[AAR] New use for the tanks

Post by **Deadfast** » 2009-02-02 22:47

Except it's not T-90 but T-72

laikiunreal · Post by **laikiunreal** » 2009-02-02 22:51

ChizNizzle wrote:No, it should be only MEC - McGyver is one of them. or MEC - They have gadgets.

lol

laikiunreal · Post by **laikiunreal** » 2009-02-02 22:52

Deadfast wrote:Except it's not T-90 but T-72

nah i think is a T-90...

Vehicles:MEC - Project Reality Guide

Post by **bosco_** » 2009-02-02 22:54

MEC got the T-72 with 0.85, which will be upgraded to T-72M lateron.

HeXeY · Post by **HeXeY** » 2009-02-02 23:17

Romagnolo, I hereby baptize you MecGyver!

(Not sure if those are the right words to use)

HughJass · Post by **HughJass** » 2009-02-04 00:08

dude...

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2009-02-04 01:23

Nice one!!!

akatabrask · Post by **akatabrask** » 2009-02-04 12:48

Lol, allways fun when people think outside the box like that

Salah ad Din · Post by **Salah ad Din** » 2009-02-04 18:38

Try that in the tournament, and next match you'll have a rule forbidding it.

But yeah, very nice, shame we didn't think of it first.

Post by **Outlawz7** » 2009-02-04 18:42

That's because the T90's cannon does not have a collision mesh, ergo no walking on top of it as you fall through.

DannyIMK · Post by **DannyIMK** » 2009-02-05 12:01

nice,i got idea for bridge vehicle
a kind of armored vehicle, and the cannon is an bridge big for jeeps inf etc(or only inf)

bondsan · Post by **bondsan** » 2009-02-08 11:37

nice one mate, thats another one for the book of tricks

LeChuckle · Post by **LeChuckle** » 2009-02-08 23:43

bloodthirsty_viking wrote:lol, i bet they owuld do that in rl if they had insta-death razorwire to!

or hideouts 20 ft tall!!!!
heres my proof (ok.. its 15 foot....)

yeah i do it all the time... usually when placing hideout in the air while jumping

-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba · Post by **-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba** » 2009-02-09 00:06

next well see two tanks giving a bridge for vehicles. anyone tries to bring a tank in the inner bunker complex so......

Sadist_Cain · Post by **Sadist_Cain** » 2009-02-09 07:11

Imagine if they slipped, legs akimbo.... *shudder*

stozzcheese · Post by **stozzcheese** » 2009-02-11 12:23

HeXeY wrote:Romagnolo, I hereby baptize you MecGyver!

(Not sure if those are the right words to use)

haha next time hes going to make a boat on qwai with toothpicks, a poster of fernando torres and 3 liters of jet fuel

TimeMasheen · Post by **TimeMasheen** » 2009-02-15 15:20

cant wait till the day me and you go up against eachother in 1 to 1 tank combat ;D

That round was in the Abrams,

Must have killed over 10 T72s around 6 bmps and 3 Mec Attack helo's (mi-28?)

torenico · Post by **torenico** » 2009-02-17 04:10

Oh ya, we did this in vBF2 in old times, whit the T90, against the damn wall hackers, we put a C4 on the cannon, usually the cannon will appear inside the Building we are targetting, and BOOM, hacker is dead.

But whats a good tactic sir!

mp5punk · Post by **mp5punk** » 2009-02-19 03:06

lol thats awesome!

[AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks

Re: [AAR] New use for the tanks