Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
fartknocker12345
Posts: 35
Joined: 2007-07-13 08:09

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by fartknocker12345 »

Well, clearly there is something wrong with how the helos work because there is no combat helocopter in the world the hovers a 800 meters and stits there. IRL, Helos fly LOW to evade aa and tanks. Very strange that we have helos hovering at 600 meters to avoid aa, because IRL that would be the LAST thing you would want to do!
Alex6714
Posts: 3900
Joined: 2007-06-15 22:47

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by Alex6714 »

fartknocker12345 wrote:Well, clearly there is something wrong with how the helos work because there is no combat helocopter in the world the hovers a 800 meters and stits there. IRL, Helos fly LOW to evade aa and tanks. Very strange that we have helos hovering at 600 meters to avoid aa, because IRL that would be the LAST thing you would want to do!
Except in real life helicopters have radar, sofisticated threat detection sistems, stabilization and engage from a much further distance. ;)
"Today's forecast calls for 30mm HE rain with a slight chance of hellfires"


"oh, they're fire and forget all right...they're fired then they forget where the target is"
Psyko
Posts: 4466
Joined: 2008-01-03 13:34

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by Psyko »

Sirsolo wrote:IRL, most AA's cant even lock onto heli's like the Apache.. seeing as it has sooo many counters built right in to confuse the system..
How about bringing the hit ratio down 40% for AAA and increasing their payload? And i think the weapon accurasy could be brought down a tad, as there dowsnt seem to be much bullet drop for those heavy rounds.
@bsurd
Posts: 353
Joined: 2008-03-18 12:52

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by @bsurd »

Emnyron wrote:Im sorry, Your serious? Let me do a proper "BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA" at you..

Ever even looked at 5th generation AA missiles?
They got a couple of cool features, most noteable might be the electro-optical imaging infrared seekers..
i agree with you, seen it on TV a view weeks ago.

The last Generation of an AA Vehicle Look´s on EVERYTHING. Has a fight distance of more then 60 KM and a hit(and destroy) rate of more then 90 % and costs more then 250.000 Dollars.

After the beep its was 2 late ;-)

But in RL the Apache or the Attack choppers a very bad toys 2. So it must be balanced...

And reduce all Spawntimes :-) (Sry but i ever had 2 say this, because thats the badest part of the game)
Mora
Posts: 2933
Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by Mora »

Almost everyone seems to agree that the spawn times should be reduced.
Nemesis6
Posts: 55
Joined: 2008-04-04 22:46

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by Nemesis6 »

Now I've posted here, that means one more.
Waaah_Wah
Posts: 3167
Joined: 2007-07-26 13:55

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by Waaah_Wah »

Mora wrote:Almost everyone seems to agree that the spawn times should be reduced.
Exept the DEV's and thats all that matters ;)
Never argue with an idiot, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you by experience ;)

Killing for peace is like f*cking for virginity

I :33_love: Jaymz
IAJTHOMAS
Posts: 1149
Joined: 2006-12-20 14:14

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by IAJTHOMAS »

Mora wrote:Almost everyone seems to agree that the spawn times should be reduced.
Actually I think you'll find a lot of people who think its a terrible idea...
When you take out a heavy asset, whatever it may be, it shouldn't be bothering you for a considerable while.
ImageImage

Image
Tartantyco
Posts: 2796
Joined: 2006-10-21 14:11

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by Tartantyco »

Keep respawn time on attack helos, lower it for scout helos(10 mins, 15 for the ones with rocket pods).
Make Norway OPFOR! NAO!
ImageImage
It's your hamster Richard. It's your hamster in the box and it's not breathing.
CAS_117
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2007-03-26 18:01

Re: Get down! DON"T get in da choppah!

Post by CAS_117 »

Actually I think you'll find a lot of people who think its a terrible idea...
When you take out a heavy asset, whatever it may be, it shouldn't be bothering you for a considerable while.
Except that theres an equal number of them on your team. Most of those people are the ones who get shot by them anyways. Maybe trying to make infantry important on certain maps is so difficult because thats not how it really is?
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”