The Fighter Jet Debate

[BrokenArrow]

i just see a problem with no fighter aircraft, something needs to keep the A-10s and frogfoots in check when the SAMs will themselves be vulnerable to attack from the ground attack fighters themselves.

[Martini]

I guess if we can't all agree which is the best route to go with the jets, we can all agree to have some maps with both, and go from there.

From what I can see here I like all the ideas, so I'm sure the answer lies in the mixture of all of them

It would be cool to have the maps tailored to the vehicles as well. That way an armor oriented map would involve more air-ground air combat etc.

Some of the maps just feel like the vehicles were added at the end. Sometimes you'll be rolling into a firefight in a tight city street thinking "I really shouldn't be driving this vehicle in here". I am going to mess around with the map maker and see if I can make some maps that encourage the armor battallion to support the troops rather then rush into the heat of the battle themselves. Might be neat.

[arjan]

Voted for only CAS aircraft.

Let the CAS aircraft do the job of delivering a deadly payload, and have AAV's killing CAS aircraft.
It should be more a fight off ground vs air, atleast would be much more intresting.

[BetterDeadThanRed]

Holy necro thread Batman!

Replace the fighters with CAS and be done with it.

[Waaah_Wah]

3 years ago... My god!

[Scot]

Woowww...

[Tirak]

... Should this be locked simply because it's so out of date? I mean, they're talking about making jets have to land to rearm, that was implemented how long ago?

[SuperTimo]

extreme thread revive!!!!

no fighters must stay in a full scale war fighters are required to gain air suppiroority over a battlefield to then allow CAS jets and choppers to operate safely

also if you dont like pure fighters than have more swing role ones like the typhoon and J-10 (but not as **** as the J-10)

jets are a major part of modern combat and should be in there as such, they just need a few more tweaks in PR.

[Ragni<RangersPL>]

... Should this be locked simply because it's so out of date?

I hope so...

I hope this one will be locked, along with this one:
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f18-pr ... ion-3.html

PR have change a lot since 2005.

[Rhino]

3 year bump any one?

this topic is now pointless, its 3 years old and it surveys no purpose to the current version. Please dont bump topics like this.

locked.