The case against Al Basrah

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Caboosehatesbabies
Posts: 335
Joined: 2008-08-25 19:01

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Caboosehatesbabies »

TeRR0R wrote:there is not too much armor on basrah.
Sure, armor pwns on open terrain, but nowhere else!
An additional problem (in .80) is the 50% reduced amount of bombcars (per hour), only 1 IED and lack of ammo.
Yet, there is soooooooooooooo much open terrain terror. This wouldn't be so bad if the city was like 1/2 the size of ramiel, and there was open terrain between the airbase and the city, which is what I believe the upcoming falujhia map is set up like. However, the "city" in Al Basrah is about 2 blocks with wide streets APC's and tanks can camp from the relative safety of the open desert. I mean, I've done this, sat in a tank north of mosque, and just raped anything that tried to cross the road and there was nothing the INS could do.

This boils down to that Al Basrah is showing its age. It was not designed for post .8 PR, and I doubt .85 will fix that, which it shouldn't in my opinion. The map either needs to be out or redesigned. Personally, I wouldn't mine a new GB vs INS map.
Everyone wants to easily kill their opponent but nobody wants to be the one easily killed. That line of thinking escalates weaponry to the point where practically every soldier has a shoulder-mounted nuke launcher that when fired, automatically displays the text "pwnt".- [R-CON]Wolfe

Image
Alex6714
Posts: 3900
Joined: 2007-06-15 22:47

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Alex6714 »

There is only too much armour on basrah if you as insurgent go out into the open.
"Today's forecast calls for 30mm HE rain with a slight chance of hellfires"


"oh, they're fire and forget all right...they're fired then they forget where the target is"
TeRR0R
Posts: 451
Joined: 2007-10-20 10:33

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by TeRR0R »

Hey Caboose, when Al Basrah is sooo bad, why did you ever played at BA for about 220 hours?

I think you just have problems with the recent gameplay changes, not the map itself.

We play Basrah V2 at Battlearena now and the player numbers tell us:
It's still a great map!
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by gazzthompson »

[R-CON]Alex6714 wrote:There is only too much armour on basrah if you as insurgent go out into the open.
which u have to when cache is in village
Caboosehatesbabies
Posts: 335
Joined: 2008-08-25 19:01

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Caboosehatesbabies »

TeRR0R wrote:Hey Caboose, when Al Basrah is sooo bad, why did you ever played at BA for about 220 hours?

I think you just have problems with the recent gameplay changes, not the map itself.

We play Basrah V2 at Battlearena now and the player numbers tell us:
It's still a great map!

That's pretty much what I've been saying Terror, Basrah was good in .75, but the changes of .8, which I largely support, makes the map totally unblanced.

It's the fact the map wasn't designed for .8 is what makes the unmodified version bad.
[R-CON]Alex6714 wrote:There is only too much armour on basrah if you as insurgent go out into the open.

True, however, often the game forces you out into the open, with cache spawns to the north near the double bridge, in the village, and in the fields. The fact that the city is so small and is divided in two by a large road with no cover that can be nearly 75 percent covered by one piece of armor at both ends doesn't help either.
Everyone wants to easily kill their opponent but nobody wants to be the one easily killed. That line of thinking escalates weaponry to the point where practically every soldier has a shoulder-mounted nuke launcher that when fired, automatically displays the text "pwnt".- [R-CON]Wolfe

Image
Jigsaw
Posts: 4498
Joined: 2008-09-15 02:31

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Jigsaw »

Lol caboose we all know that ur just a Ramiel whore :p

Seriously tho they are 2 different maps, Al Bas i think is still good fun the major problem is simply the lack of more spawn locations, and the ease with which the Brits can cut the INS off from their bombcars.

This (hopefully) will be fixed :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CKjNcSUNt8
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "
krekc
Posts: 281
Joined: 2007-02-23 15:28

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by krekc »

I would suggest that the Brits have to hold VCP to gain intel, no check point, no intel - should be the same for all insurgency maps. at least one area that the coalition forces have to hold to be able to receive intel..
'Never in the field of human contact has so much been fired at so many by so few' - Apache Helicopter pilot Steve James
OkitaMakoto
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9368
Joined: 2006-05-25 20:57

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by OkitaMakoto »

jigsaw-uk wrote:Lol caboose we all know that ur just a Ramiel whore :p
You say that like it's a bad thing ;)
ralfidude
Posts: 2351
Joined: 2007-12-25 00:40

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by ralfidude »

Yeah you know, that the changes are in favor of the brits, not the insurgents. For insurgents they have a hard time enough trying to defend these caches. Something should lower the power of the brits like krects pointed out. VCP protection or something sounds like a good balance comeback to me! lol, but il go with battlearena v2 as pointed out for now.
Image
Jigsaw
Posts: 4498
Joined: 2008-09-15 02:31

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Jigsaw »

[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto wrote:You say that like it's a bad thing ;)
Lol nope its a top map, but its not the only good map for insurgency others like Al Bas simply offer a different challenge :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CKjNcSUNt8
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like... victory. Someday this war's gonna end... "
fuzzhead
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7463
Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by fuzzhead »

I would suggest that the Brits have to hold VCP to gain intel, no check point, no intel - should be the same for all insurgency maps. at least one area that the coalition forces have to hold to be able to receive intel..
Interesting idea, and might be possible.... but should be careful it doesnt turn into a King of The VCP like previous versions were..
Blakeman
Posts: 450
Joined: 2007-11-21 20:49

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Blakeman »

Why not make it like Korrengal where to get the best vehicles for the Brits they have to control the VCP? If this were done I would move the VCP more toward the south end of town near the overpass, so that the Brits have to go through ambush territory in order to even get to it. Then they must hold it in order to keep the better vehicles.

I believe the brits do not need the Heavy Tanks and would suggest instead that they have two helos instead, 2 scimitars, 2 warriors, 2 supply trucks and 2 land rovers.

Possibly put a spawn in the village and give the south side of the road near village more houses and also give village a few houses that aren't destroyable.
fuzzhead
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7463
Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by fuzzhead »

Thats also something that were considering for v0.85 al basrah blakeman.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Rhino »

with also shoving a fixed bunker in there which can be a "mini objective" also for the insurgents to take out and would give a little more incentive for brits to defend it, but wouldn't have the old King of the Hill like in .6
Image
Marmorkaka
Posts: 110
Joined: 2007-11-15 17:48

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Marmorkaka »

To much armour, to few rpgs, to few spawn points, to many caches to defend no vcp. Who wants to sit on a chache for 20 min only to be raped by a apc and having to walk for 5 min to be raped again?
Image
Todays gratitude buys tomorrows happines.
Portable.Cougar
Posts: 1192
Joined: 2007-03-03 01:47

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Portable.Cougar »

I like it.

I get a diffrent fight almost every round.
Image
TeRR0R
Posts: 451
Joined: 2007-10-20 10:33

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by TeRR0R »

VCP is a bad idea.
Even without vcp it's hard enough to find all caches.
If there is any objective in the VCP there will be a tendency that half of the team will sit there and do not search for caches.
This is what happened in older versions.

I suggest to just fix the minor gameplay issues before major changes should happen.
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Rudd »

I don't get the insurgent view on VCP, they always just rush it, give me a squad of brits with a marksman LAT and one 50cal, and there isn't an insurgent that can get in, especially if a scimmy is nearby.

When insurgent, just get your RPGs and snipe the VCP, mortar it, LMG it, then hide, reload and do it again, you'll either keep the brits down or dead.

One squad defending the VCP gives so many strategic boons to the British that is just plain crazy not to hold it.
Image
Killer-Ape
Posts: 387
Joined: 2007-02-26 16:00

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Killer-Ape »

Dr2B Rudd wrote:I don't get the insurgent view on VCP, they always just rush it, give me a squad of brits with a marksman LAT and one 50cal, and there isn't an insurgent that can get in, especially if a scimmy is nearby.

When insurgent, just get your RPGs and snipe the VCP, mortar it, LMG it, then hide, reload and do it again, you'll either keep the brits down or dead.

One squad defending the VCP gives so many strategic boons to the British that is just plain crazy not to hold it.
I agree, usually you get all the intel points needed to win a game just from insurgents trying to storm the VCP. And they even send stupid civilians to boost your tickets.

But to do this you need a very dedicated squad that follows orders.
Blakeman
Posts: 450
Joined: 2007-11-21 20:49

Re: The case against Al Basrah

Post by Blakeman »

That is why I would put it in a different location like near the southern overpass. If the VCP is required to get helos and apcs like korrengal with laniyal and the stryker and helo then it would be a more important objective for both sides.

The insurgents would always get down to it first making for a big fight in for the brits and a lot of opportunity for ambush. The brits wouldn't have to take it, but it will make their mission a lot easier just like with the US and Korrengal.

Rhino, I wouldn't put a bunker in there but make the brits set up a bunker there themselves so that it is rather difficult.

Making the 'better' vehicles a bit hard for the brits does a few things...

Evens the field at the beginning of the game.
No more omg1337tankorz! complaints from the insurgency.
Gives something for the brits to defend.
Gives something for the insurgency to attack.

I would take out the C2 Tank personally as it is a bit powerful and I have never seen it driven into the city which makes for a very hard time IEDing it or trying to hit it anywhere with an rpg effectively. The APCs are hard enough, and the scimitar is awesome in that it can go anywhere a jeep can go so the brits should have enough. I would give them the another helo in order to make them more mobile, but make helos only spawn if the VCP is controlled.

If insurgency gets more spawns and a few different places for vehicles to spawn, this map would turn from great to friggin spectacular.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”