US Army Update Part 1

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
XxNinjaSinXx
Posts: 103
Joined: 2007-09-19 06:21

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by XxNinjaSinXx »

Actually Delta Force and Capitol SWAT team are the only unit that are issued the HK416 in the United States.

However, rumors has been flying around that Special Forces including Army Rangers will be issued the SCAR instead.
CodeSpartan
Posts: 127
Joined: 2007-01-02 07:22

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by CodeSpartan »

XxNinjaSinXx wrote:Actually Delta Force and Capitol SWAT team are the only unit that are issued the HK416 in the United States.

However, rumors has been flying around that Special Forces including Army Rangers will be issued the SCAR instead.
Rumors? From what I've heard, SOCOM has already purchased some and it's already given out in limited amounts.
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Jaymz »

moj wrote: I just hope, that the M203 grenadier version will be fitted with an ACOG.
All UGL variants will be fitted with optics.
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Scot »

So a remodel of everyone, and what about MEC?? Is it G3 with UGL??
Image
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Maxfragg »

offcause, it is a G3 with HK79, or how HK calls it a G3-TGS / Tactical Group Support and the well known scope.
the devs said it somewhere long time ago
Scot
Posts: 9270
Joined: 2008-01-20 19:45

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Scot »

Cool, just wondering, making sure our MEC friends don't get left behind!! Though will miss the AK pwnage :(
Image
CodeSpartan
Posts: 127
Joined: 2007-01-02 07:22

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by CodeSpartan »

So, how long until we have to replace all the M203 models with M320? Seeing as this is supposed to be set in the near future already.
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Maxfragg »

i guess we will have to take the M203 - it had been done already some time ago
DeadSmile187
Posts: 172
Joined: 2007-12-17 16:24

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by DeadSmile187 »

damn hot ! are the M4 Carbine got a New Sound ?
Image
Image
"We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem!"
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em."
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by agentscar »

As of right now,the "U.S. SOCOM Navy SEALS" are the only ones using SCAR's...
Image
Image
Image
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Jaymz »

DMR for the MEC will actually be the G3SG1.
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
CodeSpartan
Posts: 127
Joined: 2007-01-02 07:22

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by CodeSpartan »

Paperchase wrote:I disagree. The G3 should be shifted over as a DMR like the M14. Even in open maps I find it cumbersome to use the recoil-heavy G3. A great way to 'modernize' the battle rifle MEC would be to introduce the HK33 as a primary assault rifle, using the HK53's animations.
As a fan of battle rifles, I can't say I agree with this viewpoint. I like my guns to have enough punch to put someone down with the first shot, or else you run the risk of getting into a prolonged firefight.
Plus... once you replace the G3, suddenly every faction is using 5.56 weapons as their issued rifles, and that sounds boring as hell. As long as we have a fictional faction, can't we use it to provide some variety?
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Maxfragg »

actually Paperchase you did get me wrong, i did not say that the HK33 would not have some advantages, but the G3 was the DEVs decision and they will keep it.
Aditional i must say, that i am also a fan of the battlerifles and of the varity they bring in the game. But i would welcome it when at least one class of the MEC would get a HK33 but it should not replace the G3, as well as i would also like it, when in the US Forces one class could get a M-14 with eotech or ironsights since they are also again used by some soldiers in other roles than as DMR
CodeSpartan
Posts: 127
Joined: 2007-01-02 07:22

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by CodeSpartan »

Well, additionally, why is everyone saying HK33?
The G3 makes sense because it was exported like crazy before the AK-47 became popular, and is the main rifle of Iran, so it would be a historically accurate choice.
But why the HK33? It's not even used by any mid-eastern countries, unless you count Turkey.
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Maxfragg »

for one simple reason, to claim down all replace the G3 shouts and to give all that can not use the G3 a alternative ;-)
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Jaymz »

Maxfragg wrote:when in the US Forces one class could get a M-14 with eotech or ironsights since they are also again used by some soldiers in other roles than as DMR
watch BHD much?

Image
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
Maxfragg
Posts: 2122
Joined: 2007-01-02 22:10

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Maxfragg »

come on, i know that you see it in BHD - BUT in difference to some others i do not think that it is a good source

Image
Last edited by Maxfragg on 2008-06-23 11:14, edited 1 time in total.
Burlock
Posts: 183
Joined: 2007-07-04 10:22

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Burlock »

surely time for part 2 of this update


please.... :grin:
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: US Army Update Part 1

Post by Rhino »

Burlock wrote:surely time for part 2 of this update


please.... :grin:
that depends on if we can get our test server back up.... :(
Image
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”