HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Post by **OkitaMakoto** » 2008-12-29 08:42

Come again, Yassin? Make what more...tactical?

sakils2 · Post by **sakils2** » 2008-12-29 08:57

Tactical...? Ok...

Looks like 0.85 gonna be full with awesome!!!! YAY
<3 DEV's

Post by **Jaymz** » 2008-12-29 14:40

Yasin22 wrote:guys i cant holled my suggestion out any longer can yous make it look tactical if its not too much work (mecs)

Tacticool G3?

KP · Post by KP » 2008-12-29 14:45

'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;882399']Tacticool G3?

Norwegian AG3F2s.

Is the G3 in PR still zeroed to 300 metres? If so, the "number 3" sight should be used, no?

Post by **Jaymz** » 2008-12-29 14:49

[R-MOD]KP wrote:Norwegian AG3F2s.

Is the G3 in PR still zeroed to 300 metres? If so, the "number 3" sight should be used, no?

No guns in PR are actually "zeroed" in the literal sense. So it's nothing to worry about.

Scot · Post by **Scot** » 2008-12-29 14:53

Is that cos of no ballistics?

Post by **OkitaMakoto** » 2008-12-29 15:27

Scot wrote:Is that cos of no ballistics?

Oh, there's ballistics alright.... BF2 ballistics

*heheh oops*

Scot · Post by **Scot** » 2008-12-29 15:30

'[R-DEV wrote:OkitaMakoto;882455']Oh, there's ballistics alright.... BF2 ballistics But that's something else, the topic here is the updated sprint. [search and I'm sure you'll find thread on ballistics if you care to know more]

"Okita you are awesome."

***you saw nothing! Okita did not mistakenly think he was in another thread and say we were going to talk about something that is not the actual topic by saying we need to get back on the topic he thought we should be on!***

Ok, I did...

....

<3 Scot

I wanna edit this post too! Okita is teh n00b!

<3 KP

Post by **OkitaMakoto** » 2008-12-29 15:39

Heh, Im sorry. Had two tabs open and thought someone asked that question in the Sprint DEV journal

Ooops!

KP · Post by KP » 2008-12-29 17:36

[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:No guns in PR are actually "zeroed" in the literal sense. So it's nothing to worry about.

From what I recall, the rounds go straight ahead until they reach the "zero" point, then start dropping. Still, if they are "zeroed", or whatever you want to call it, to 300 metres, they should use the "number 3" sight. Or am I way off?

gazzthompson · Post by **gazzthompson** » 2008-12-29 17:39

[R-MOD]KP wrote:From what I recall, the rounds go straight ahead until they reach the "zero" point, then start dropping. Still, if they are "zeroed", or whatever you want to call it, to 300 metres, they should use the "number 3" sight. Or am I way off?

i *think* the longer the range the smaller the sight picture because it focuses your eye, thats why 300 is bigger than 100 (and that the target is closer so you need bigger sight picture)

might be totally wrong but whatever. unless ur talking in game ? ive confused myself now :S

KP · Post by KP » 2008-12-29 17:43

I'm talking in-game zeroing. Always thought the different apertures were factory-zeroed to 100, 200, 300 and 400 m, respectively IRL. Hence, if the rifles are "zeroed" to 300 m in-game, they should use the 300 m aperture. Though you may be right.

Yasin22 · Post by **Yasin22** » 2008-12-30 08:45

'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;882399']Tacticool G3?

yes thats what i mean u seen the thread i posted about the g3 with a full on rail look

single.shot (nor) · Post by **single.shot (nor)** » 2008-12-30 12:21

i think we either the sights on the G3A3 and soon-to-be AG3A1-2 to the 300 meter aperture, bet the the m16, l85 rifles and so forth also be change the aperture for CQB to the small one

Post by **Hitperson** » 2008-12-30 12:26

oh my MP5 i have all closed sights smallest for long range largest for CQB (would prefer an open sight TBH)

single.shot (nor) · Post by **single.shot (nor)** » 2008-12-30 12:58

your MP5... im no military advisor but what A does it have?? like what configuration, and maybe its an old one, with all-closed irons

Scot · Post by **Scot** » 2008-12-30 13:31

single.shot (nor) wrote:i think we either the sights on the G3A3 and soon-to-be AG3A1-2 to the 300 meter aperture, bet the the m16, l85 rifles and so forth also be change the aperture for CQB to the small one

L85 can change aperture's on the irons version, dunno about the m16 and QBZ, but I would guess so.

Post by **Hitperson** » 2008-12-30 13:57

single.shot (nor) wrote:your MP5... im no military advisor but what A does it have?? like what configuration, and maybe its an old one, with all-closed irons

it's an A3 (i do prefer the SEF grip, so much more ergonomic)

single.shot (nor) · Post by **single.shot (nor)** » 2008-12-30 20:38

on the M16 i am certain of the flipable irons from CQB-LONG range.

mp5-a3 is teh sexiest of 'em all...

Post by **Spec** » 2008-12-30 21:01

single.shot (nor) wrote:mp5-a3 is teh sexiest of 'em all...

A2, A4, SD2 and SD5 look better

Fixed stock looks more like a gun.

Though the A3 is sexier than the A5 indeed.

Are you sure the newer ones with that new trigger group have open sights? I'm not sure about that.

HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)

Re: HK gunsight (a "balanced" approach)