If the P226 isn't skineed yet, this may help.

SpeedFire · Post by **SpeedFire** » 2004-09-27 20:16

From NAS Oceana 2004 Airshow. Enjoy folks.

You may also like http://www.forumplanet.com/planetbattle ... id=1491293

Post by **requiem** » 2004-09-27 20:24

Nice pics (this one included). One of our community members actually owns a Sig Navy P226.. I'm not sure if that one is though?

Anyway, good look!

SpeedFire · Post by **SpeedFire** » 2004-09-27 21:30

may help as well.

If you guys need pics of any certain thing, I likely have it. Let me know.

marto · Post by **marto** » 2004-09-28 00:43

Are the pics big enough?

Greenie Beanie · Post by **Greenie Beanie** » 2004-09-28 01:13

That's one sick pic Speedy!

Post by **Black Beret** » 2004-09-28 06:09

Good work, Speed.

Post by **ArchEnemy** » 2004-09-28 21:24

dont they use the p228 instead of the p226?

Post by **Black Beret** » 2004-09-29 05:59

[R-DEV wrote:ArchEnemy]dont they use the p228 instead of the p226?

No.

SpeedFire · Post by **SpeedFire** » 2004-09-29 21:29

Any other requests?

Dr.Spangle · Post by **Dr.Spangle** » 2004-09-29 22:03

I see nothing wrong with a "Speedfire's mega pictures thread". Why not go ahead and make one!

PunkRockerDave · Post by **PunkRockerDave** » 2004-09-30 00:16

speedy, why don't you post the rest of the weapons you got pics of?

Post by **Black Beret** » 2004-09-30 03:39

[R-DEV wrote:PunkRockerDave]speedy, why don't you post the rest of the weapons you got pics of?

Yes, that would be good. The military advisors could then select which photos would be of use to the rest of the team.

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2004-09-30 03:53

[R-DEV wrote:ArchEnemy]dont they use the p228 instead of the p226?

The SEALs use a version of the P226 made to their specifications as a standard, general-prupose sidearm. However, the P228 is in US service as the M11 Personal Defense Weapon; last I heard it's an option for issue to counterintelligence and CID personnel (i.e., those with a concealed-carry need).

As for the pics, please do post some more, Speedy. I wanted to get down there last weekend to take some photos of the new MH-60S Knighthawk, but didn't get the chance.

Post by **Black Beret** » 2004-09-30 03:55

[R-DEV wrote:Eddie Baker]I wanted to get down there last weekend to take some photos of the new MH-60S Knighthawk, but didn't get the chance.

I think Speedy got a photo of it. I'll check the DCF thread.

Post by **Black Beret** » 2004-09-30 04:07

Here she is:

Tacamo · Post by **Tacamo** » 2004-09-30 04:57

Looks like that modeler Sikorsky didn't model it right. It has the wrong branch on the side, plus it's missing the rocket pods and miniguns. Fortunately BF2 didn't use them as modelers.

bleachy · Post by **bleachy** » 2004-10-16 05:48

Great pics.