Tartantyco wrote:Basically, you can't use .50 cal ammo on individual targets but clusters(Along with a few more rules). So what you have to ask yourself is; if you fire upon a cluster and when you stop there's one guy standing is, can you take that last guy down?
Tartantyco wrote:-Actually, there are restrictions, they're NATO restrictions, and they're completely impossible to enforce, making them somewhat pointless. Basically, you can't use .50 cal ammo on individual targets but clusters(Along with a few more rules). So what you have to ask yourself is; if you fire upon a cluster and when you stop there's one guy standing is, can you take that last guy down? Think there's a rule against using tracer rounds as well, but nothing of this is enforced as far as I can remember, it's just stupid.
Do you have any source on this?
I know certain ammunition (multi-purpose rounds) is restricted against personell, but I don't think there are any restrictions beyond that. Seems like another nonsensical myth to me.
I know how you could solve it with one guy left. One from your team run down and stands next to him, then you can shoot him and your teammate runs back xD
Fonveh wrote:Do you have any source on this?
I know certain ammunition (multi-purpose rounds) is restricted against personell, but I don't think there are any restrictions beyond that. Seems like another nonsensical myth to me.
-One captain, two lieutenants and a sergeant. I've been going through the NATO rules online but it's always so hard to find what you're looking for.
Make Norway OPFOR! NAO!
It's your hamster Richard. It's your hamster in the box and it's not breathing.
The .50cal restricted against person(ell) is a myth. Norwegians have used MP-T round against taliban in Afghanistan during Operation Karez and Operation Harekate Yolo. However the sharpshooters were investigated after that mission.
-Edit, missed the preview button-
The accusations was dropped after the Norwegian Contigent Commander, the Norwegian forces commander in Afghanistan, supported the sharpshooters in their act against taleban.
Last edited by johnandreas on 2008-09-26 18:54, edited 1 time in total.
I recently stumbled over your project and the first thing I thought about was the former mod "northern conflict". The guys produced a huge amount of content for BF2 including KNM Fridtjof Nansen, BV206, NASAMS II, GBU-12 and many, many more pieces of work. All I know is that the team discussed to switch the engine (crysis) in 2007 but since that thread has been started at their forum nothing has happend to the mod or the website. Maybe you can arrange a cooperation or use some content?
Unfortunatelly my virus scanner says that the website is infected with
"Trojan.JS.Agent.dd"
:/
If anybody wants to try (own risk!!!!): http:// nc.spillutvikling. net.
What is your point BFG punkbuster, you saying that they have copy this illegal. Why do you go so out so hard, almost sounds like you are envious. Anyway, Here (halvor - Viewing Profile) you can se a familiar name, who is the leader (I think) for this mod.
Keep up the good work, but is it posible to get snowy uniforms?
As the last article states, "sedvanerettslig grunnlag" means that you can't engadge an enemy with this type of ammunition. But you can use whatever you have if they have engadged you. And just to make things more confusing CV9030 with it's 30mm Multi-purpose munition have no "restrictions" against personell.
The rules are just shit why follow them when they dont follow them :S
Its okay to no engage mosques and not try to bomb villages and civilians, but when you talk about what ammounition to use it goes alittle overhand.
People don't realize that autism doesn't mean they're "stupid". Just socially inept. Like rhino... > > or in a worst case scenario... Wicca. =)- Lithium fox
I found this sentence quite funny and since this is a war game forum I will put it here. No offense to the french just a good laugh.
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."
A.G.Strøm-Erichsen wrote:Jeg er uenig i at det er en dobbelthet i regelverket her. Noen taktiske valg tas på bakken, og de må man i etterkant gjennomgå.
For the non-Norwegians here, this is about the rules about using "multi-purpose" ammunition (primarily designed to take out "hard" targets), and our Minister of Defence says, "I disagree with there being a duality in the rules here. Some tactical choices are made on the ground, and those must be reviewed later."
So what she says is that Norwegian snipers are allowed to use multi-purpose ammunition against people, but the politicians in charge are perfectly within their rights to punish them for it if they see fit to cover their arses. Love Norwegian politicians.
More guns and bullets make bad guys go away faster, which in turn makes everyone in the area safer. -Paul Howe
Zimmer wrote:The rules are just shit why follow them when they dont follow them :S
No offence, but thats a really shitty way to think...
"Why cant we kill POVs when our enemies do?"
"Why cant we rape pillage and kill when our enemies do?"
[R-MOD]KP wrote:Love this bit of politicians' speak:
For the non-Norwegians here, this is about the rules about using "multi-purpose" ammunition (primarily designed to take out "hard" targets), and our Minister of Defence says, "I disagree with there being a duality in the rules here. Some tactical choices are made on the ground, and those must be reviewed later."
So what she says is that Norwegian snipers are allowed to use multi-purpose ammunition against people, but the politicians in charge are perfectly within their rights to punish them for it if they see fit to cover their arses. Love Norwegian politicians.
Hehe, i liked that too
Never argue with an idiot, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you by experience
Jaymz
