **Rhino** » 2007-12-14 17:05

I also love how our M16 in the HL2 engine looks soo much nicer than the Insurgancy one

Insurgancy

PRs

Post by **Hitperson** » 2007-12-14 17:14

just a shame the dust cover doesn't open

Post by **Jaymz** » 2007-12-14 18:15

Hitperson wrote:just a shame the dust cover doesn't open

Post by **Hitperson** » 2007-12-14 21:40

lol at the nit picking picture.

anyway i was just making an observation.

the bolt would have been nicer to look at mobile or not.

WNxKenwayy · Post by **WNxKenwayy** » 2007-12-14 22:09

Still missing the small metal nipple thing that is on the end of the bolt release latch. Its used to lock the bolt to the rear. kkthxbi.

pasfreak · Post by **pasfreak** » 2007-12-15 02:24

i dont see any of those retention clips on the handguards

looks good tho

Desertfox · Post by **Desertfox** » 2007-12-15 03:03

I see no foregrip! This is blasphemy!

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-12-15 03:22

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:I also love how our M16 in the HL2 engine looks soo much nicer than the Insurgancy one

From a technical point of view, maybe. But the insurgency one wins back serious cool points for having proper hand guards and not the tacticool (and ugly as hell) picatinny rail/short grip cover doubled up look on the PR one.

Oldirti · Post by **Oldirti** » 2007-12-15 03:34

[R-MOD]Bob_Marley wrote:From a technical point of view, maybe. But the insurgency one wins back serious cool points for having proper hand guards and not the tacticool (and ugly as hell) picatinny rail/short grip cover doubled up look on the PR one.

What does that even mean?

pasfreak · Post by **pasfreak** » 2007-12-15 05:39

i guess he means m16a2 style handguards?

that's pretty much the older m16a4s
the most recent ones have the full rail handguard made by kac
does add some weight tho, but who cares you can put all this cool stuff on
that adds even more weight lol

Post by **Katarn** » 2007-12-15 17:39

Hitperson wrote:just a shame the dust cover doesn't open

Someone was too lazy to that on the compile, not mai fault.

Rambo Hunter · Post by **Rambo Hunter** » 2007-12-15 17:44

[R-MOD]Bob_Marley wrote:From a technical point of view, maybe. But the insurgency one wins back serious cool points for having proper hand guards and not the tacticool (and ugly as hell) picatinny rail/short grip cover doubled up look on the PR one.

I thought M5 RAS was standard issue for the USMC M16A4?

hall0 · Post by **hall0** » 2007-12-15 18:29

'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino;550078']I also love how our M16 in the HL2 engine looks soo much nicer than the Insurgancy one

Insurgancy

...

Yap it looks better but this isnt the Insurgency 16a4, this one looks more like a m16a2 and this version isnt in Insurgency.

This is the Insurgency M16a4

Rambo Hunter · Post by **Rambo Hunter** » 2007-12-15 18:40

That pic just makes ours look even better

Jedimushroom · Post by **Jedimushroom** » 2007-12-15 23:00

I'm going to say it once more.

Make it for the M4.

Otherwise I shall scream and scream and scream until I am sick.

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-12-16 00:31

Rambo Hunter wrote:I thought M5 RAS was standard issue for the USMC M16A4?

That doesn't stop it from being ugly.