No, I didn't say it was totally unrealistic. I even said in my post that I thought the UN had deployed some troops to Georgia to help out with rebels somewhere along the line. I think it was back in the 90s with Clinton (obviously he didn't play along with it, but British might have, I forget).
Also, I don't ask that backstories are 100% real, but does it make sense for a giant government or international army (PLA or MEC) to be getting their weapons from a bunch of militia men? The Chinese army isn't some war lord in Somalia or Sierra Leone.
Militia's Designated Role
-
EOD_Security-2252
- Posts: 804
- Joined: 2008-06-10 23:08
Re: Militia's Designated Role
Informally retired modder - Projects: Artillery Shell IED,PSC Faction
-
IronTaxi
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4925
- Joined: 2006-05-31 12:56
Re: Militia's Designated Role
sure...the primary arms makers are all on "the good guys" side...so they get some more gear via the back door channels... hehehEOD_Security-2252 wrote:No, I didn't say it was totally unrealistic. I even said in my post that I thought the UN had deployed some troops to Georgia to help out with rebels somewhere along the line. I think it was back in the 90s with Clinton (obviously he didn't play along with it, but British might have, I forget).
Also, I don't ask that backstories are 100% real, but does it make sense for a giant government or international army (PLA or MEC) to be getting their weapons from a bunch of militia men? The Chinese army isn't some war lord in Somalia or Sierra Leone.
Hey.. arms dealers are arms dealers!! gotta be dealt with adh preferably by the Brits!!!
ttfn!