[Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Making or wanting help making your own asset? Check in here
Locked
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

Cool, horses held :D
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by =Romagnolo= »

Image

They want run!
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro."
(yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by =Romagnolo= »

cplgangster wrote:i had a very nice ride in the back of one of them.
it is such an experience especially when the ramp is open even though your strapped in its still scary.

Is it something like this video ?


http://youtube.com/watch?v=CxAFXNQhkq0[/youtube]
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro."
(yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
Psyko
Posts: 4466
Joined: 2008-01-03 13:34

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Psyko »

'[R-DEV wrote:AfterDune;504093']Arjan, [scrambled] is NOT possible. Many attempts have been made, but it's just not possible. What you saw is most probably a trick to fool you or not BF2. A hook is just another "vehicle" and as everyone knows, BF2 vehicles CAN'T get along with each other.
You know the way when people spawn the kind of drop from a high elevation very quickly and click to the ground? couldnt you make a combo of that with some sore of fake rope image thats temporary. idk just a suggestion i guess.

This chinook is brilliant dude!
Teek
Posts: 3162
Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Teek »

will it float?
Image
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

Ive seen that video where they drive a boat into the back of the chinook.
Im not sure you should be able to land on water with the engine off, would be good if it was a bit more durable vs water though
+SiN+headhunter
Posts: 148
Joined: 2007-12-19 09:39

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by +SiN+headhunter »

ICE tell us more about your chinook.

LOL =Romagnolo= your SIG is funny
Image
Project Reality 0.856 click for downloads ^^New Australian server up^^
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Hitperson »

Teek wrote:will it float?

Thats what i keep asking and yes they do float with the door open and engines off.
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Maxfragg »

should not be too hard to do, i did make even a tank swimming in bf2 :-P basicly you add the swimmers of the LAV-25 (invisible objects) to the vehicle and thats it
G.Drew
Posts: 4417
Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by G.Drew »

tbh i think just using it as a normal helo without the whole landing on water thing would be fine, since its causing so much bother

for example how much landing in water are you going to do in Afganistan or Iraq?
Image
Image

[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Hitperson »

its meerly a realism issue but it will probably become a ballance issue. :roll:
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

Hitperson wrote:Thats what i keep asking and yes they do float with the door open and engines off.
wow thats crazy :shock: It'd be great to have a new water capable type craft. Could even use it as a static model starting point for smaller beach assault type maps instead of the carrier
DeltaFart
Posts: 2409
Joined: 2008-02-12 20:36

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by DeltaFart »

hey is a sling possible for the chinook? I been playing BFV for a bit and love just bringing the tanks and stuff in from the carrier on iwo
I assume they use the same engine?
Sabre_tooth_tigger
Posts: 1922
Joined: 2007-06-01 20:14

Post by Sabre_tooth_tigger »

Dont think its possible but apparently it is the same engine roughly. I presume the devs dont have access to the engine directly in the same way as they did in bfv

Refractor Engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Refractor Engine, is a game engine designed by Stockholm-based studio Refraction Games, first developed for the computer game Codename Eagle, which was released in November 1999. Since then, Refraction Games was bought by Digital Illusions CE, and working alongside with the Refraction Games team, designed and developed the Refractor 2 Engine for the famous Battlefield game series for the computer.[1] The following list of games uses the Refractor 2 Engine: Battlefield 1942, Battlefield Vietnam, Battlefield 2, Battlefield 2142 and Battlefield Heroes.
:shock:
Last edited by Sabre_tooth_tigger on 2008-05-30 13:37, edited 7 times in total.
supahpingi
Posts: 1921
Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by supahpingi »

I dont think its possible,afaik bf2 uses an updated version of the version bfv had,and the collisions in bf2 dont work well,that why pr/bf2 doesnt have any smaller landing crafts.
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Hitperson »

DeltaFart wrote:hey is a sling possible for the chinook? I been playing BFV for a bit and love just bringing the tanks and stuff in from the carrier on iwo
I assume they use the same engine?
it's those famous words again "hard coded" :roll:
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
ice_killer
Posts: 2361
Joined: 2007-02-15 16:20

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by ice_killer »

yup :(
I7 980X, REX3, Dominator GT 12G, 4X XFXHD6970 2G yes Quadfire , SSD 3x Raptors 2X 1.2 KW :mrgreen:
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: [Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by Scot »

So EA and DICE in their awesomeness actually went backwards... wow..
Image
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Community Modding”