[CH]QBZ-95

trogdor1289 · Post by **trogdor1289** » 2006-04-07 23:14

gotta suck to be that guy with the m60 when your running away. I also didn't know they still use the m60.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/hissyfit.html
watch to the end of this video man is it creepy i suggest physcirtaic help for this kid unless of course it is a joke video.
In offtopic forum there is a video post thread.

Pence · Post by **Pence** » 2006-04-08 00:06

trogdor1289 wrote:gotta suck to be that guy with the m60 when your running away. I also didn't know they still use the m60.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/hissyfit.html
watch to the end of this video man is it creepy i suggest physcirtaic help for this kid unless of course it is a joke video.
In offtopic forum there is a video post thread.

He looks like a guy i know... (EXSACLY LIKE HIM! Glasses, the weight and his hissyfits)

Pence · Post by **Pence** » 2006-04-08 00:10

'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino']Its a "Light Support Weapons", hence the LSW. Thats why jellys suggest you could switch bettween a LSW and a bigger merchien gun for the task that needed to be done. For exsample you might want to support the squad with a little bit of cover fire, but at the same time be more suited for close combat where the LSW would come in better than a bigger merchien gun.

No, no, no; The LSW or L86 is in the process of swaping roles from light support weapon to the DMR for the British Army.

Cerberus · Post by **Cerberus** » 2006-04-08 00:26

Yeah, I heard the Minimi is actually used in situations where they need suppressing fire, not the LSW

trogdor1289 · Post by **trogdor1289** » 2006-04-08 02:23

Wow this thread is getting kinda random but anyway special figting combatives for you wussies out there
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... os&pl=true
lol yeah right.

Sgt. Jarvis · Post by **Sgt. Jarvis** » 2006-04-09 05:54

What the hell you damn forum Pirates...Hijacking threads left and right LOL. Get back on subject or make your own post. Anyways, yeah the QBZ-95 does have flaws, like left handed operators cannot operate it effectively, as the ejection port in the bullpup design would have the hot casings eject into the user's face, point blank. So what lefties have to do is tilt it on a 45 degree angle and then shoot, which is a very uncomfortable firing position.

Cerberus · Post by **Cerberus** » 2006-04-09 16:53

Too bad there are no lefties in PRMM

JellyBelly · Post by **JellyBelly** » 2006-04-09 16:58

Pence wrote:he LSW or L86 is in the process of swaping roles from light support weapon to the DMR for the British Army.

Its not officially been changed as of yet. Im pretty sure it will though, considering how pointless it is as a support weapon.

Sgt. Jarvis · Post by **Sgt. Jarvis** » 2006-04-10 04:50

There are some sources stating that this puppy is widely active in sufficient numbers with the Chinese Military. The regular rifled design is missing from the Chinese forces ingame, I think it should be modeled but that's up to the dev team. There is the short version, the support version, and the sniper version of the family, shouldn't there be the standard rifle?

Oh, and DON'T HIJACK MY THREAD.

Skullening.Chris · Post by **Skullening.Chris** » 2006-04-10 04:55

Yeah, I'm seeing conflicting info on this gun a lot. But for the sake of making things more uniform, I say add it too. The Type-81 looks outta place with the more modern sniper/support/spec ops weapons.

Cerberus · Post by **Cerberus** » 2006-04-10 04:56

Good point, Jarvis. The PLA in PR really needs the standard QBZ-95

Post by **NikovK** » 2006-04-10 05:08

I'm for the QBZ-95 absolutely 100%. Remember it shoots a 5.8mm round, making it the heaviest standard battle rifle round.

I'm pretty sure the Chinese front-line troops would have these weapons by the time of the conflict.

Sgt. Jarvis · Post by **Sgt. Jarvis** » 2006-04-10 05:49

You'd think, they have a bigger and better economy than the USA LOL. In serious war time, they would turn out these things at a much higher rate, not as quick as the PPs-41 lol, but quick.