0.7 details on tacticalgamer.com

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Post Reply
smuggly517
Posts: 29
Joined: 2007-11-24 20:52

0.7 details on tacticalgamer.com

Post by smuggly517 »

heres some details on 0.7 I found on tacticalgamer.com
http://www.tacticalgamer.com/tactical-g ... 0-7-a.html
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

but even more secret 0.7 details can be found on the TG server its self...just have to know who to talk to ... ;)
Rico
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1345
Joined: 2004-08-06 16:28

Post by Rico »

Hmm where did they get that from?
CareBear
Posts: 4036
Joined: 2007-04-19 17:41

Post by CareBear »

all that info is on the wiki, many people are already way ahead :-P
Image
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Post by Bob_Marley »

Requesting permission to ban all testers as a precation. :p
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Ragni<RangersPL>
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2007-08-13 10:44

Post by Ragni<RangersPL> »

ImageRANGERS LEAD THE WAY!!!
:29_slaps: Do not post stupid suggestions just because you had a bad round in PR :fryingpan
Hail_831
Posts: 128
Joined: 2006-05-23 01:09

Post by Hail_831 »

cool hope its true
Image
Rico
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1345
Joined: 2004-08-06 16:28

Post by Rico »

Well if its on the wiki I guess I can comment - there is some truth to it ;)
Brummy
Posts: 7479
Joined: 2007-06-03 18:54

Post by Brummy »

[R-MOD]Bob_Marley wrote:Requesting permission to ban all testers as a precation. :p
Permission denied, over.
G.Drew
Posts: 4417
Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02

Post by G.Drew »

brummy.uk wrote:Permission denied, over.
yknow he will probably have blown up something close to u with a JDAM by now ;)
Image
Image

[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

Not sure where they got some of the info from, specifically the things regarding "Tactical Gamer leading the way" and "Operation barracuda"
ConscriptVirus
Posts: 489
Joined: 2006-12-18 04:02

Post by ConscriptVirus »

no hud? someone explain!
Image
"These things we do that others may live"
smuggly517
Posts: 29
Joined: 2007-11-24 20:52

Post by smuggly517 »

[R-PUB]Viper5 wrote:Not sure where they got some of the info from, specifically the things regarding "Tactical Gamer leading the way" and "Operation barracuda"
what about operation barracuda ;-)
Nickbond592
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2713
Joined: 2007-01-30 18:16

Post by Nickbond592 »

operation barracuda is Sh*t hot, Dr Rank has been working overtime on it and its amazing.

I cant wait :D
Image


Smeg: Fuzz commands a lot and promotes good teamwork, db flips vehicles, Bosco is an all-round nub, Outlawz is an SP whore, Nickbond is a friggin ninja and Rhino gets kicked for being a n00b.
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

and will NOT be in 0.7
















this is just a guess based on comments made in the 0.7 input thread by a DEV but becuase many comments made in that thread do not fit with the recent release information, one cannot be sure that Op Bara. WILL NOT be in 0.7!

However one can say with a greater degree of CERTAINTY that Fools Road, Op Archer and Big chinese map (got to learn to spell that one) WILL BE IN 0.7
GR34
Posts: 471
Joined: 2007-04-07 03:08

Post by GR34 »

Cool info. But I hate the Idea of Rifleman with Iron sights! Maby for the US army faction Rifleman Iron can get an Aim point?
In game name Joshey
Image
Image
Rico
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1345
Joined: 2004-08-06 16:28

Post by Rico »

ConscriptVirus wrote:no hud? someone explain!

The HUD clutter has been reduced. I can't go into much detail now but all will be revealed soon enough.
markonymous
Posts: 1358
Joined: 2007-10-25 05:20

Post by markonymous »

sound kinda unreal having riflemen without ammo with ACOGs and riflemen with ammo with ironsights. Why would an army do that? the acog is so heavy he cant carry the extra ammo i mean god... sound like a shitty compromise, like if the kit is to good make it into two crappy versions and youre done.
ConscriptVirus
Posts: 489
Joined: 2006-12-18 04:02

Post by ConscriptVirus »

probably for balance reasons. like if i were to choose one of two guns (m16 w/ acog and m16 with iron sights) id choose the M16 w/ Acog. and if everyone were like me, we'd have no one with ironsights. but those who like bags of ammo, will choose the one with iron sights.

btw Rico, you were founder of TotalBF2? i thought that was Gamewizard or something.
Image
"These things we do that others may live"
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”