New balances

lonelyjew · Post by **lonelyjew** » 2006-02-20 19:38

Lots of people have been complaining about balance issues like the saw, the chinese chopper, the lav, etc. Why not balance by not making everything equivalent, but giving certain sides advantages in certain weapons. China has the best fighter and chopper, the U.S. should have the best ground weapons and vehicles, maybe mec could be an intermediate.

This seems to only be a temp. solution as I'm sure you guys are adding in tons of new vehicles later on.

Rifleman · Post by **Rifleman** » 2006-02-20 19:49

I am against forceing balance... like u said both said shall have certain adventages... diff. looking weapons but same effect? BS.
But mate... now the game is a bit.... far for reality still... watch AKs ;]
We must wait for goodies from PRMM dev team ! ;]

Post by **RikiRude** » 2006-02-20 20:37

ive always thought the same thing. in fact thats my biggest pet peeve about BF2 it seems like it really doesnt matter what side your on your basically using the same weapon/vehicle but with a different skin.

Evangalin · Post by **Evangalin** » 2006-02-20 21:21

lonelyjew wrote:Lots of people have been complaining about balance issues like the saw, the chinese chopper, the lav, etc. Why not balance by not making everything equivalent, but giving certain sides advantages in certain weapons. China has the best fighter and chopper, the U.S. should have the best ground weapons and vehicles, maybe mec could be an intermediate.

This seems to only be a temp. solution as I'm sure you guys are adding in tons of new vehicles later on.

Ummm..no. The US should absolutely RAPE in the air. China the Many, America the Powerful, Arabia the Hidden.

Zantetsuken · Post by **Zantetsuken** » 2006-02-20 23:47

you wanna make it balanced, so you cant give one side superiority in one area - if China has 3 or 4 helos, or helos that are practically invincible - the US would get pwnd no matter what they did...