[Vehicle] Up-Armored HMMWV [WIP]

halvor1 · Post by **halvor1** » 2008-01-12 15:20

wow looks great you need to fix the polys count to fit into the bf2 engine !

Desertfox · Post by **Desertfox** » 2008-01-12 22:26

7000 tri's isnt that much, as long as you have good LOD's it will be fine

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2008-01-12 23:53

thats a question I alwayas like to ask:

how many lods can you have per vehicle?

BloodBane611 · Post by **BloodBane611** » 2008-01-13 05:36

That's a very sexy model cheeseman. For such a sexy model I'm sure you can figure out how to make everyone happy.

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2008-01-13 06:10

Thanks for the comments guys. I'm sure I can cut down on the Tri count one way or another, but worse things worse it'll finish at 7500 Tris? I know it’s a bit of a high number in comparison to the recommended Tri count for that category of vehicle in BF2, but I’m sure peoples computers these days can handle what was recommended almost 3 years ago for the BF2 engine.

A-10Warthog · Post by **A-10Warthog** » 2008-01-13 06:21

i know mine can! and i cant wait to see this ingame!

*pops smoke n speeds off in up armored*

whats next? 40mm nade variant?

[uBp]Irish · Post by **[uBp]Irish** » 2008-01-13 06:51

"40mm GL Variant"

overpowered. And Unbalancing.

Cant be in PR.

Post by **Mongolian_dude** » 2008-01-13 11:58

[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:she's looking noice!

Its Irish for nice

And jaymz, you sound just like the Irish bloke on Bioshock

...mongol...

[uBp]Irish · Post by **[uBp]Irish** » 2008-01-13 17:51

[R-MOD]Mongolian_dude wrote:Its Irish for nice

And jaymz, you sound just like the Irish bloke on Bioshock

...mongol...

yea, dont think that was hard to understand

BetterDeadThanRed · Post by **BetterDeadThanRed** » 2008-01-13 18:19

I don't see why you have to be confined to just one variant. One could have an M2, another an M249, one a TOW missile, maybe even a CROWS. Considering how this is light-years better than the EA models, it's just my opinion that it should replace all of them in PR.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2008-01-13 19:08

dont forget miniguns hummves

BetterDeadThanRed · Post by **BetterDeadThanRed** » 2008-01-13 20:53

Like this?

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2008-01-13 21:11

Once the main vehicle is done how difficult is it to make different variants?

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2008-01-13 21:54

BetterDeadThanRed wrote:I don't see why you have to be confined to just one variant. One could have an M2, another an M249, one a TOW missile, maybe even a CROWS. Considering how this is light-years better than the EA models, it's just my opinion that it should replace all of them in PR.

Actually that's the point... me macking a replacement for both the DICE and USI Humvee models. This means if possible everything gets replaced.

A-10Warthog · Post by **A-10Warthog** » 2008-01-13 22:41

^^ well thats good. i cant wait to see the other variants.

can you mod USI's troop carrrier to look like the one in that mini gun vid? that would be amazingly awesome

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2008-01-14 01:50

[R-PUB]A-10Warthog wrote:^^ well thats good. i cant wait to see the other variants.

can you mod USI's troop carrrier to look like the one in that mini gun vid? that would be amazingly awesome

What use would it have? And actually I was given an alternative to mod the USI Humvee to look like an Up-armored HMMWV, but it was nearly impossible task to perform as the two vehicles are fairly different, plus I wanted to make mine as realistic as possible.

A-10Warthog · Post by **A-10Warthog** » 2008-01-14 02:00

^ idk it looks cool

and usi's troop carrier looks realistic...

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2008-01-14 02:08

[R-PUB]A-10Warthog wrote:^ idk it looks cool

and usi's troop carrier looks realistic...

No doubt in that, but what I mean by "realistic" is not to imply that the USI model isn’t realistic in the specific category or type of Humvee model it’s suppose to represent. By realistic I mean being provided an option to manipulate an already existing model which is not an Up-armored variant could cause series of difficulties and constraints which would most likely lead to an unrealistic model as an outcome. Also I like to make my own models from scratch.