[Weapon] USP

Post by **Matrox** » 2008-04-09 21:11

This USP came from clan deadgoat but the texture is all mine

Crits and comments if you please, the front part where the silencer is supposed to screw on isn't completed yet, nor is the silencer and torch attachments. otherwise, crit away!

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2008-04-09 21:21

Looks fantastic except one little thing. The two white dots the aiming help aren't they a little bit too big? I mean on all airsoft USPs I saw and fired the dots were way smaller but the rest is awesome!

Post by **Spec** » 2008-04-09 21:29

hmm.. the safety/fire selector switch does look a bit strange.

I dont know the real one, but it looks like you could, from its position right now, put it down. But the "S" is over the "F" here, that means you'd have to put the switch up to get the S on its position.

EDIT: Oh, no, sorry, i'm wrong, it really looks like that. Sry again.

Post by **Evilhomer** » 2008-04-09 21:31

glad someone's looking closely! yup you've cocked that bit up, will have to go back and alter it

Post by **Matrox** » 2008-04-09 21:33

Yup, good call there operator, and agree with Mainboard to, wasn't sure myself, and have never gotten close to a USp myself :/

=Romagnolo= · Post by **=Romagnolo=** » 2008-04-09 21:40

Nice well modeled and textured ! The small scars look good too.

Post by **bosco_** » 2008-04-09 22:11

Nice!
I sense a future candidate to replace the silenced M9

jonjacob34 · Post by **jonjacob34** » 2008-04-09 23:52

357 compact tactical with out the compact pistol frame? you might wanna take a look at that, what gives it away is the trigger guard as it the full size frame rather than the compact frame. it more of a tactical than the compact tactical basicly (i'm no gun pro but you might wanna take a look at it), and around the rear of the pistol grip there is suppost to be a mesh for grip, other than those problems it the dogs bollocks mate.

A-10Warthog · Post by **A-10Warthog** » 2008-04-10 00:05

holy ****. its beautiful.

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2008-04-10 09:43

You should really write Tactical not Compact on it.
Whats wrong with the selector?

Look at this USP tactical.

General_J0k3r · Post by **General_J0k3r** » 2008-04-10 11:10

this model is pure pwnage. will it be in PR?

Post by **e-Gor** » 2008-04-10 11:37

Looks awesome! Needs more bumpmap lovin' though

Post by **marcoelnk** » 2008-04-10 12:03

wow...thats really impressive

Post by **Spec** » 2008-04-10 18:53

Like i said, i was wrong about the selector. I didnt know the real one, so only looked at what i saw. I edited my post already. The real one looks strange too, then^^

robbo · Post by **robbo** » 2008-04-10 20:28

The only Critisisem that i have is that it isnt in PR, please put it in maybe as the standard issue side arm for the MEC?

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2008-04-11 00:43

Why should the MEC forces get a USP Tactical?! That's PR not PU mate.

DavidP · Post by **DavidP** » 2008-04-11 02:25

Awesome! Who will get it? Please tell me it's the Sniper! Or Spec-Ops!

nedlands1 · Post by **nedlands1** » 2008-04-11 02:45

MEC sidearm?

Maxfragg · Post by **Maxfragg** » 2008-04-11 09:51

would be great, then they just need the G3A3/TSG (Ugl variant with HK79 ugl) and the G3SG1 to get rid of all russian handheld weapons (okay the rpg will stay, but thats it)

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2008-04-11 13:06

As far as I'm aware the L-At is gonna get replaced for MEC too. From a prettiness point of view this model is ace though, don't know anything about the details that need changing though. Will this model not lag a little? It looks very high detail.