[Vehicle] BMP-3 updates

Locked
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Rudd »

Gonna use this vehicle as the FSG very nicely, need a map designed around it :wink:

good work, looking forward to the patch
Image
Nitneuc
Posts: 490
Joined: 2007-09-16 08:39

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Nitneuc »

To bad that's not really possible in BF2 (is it?)
This is, FH2 did it for the tanks. Unfortunately you can't have 6 outside and 6 inside vehicle passengers slots simultaneously due to BF2 engine limit ; as said above.
Many thanks to everyone involved in the making of the best videogaming experience ever !
LeChuckle
Posts: 664
Joined: 2007-02-09 13:53

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by LeChuckle »

awesome, now lets give the T90 some refleks missiles as well :twisted:
General_J0k3r
Posts: 2051
Joined: 2007-03-02 16:01

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by General_J0k3r »

pure seks

NATO BE AWARE :D
Drude
Posts: 98
Joined: 2008-01-03 07:19

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Drude »

OH YES! This is the update and fix that I have been waiting most of the all.
Deadfast
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4611
Joined: 2007-07-16 16:25

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Deadfast »

SocketMan wrote: I heard a lot of talk about T-90 and BTR90 not being "appropriate",and thus removed from the MEC arsenal in the next release.
Is BMP3 replacing the (T-90) tank or is there something else coming?
(besides the BRDM2/BTR60)
According to Jaymz it will be USI's T-72 for 0.85:
'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;861011']USI's T72-M1 Will be the replacement of the MEC T-90 for 0.85. But that is only temporary, there is a proper modern tank that is in the works in which will take on the role as the MEC's MBT. Sadly, this won't make it in game for 0.85 but it's a top priority for 0.9.
[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:For 0.85 it will just mirror the Abrams. When it gets replaced in 0.9 though, it will be total asymmetry across the board. Both the new PLA/MEC tanks coming in 0.9 will have significantly different traits that will make NATO vs OPFOR tank combat very unique. A front page news post or a dev journal post will be made when both of these tanks are finished and it will go into detail about what I mean.
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Expendable Grunt »

I came a little.
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
LeChuckle
Posts: 664
Joined: 2007-02-09 13:53

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by LeChuckle »

Deadfast wrote:According to Jaymz it will be USI's T-72 for 0.85:

I SMELL ZTZ 99 :15_cheers :15_cheers :15_cheers
LeChuckle
Posts: 664
Joined: 2007-02-09 13:53

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by LeChuckle »

oops, i meant to quote the last two quotes that he quoted
ExisSellos
Posts: 49
Joined: 2007-01-04 17:11

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by ExisSellos »

omg dude
i dont feel good
i think im in love
Some like us most hate us

but they all fear us
Rangu
Posts: 843
Joined: 2007-02-08 14:34

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Rangu »

sweet, sexy and OP!
[R-DEV]Jaymz - If it wasn't for the F-18's incompetence, "Independence Day" would have ended half-way through.
single.shot (nor)
Posts: 692
Joined: 2008-04-12 07:06

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by single.shot (nor) »

fappadelic!
War is a huge matter for a nation. it's the field of life and death, destruction and survival, and such matters cannot be left unstudied. - Sun Tzu
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by agentscar »

Ooo,The M2A2 and this shall duke it out now!!!But I'll make sure I'm in my M2A2,to pwn this thing..lol.

-good job on the BMP guys. :)
Image
Image
Image
sentinel
Posts: 110
Joined: 2008-07-29 16:19

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by sentinel »

You have created a monster! I Love it. Hope see it in maps that arent dominated by MBTs.
"- Jackson_Action"
sn1p3rslippinz
Posts: 58
Joined: 2008-05-29 00:21

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by sn1p3rslippinz »

Yeh great job guys :D
Looking forward to using this bad boy!!
Zoddom
Posts: 1029
Joined: 2008-02-11 15:29

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Zoddom »

wtf? oO NICE...but
how should you fire so much weapons with one mouse?
hall0
Posts: 1700
Joined: 2007-06-09 17:20

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by hall0 »

This thing is so uber :D
sakils2
Posts: 1374
Joined: 2007-07-14 23:15

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by sakils2 »

I just saw a video. As you can see, the small cannon shoots 30 mm. In this video the big cannon shoots 100 mm. My question is. Will there be any delay between 100 mm/AT10 and 30 AP/30 HE?
DeadSmile187
Posts: 172
Joined: 2007-12-17 16:24

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by DeadSmile187 »

I like it :D new Enemy for Nato 8)
Image
Image
"We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem!"
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em."
Tannhauser
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2007-11-22 03:06

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3

Post by Tannhauser »

On about those asking if it is the *main* APC for MEC ; Factions (like IRL) are not restricted to have only one type of *main* APC. So seeing MEC having imported BTRs (60-80 or 90) and BMP-3s is fine for me. ;)

I suppose there are chances of seeing a large combined ops map with Russian Forces that would have BTR-90's, and BMP-3's in the future (0.9?). Even tho Russian doctrine is to send the older stuff first... For simulations sake? :smile:
«Hollywood jackasses who insist on spending seriously huge amounts of money to make films that even my cat won't watch. And he'll happily sit in the bathroom and watch me shit.»
- [R-DEV]Masaq
Locked

Return to “2009”