a suggestion for tanks

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
snoopdogy
Posts: 60
Joined: 2006-03-31 01:49

a suggestion for tanks

Post by snoopdogy »

cold you make the tanks have a driver and a gunner and not being able to be both it will take a lot of skill and team work and take a way the mighty god feel what the tank has.
Pence
Posts: 2248
Joined: 2006-02-04 06:10

Post by Pence »

This has been debated before.
"I am not bald, i shave my head"
Image
"How could you falter when you're the rock of Gibraltar"
snoopdogy
Posts: 60
Joined: 2006-03-31 01:49

Post by snoopdogy »

sry didnt no or wold't of made the post
Animalmother
Posts: 1201
Joined: 2006-03-26 03:31

Post by Animalmother »

I think it should be made like in DCR. Tank commander/driver (tells which direction to shoot and has a .50), gunner (operates turret), and 1 optional seat for the "loader." (has an m249) Not the MOST realistic, but it felt realistic ingame lol.
AznLB
Posts: 475
Joined: 2006-02-13 21:01

Post by AznLB »

snoopdogy wrote:sry didnt no or wold't of made the post
Yes, it has, in fact I started a thread on this same subject a while ago. I suggest you stop being so cheeky.

Tanks need a Gunner and a Driver, no if's and's or but's about it. Tanks MUST have a two person crew to operate. They are too powerful right now, and don't do what a tank does in real life: stay back and neutralize enemy tanks/APCs.

A two person crew would add to the realism, and take nothing away from gameplay, in fact, it would add to the gameplay and make tanking more fun.

No half-assed jobs either, a Driver and a Gunner. Make it so there's absolutely no way the tank can gun and move without two people. A commander could jump in to give the tank added spotting and visual ability, but that's optional.
Last edited by AznLB on 2006-04-03 22:07, edited 1 time in total.
Cerberus
Posts: 2727
Joined: 2005-11-15 22:24

Post by Cerberus »

I agree completely with AznLB. Simply too unrealistic for one person to man a tank
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case."

- Abraham Lincoln


"i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;"

- Garabaldi
snoopdogy
Posts: 60
Joined: 2006-03-31 01:49

Post by snoopdogy »

I suggest you stop being so cheeky
im not lol i relly didnt no.i full agree with your post tho thetes the way it shold be
EON_MagicMan
Posts: 224
Joined: 2006-02-05 18:43

Post by EON_MagicMan »

Red Orchestra knows how it's done.
In order for that to work, you'd half to have an extra command rose. The middle button would be "Stop", and all the buttons around it would be directions. (I.E the bottom would be "Reverse", the top would be "Forward", you'd have "Left and Right", and in between you'd have "Turn left a little" or "Turn right a little"). It also wouldn't be a bad idea if the Commander/Gunner would be able to assign "Move here" commands to only the vehicle.
Image
snoopdogy
Posts: 60
Joined: 2006-03-31 01:49

Post by snoopdogy »

eon i dont agree at all. aznlb is bang on point a driver/gunner and a place for the commander if a guy wants to jump in then you have squad coms to work as a tank crew
EON_MagicMan
Posts: 224
Joined: 2006-02-05 18:43

Post by EON_MagicMan »

No one would want to be commander. That's why you gotta have one guy driving the chasis, and another guy controlling the turret, and the guy controlling the turret needs to somehow have the option (maybe by pressing the 'vehicle crouch button'?) to poke his head out the top and have a look around.
Image
Happy
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1807
Joined: 2005-11-07 02:43

Post by Happy »

Give the commander the MG mounted on top, which is both realistic and would give him something to do.
Proud Killer of 38 Spambots.
Image
Image
After much intense calculation, it has been decided that your thread is already in the forum that you wish to move it to. Deep Thought should be jealous. - Moderator Control Panel
Cerberus
Posts: 2727
Joined: 2005-11-15 22:24

Post by Cerberus »

How about when he presses Ctrl, he turns in (gets into turret and closes hatch)
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case."

- Abraham Lincoln


"i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;"

- Garabaldi
NikovK
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1616
Joined: 2005-10-28 09:56

Post by NikovK »

The anti-aircraft machine gun is not the commander's true responsibility. What is needed is...

Driver in the hull with a fixed or periscope-based view able to fire smoke grenades.

Gunner in the turret looking through the current display, able to select round types and aiming and firing the weapon.

I do not think a dedicated commander seat is nessicary, other than a position to switch to for operating the AA machine gun.
Mapper of Road to Kyongan'Ni and Hills of Hamgyong;
Genius behind many Really Stupid Ideas, and some Decent Ones.

Image
six7
Posts: 1784
Joined: 2006-03-06 03:17

Post by six7 »

commander can be optional. like the current gunner position, only with the ability to climb down into the hatch and give orders

also, would anyone like to see people being able to ride on the sides of a tank (just for transport from the main base to a hotzone), kinda like in halo? i hate it when im on foot and there is a tank right there that could take me to the frontlines, but i cant hop on.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”