More US vs INS maps!

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

More US vs INS maps!

Post by LtSoucy »

If you look at the list you will see the US only face off with PLA or MEC factions. We want INS forces vs the mighty USMC!

7 Gates(GB vs PLA)
Al Basrah(GB vs INS)
Al Kufrah Oilfields(GB vs MEC)
Assault on Mestia(GB vs Militia)
Bi Ming(GB vs PLA)
Daqing Oilfields(USMC vs PLA)
EJod Desert(USMC vs MEC)
Fools Road(GB vs Militia)
Gulf of Oman(USMC vs MEC)
Hills of Hamgyong(USMC vs PLA)
Jabal Al-Burj(USMC vs MEC)
Kashan Desert(USMC vs MEC)
Operation Ghost Train(GB vs PLA)
Qwai River(USMC vs PLA)
Road to Kyongan'Ni(USMC vs PLA)
Sunset City(USMC vs PLA)
The Battle of Qinling(GB vs PLA)
Zatar Wetlands(USMC vs MEC)

Total maps:
8 British
8 USMC
9 PLA
6 MEC
1 INS
2 Militia

As you can see most of the British maps are made in 0.6 or 0.7. Only GB faces the INS or militia factions. Al BAsrah shoudl be given back to US with GB pull out of Iraq. And make another few INS of Militia maps that can go for US or GB forces. The US face off with most INS forces. So hwy have GB use the only INS map in PR?


P.S. :D ont spam this thread with British are better and just plain spam.
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

One word: Fallujah ;)
Image
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

Two Words:
Al Fallujah ;)

And another project that may/may not be underway :P
Doom721
Posts: 503
Joined: 2006-07-30 13:32

Post by Doom721 »

Yeah I noticed that... but heck what do you get when a bunch of british guys are developing all the maps and content!

It isn't project reality incorporating the full US forces in all its glory!
Its for that other place.... some island full of crazy guys who have this complicated tea time and driving on the wrong side of the road and some metric system BAH

Yeah I was hoping for operation archer, and vouched for a later release date of .7 but neither of those came true :P Guess I will wait
Image
"FAIL" - Right after you drive on the grass in Gran Turismo 4
Playing PR since Halo dropping spec ops and SL spawn ;) ( .3 :razz: )
Proud Member of the ~6 player PR clan StrkTm
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

@Viper: Maybe the Guide knows more, maybe... :P
Image
X1 Spriggan
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 427
Joined: 2007-08-31 04:24

Post by X1 Spriggan »

Operation Archer
[T]Terranova7
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28

Post by [T]Terranova7 »

And out of that list, it seems like the Brits have the highest quality maps with the exception of Qwai, Kashan, Jabal and EJOD.

But yeah, U.S could use some maps against Insurgents and Militia, right now both are non-existent. I know Fallujah map is in the works, now all we need is a U.S v.s Militia map.
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

Terranova wrote:And out of that list, it seems like the Brits have the highest quality maps with the exception of Qwai, Kashan, Jabal and EJOD.

But yeah, U.S could use some maps against Insurgents and Militia, right now both are non-existent. I know Fallujah map is in the works, now all we need is a U.S v.s Militia map.
A possible ;) to that. Still working out details.

Operation Archer was apparently cut according to the mapper who made it because it supposedly wasnt good enough, which is complete and utter bullshit. Was far and away the most beautiful, well made, best gameplay that .7 was to offer. I think he is still planning on releasing it independently.
BloodBane611
Posts: 6576
Joined: 2007-11-14 23:31

Post by BloodBane611 »

I agree. If I can ever figure out the editor I might convince myself to spend several hundred hours making a map.
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1"
-CJ-
Posts: 207
Joined: 2007-09-22 19:18

Post by -CJ- »

Yeah, we need more US and insurgents map. All US map are old map from BF2. All map running now are British map. For insurgents, we need a AAS map.

PS: I want Helmand back !
Razick
Posts: 397
Joined: 2007-12-04 01:46

Post by Razick »

I dont think US vs Militia is ever gonna happen because the scenario has it that the british are tasked with fighting them. But just be patient guys you gotta remember whats on the horizon: Al Fallujah, Muttrah 2.0 :mrgreen: , and BARRACUDA!!!!!! If everything goes according to plan with the DEVs, the 0.8 release will be epic. But for now lets just give them a break they deserve it. 8)
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

BARRACUDA
:British map
Al Fallujah
:ill give you guys that 1. But still its only 1 map.
Muttrah 2.0
:Its a USMC vs MEC map

And anyone think Al Basrah should be given to the US forces with the British pull out of Iraq. And I do think all those horrible BF2 maps should be removed. And the US maps are more based so the US can barely win.
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
ZaZZo
Posts: 1494
Joined: 2007-02-03 18:37

Post by ZaZZo »

Al Basrah was handed over to the Iraqi army amirite?
Nickbond592
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2713
Joined: 2007-01-30 18:16

Post by Nickbond592 »

yurp with a contingent of brits stying for training / backup purposes
Image


Smeg: Fuzz commands a lot and promotes good teamwork, db flips vehicles, Bosco is an all-round nub, Outlawz is an SP whore, Nickbond is a friggin ninja and Rhino gets kicked for being a n00b.
Chuffy
Posts: 93
Joined: 2007-03-19 16:33

Post by Chuffy »

ZaZZo wrote:Al Basrah was handed over to the Iraqi army amirite?
MEC vs Insurgents?

:D
Image
Reddish Red
Posts: 545
Joined: 2007-08-02 10:56

Post by Reddish Red »

Rico11b: Better than that just take the body out of the game all together, and we'll have floating heads in game.
eddie
Posts: 5495
Joined: 2005-05-09 20:42

Post by eddie »

ZaZZo wrote:Al Basrah was handed over to the Iraqi army amirite?
urite. It's planned that 2500 British troops will be left in-country for (as said) training and support.
Image
G.Drew
Posts: 4417
Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02

Post by G.Drew »

Viper5 wrote:A possible ;) to that. Still working out details.

Operation Archer was apparently cut according to the mapper who made it because it supposedly wasnt good enough, which is complete and utter bullshit. Was far and away the most beautiful, well made, best gameplay that .7 was to offer. I think he is still planning on releasing it independently.
afaik its supposedley going to be used as the first map for the Canadian forces
Last edited by G.Drew on 2008-01-03 17:10, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image

[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

Al Basrah was handed over to the Iraqi army amirit
yes with a small US SF detachment stationed near by. Ands some British units also, but only a very small group.
MEC vs Insurgents?
Cant be done. Bot hare in servers as "Team 2". And no Team 2's or 1's can face each other.
Theres also Al Anbar province:
Thats a community map. Most community maps dont make it into the mod. Maker only gets [R-Con] status.
urite. It's planned that 2500 British troops will be left in-country for (as said) training and support.
Right but will be spread out to thin to cover a whole city
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

G.Drew wrote:afaik its supposedley going to be used as the first map for the Canadian forces
Was supposed to be US v. INS in .7 but was cut cause apparently somebody thought it wasnt good enough :roll:
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”