Project Reality Mini-Tournament 2006 "Campaign One"
-
Wolfmaster
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4927
- Joined: 2004-09-05 16:00
-
[BiM]Black7
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 2006-01-08 22:10
i suggest everybody that dont have a headset/mic to day ... to buy one its an great asset if you want good team work
"It's every man's dream to hear that beer and pizza can prevent cancer," he said. "However, the 17 beers and four large pizzas needed to get enough xanthohumol and lycopene to help prevent prostate cancer is unfortunately not advised."
-
Titus
- Posts: 85
- Joined: 2006-01-05 02:55
-
MonkeyNutz
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 2005-12-19 19:18
I don't want to sound overly negative but if arranging matches has taught me one thing keeping things simples is key. Most people don't read the finer details or fail to comprehend them.
The naming convention and protocol seems overly convoluted. Dealing with anything other then focusing on the game is a pain in the arse so allocating reserve soldiers and keeping track of them whilst under fire is going to be a major annoyance.
I hope TS is only going to be used for organisation purposes whilst in game chatter will use the ingame VC.
Not trying to piss on anybodies fire I've just seen the most simple of things go to pot despite been made clear over and over again. I also realise it's set up like this to make things realistic and fair but if that's really key why don't we just sign up now. That way when the next one takes place new people can be given priority (we'll have the old roster to go on)?
The naming convention and protocol seems overly convoluted. Dealing with anything other then focusing on the game is a pain in the arse so allocating reserve soldiers and keeping track of them whilst under fire is going to be a major annoyance.
I hope TS is only going to be used for organisation purposes whilst in game chatter will use the ingame VC.
Not trying to piss on anybodies fire I've just seen the most simple of things go to pot despite been made clear over and over again. I also realise it's set up like this to make things realistic and fair but if that's really key why don't we just sign up now. That way when the next one takes place new people can be given priority (we'll have the old roster to go on)?
-
Wolfmaster
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4927
- Joined: 2004-09-05 16:00
First, it's important that you agree on which army you want. What I do, is I assign you to an army. From then, the commander of that army assigns you to a squad. You can apply for squad leader in your army forums.Sir Fullforce wrote:Still can't wait...
When we sign up, Wolfmaster, please keep in mind that SpungE, Xan and I wish to be in the same squad.
I would also like to apply for Squad Leader position.

-
[BiM]Black7
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 2006-01-08 22:10
-
MonkeyNutz
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 2005-12-19 19:18
-
Fullforce
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 3751
- Joined: 2005-10-17 17:03
Roger that. ASSC for the win.'[R-PUB wrote:Wolfmaster']First, it's important that you agree on which army you want. What I do, is I assign you to an army. From then, the commander of that army assigns you to a squad. You can apply for squad leader in your army forums.
'[BiM wrote:Black7']i say try to aviod clan stacking
Good point, but that won't be a problem with me, as Sir. are not a clan!
Lame point, I know. but there will only be us 3 in a squad of 6 and a side of 28.
-
Beckwith
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00
ill be quite disappointed if thats all this is, i dont see how the vehicles are imbalanced, and it drives me nuts when people want to turn BF2 into AA. The all encompassing nature of the BF franchise, is what seperates it from most other FPS's. I to would prefer to be in the airforce (or spec ops). so im hoping all vehicles are includedDEDMON5811 wrote:I am hoping for infantry battles only because it lends to actual teamplay and tactics.
I know vehicles such as bombing can be used well but not currently I think its not balanced with vehicles.
while in battle yes but you squad platoon fireteam or company what ever Force chooses to call them will probably have more so that there are 6 in server at all timesSir Fullforce wrote:Roger that. ASSC for the win.
Good point, but that won't be a problem with me, as Sir. are not a clan!
Lame point, I know. but there will only be us 3 in a squad of 6 and a side of 28.

-
MonkeyNutz
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 2005-12-19 19:18
It's funny actually, you always get people coming to one game type trying to shape it into another.
For example I prefer CQB games typically but if I want that I go play them. I do wonder though what a smaller map with enterable buildings would play like (maybe just some hummers) - performance wise that is.
For example I prefer CQB games typically but if I want that I go play them. I do wonder though what a smaller map with enterable buildings would play like (maybe just some hummers) - performance wise that is.
-
DEDMON5811
- Posts: 867
- Joined: 2005-11-20 06:45
I am not trying to change bf2 into AA. If I wanted AA I would go play it. I have a 96 honor player. I like the vehicles in bf2 but I dont think they lend to balanced play. For a tournament situation I would like to see infantry only because it gives us the oppurtunity to show who has better teamwork and skill. if we have vehicles like tanks then on certain maps 1 team can just annihilate the other team.
-
Beckwith
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00
-
MonkeyNutz
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 2005-12-19 19:18
-
DEDMON5811
- Posts: 867
- Joined: 2005-11-20 06:45


