ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
-
SocketMan
- Posts: 1687
- Joined: 2007-03-09 22:03
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Bad idea imo.
Most current public servers can barely handle 64 with BR on,you want 120+?
Unless there are some minimum requirements put in place,so that all servers are
capable or running all maps without any lag with BR turned on,then maybe.
Otherwise forget about,sure it sounds good on the paper,but in "reality" not really.
Most current public servers can barely handle 64 with BR on,you want 120+?
Unless there are some minimum requirements put in place,so that all servers are
capable or running all maps without any lag with BR turned on,then maybe.
Otherwise forget about,sure it sounds good on the paper,but in "reality" not really.
-
Sadist_Cain
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: 2007-08-22 14:47
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Thankyou 
It should be just as easy as changing a few Hex numbers, the game can handle 114 players but the problem lies in trying to do it online there's a hardcode wall that gets in the way of the client to server chatting or something along those lines
Technically it's possible but you can only do it with bots and the one lil line of code that needs fiddlin so you can involve extra playersg is against the EULA to fiddle with
It should be just as easy as changing a few Hex numbers, the game can handle 114 players but the problem lies in trying to do it online there's a hardcode wall that gets in the way of the client to server chatting or something along those lines
Technically it's possible but you can only do it with bots and the one lil line of code that needs fiddlin so you can involve extra playersg is against the EULA to fiddle with

-
antiiraq
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 2008-08-02 20:29
-
space
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: 2008-03-02 06:42
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Whats happening with this/what is the plan?
Personally I think it should be sent off now. The signatures dropping off now, so its better to look like it got loads of signatures in a short time.
Also if they agreed to the changes, they will be made in the 1.5 patch which theyre working on right now and are due to release very soon ( Im pretty sure this will be the last patch as well )
I say SEND IT OFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!
Personally I think it should be sent off now. The signatures dropping off now, so its better to look like it got loads of signatures in a short time.
Also if they agreed to the changes, they will be made in the 1.5 patch which theyre working on right now and are due to release very soon ( Im pretty sure this will be the last patch as well )
I say SEND IT OFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!
-
~XHW~Flamestorm
- Posts: 273
- Joined: 2008-01-17 20:00
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
i agree with spacemanc
-
marcoelnk
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: 2007-03-03 11:30
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
imo far too few players signed this and its full of spamposts of one angry child anyway...so i dont like to say this but it looks like its a complete fail.Whats happening with this/what is the plan?
Personally I think it should be sent off now. The signatures dropping off now, so its better to look like it got loads of signatures in a short time.
Also if they agreed to the changes, they will be made in the 1.5 patch which theyre working on right now and are due to release very soon ( Im pretty sure this will be the last patch as well )
I say SEND IT OFF NOW!!!!!!!!!!

-
Gore
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: 2008-02-15 21:39
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Definatley signed, I'll spread this as much as I can.
-
space
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: 2008-03-02 06:42
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Did we all waste our time with this, or is there some kind of intention to send it off?
The 1.5 patch is due very soon - its pointless sending it any later than NOW in my opinion.
Please let us know what you plan to do UK_Force.
The 1.5 patch is due very soon - its pointless sending it any later than NOW in my opinion.
Please let us know what you plan to do UK_Force.
-
xatu miller
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 2008-05-01 12:38
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
only 2300 people signed it so far... the whole bf2 community counts at least 2 million. Ea won't care about such a small number of people. Also i dunno if its true but i red it in one of the posts on Pr forums that in bf2 v1.5 mods will be made illegal(i seriously doubt that).spacemanc wrote:Did we all waste our time with this, or is there some kind of intention to send it off?
The 1.5 patch is due very soon - its pointless sending it any later than NOW in my opinion.
Please let us know what you plan to do UK_Force.
"Intermolecular interactions in the flake's matrix could be weakened by the plasticizer [water], leading to the solubilization of some components, and to a decrease in mechanical integrity."
READ: Water makes cereal soggy.
-
AOD_Morph
- Posts: 248
- Joined: 2007-03-03 04:28
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
That post was a joke in the off topic section.P.S.Txatu miller wrote:only 2300 people signed it so far... the whole bf2 community counts at least 2 million. Ea won't care about such a small number of people. Also i dunno if its true but i red it in one of the posts on Pr forums that in bf2 v1.5 mods will be made illegal(i seriously doubt that).
Ingame: =TCC= Morph265
-
xatu miller
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 2008-05-01 12:38
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
THANK YOU THAT U TOLD ME THAT!... actually i didn't know it was in the offtopic because i searched in google for 1.5 bf2 info. So i saw this link to pr forums and just looked at it... though err haven't noticed it was in the off-topic forumAOD_Morph wrote:That post was a joke in the off topic section.
"Intermolecular interactions in the flake's matrix could be weakened by the plasticizer [water], leading to the solubilization of some components, and to a decrease in mechanical integrity."
READ: Water makes cereal soggy.
-
AnRK
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: 2007-03-27 14:17
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Really dunno how this happened, but the petition came up on one of my tabs today (looked through my history and emails and couldn't find where the link came from).
Anyway, I'm on the forums far too much for my own good, and I hadn't come across it despite it being a good couple of months old. It's got over 2000 sigs but it might be worth stickying this thread just incase anyone else hasn't seen it yet, seems like the message has spread a fair bit though. I assume it's been whored about in some other forums but the more the better obviously. I know it says earlier theres a good reason for it not to be, but it's a little old now.
Was kinda surprised there was no mention of more then 8 in a vehicle in the thing, but nevermind, it's probably pretty implicit, if EA/Dice do anything about it that is.
Anyway, I'm on the forums far too much for my own good, and I hadn't come across it despite it being a good couple of months old. It's got over 2000 sigs but it might be worth stickying this thread just incase anyone else hasn't seen it yet, seems like the message has spread a fair bit though. I assume it's been whored about in some other forums but the more the better obviously. I know it says earlier theres a good reason for it not to be, but it's a little old now.
Was kinda surprised there was no mention of more then 8 in a vehicle in the thing, but nevermind, it's probably pretty implicit, if EA/Dice do anything about it that is.
-
Smuke
- Posts: 877
- Joined: 2007-09-25 16:21
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Signed.
Lets hope EA use their brains.
Lets hope EA use their brains.
In-Game Name: SmukeUK
Wild_Bill: Smuke, you are a true ninja!.
Wild_Bill: Smuke, you are a true ninja!.
-
Dude388
- Posts: 404
- Joined: 2008-07-21 21:15
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
I'm still hopeful that this petition comes to pass.Marine94 wrote:Signed.
Lets hope EA use their brains.
But the chances of EA using their brains on this topic is about as likely to happen as all of the vBF2 community to stop grenade spamming forever.
-
Mora
- Posts: 2933
- Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Saying that EA wont do this will only increase the amount of "Ha, they think we would not do this - so we wont have to do it"
-
cyberzomby
- Posts: 5336
- Joined: 2007-04-03 07:12
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
Well I found a report somewhere of an "EA investigation" what the player base wants for the next update. And the upgrade for server limit is in there. So they know what we want.
-
HunterMed
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: 2007-04-08 17:28
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
to all EA leet community spies:
WE WANTS MOAR PEOPLS ON SERVA!

WE WANTS MOAR PEOPLS ON SERVA!
-
Skodz
- Posts: 791
- Joined: 2007-05-26 06:31
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
I signed it but I seriously doubt EA would listen to the community. Just look how hard it is for them to release the 1.5 patch... They hate supporting their games. They just want to sells new one. How long do you think it would take for EA To develop and release a 1.6 patch with the player increase ? Years!
Although, maybe they'll consider increasing the player limit on Battlefield 3.
Although, maybe they'll consider increasing the player limit on Battlefield 3.
-
77SiCaRiO77
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4982
- Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44
Re: ipetition - for EA / Dice for Player limit Increase - READ ME
do you guys seriusly think that raising the server limit is as easy as changing some values in word pad?
you know , there is a reason of why they didnt incluided 128 slots in serves .
you know , there is a reason of why they didnt incluided 128 slots in serves .

[/URL]



