[Map] Sangin - Update

Locked
Bad1n
Posts: 32
Joined: 2008-01-22 13:55

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Bad1n »

Looking PERFECT!
marcoelnk
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1581
Joined: 2007-03-03 11:30

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by marcoelnk »

'[R-DEV wrote:Dr Rank;952848']Don't worry. you'll get your CAS, I've got all the gamemodes worked out, they just need seting up and testing for balance issue etc. But CAS is an crucial part of the fighting out there, so it will be included.

The basic plan of attack for the British in the insurgency gamemode will be to move out in WIMIKs to hunt down the Taliban and destroy their weapons caches. They will also be able to manouver around in Chinooks (which will also provide supplies to the front lines), and probably have additional fire support provided by the Scimitars. It is incredibly difficult to spot troops on the ground due to the huge amount of ground cover, especially over any kind of distance. The Taliban will be able to dig in around the compound where the cache is located and put up a strong ground defence, with rally points being very difficult to spot and plenty of RPGs, IEDs etc available, if the Brits just try to stroll up in their WIMIKS they are going to have a very tough time of it. As the WIMIKS get closer to the Taliban position they will become incredibly vulnerable to RPG and small arms fire. The best way to utilise the WIMIKS will be to do what soldiers usually do with them in real life and set them up on some high ground as an FSG (Fire Support Group) to help provide covering/suppressive fire for the troops on the ground. In addition, once the Taliban positions have been IDed, the British can then call in CAS (which will vary depending on the Gameplay Layer) to take them out, a move which can be swiftly followed up by ground troops moving in. All of the caches will be located inside compounds, so they cannot simply be taken out by the air power, they will all require troops to move in and clear out the compounds on foot. Fire support can also be given on a squad level, with squads utilising other nearby compounds to lay down fire, and set up more temporary FOBs (i.e. build a fire base/defences there).

That's only the tip of the iceberg in regards to realism in the gamemodes, but it should give you all some idea where I'm heading with this. Like I've said before, a huge amount of research and planning has gone into this. Hopefully we should see the rewards of this when the map is released :)
but with being it an insurgency map i think its too easy for lets say an a-10 to take out the enemies. as soon as the marker popos up on the minimap it will simply wipe out the whole area around , killing everyone who tries to move out from where the cache is well hidden and protected. so basically this does not give the insurgents any time to actually fulfil the procedures you mentioned ( IEDs , rpgs ,etc).
I think the best way to prevent this is a mixture of AAS and insurgency ( with more than 1 flag like on ramial but maybe fewer caches ) or even better the scenario gamemode.
Image
Tannhauser
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2007-11-22 03:06

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Tannhauser »

[R-CON]marcoelnk wrote:but with being it an insurgency map i think its too easy for lets say an a-10 to take out the enemies. as soon as the marker popos up on the minimap it will simply wipe out the whole area around , killing everyone who tries to move out from where the cache is well hidden and protected. so basically this does not give the insurgents any time to actually fulfil the procedures you mentioned ( IEDs , rpgs ,etc).
I think the best way to prevent this is a mixture of AAS and insurgency ( with more than 1 flag like on ramial but maybe fewer caches ) or even better the scenario gamemode.
The problem is if you add a flag, it will just need infantry to defend it, aircrafts will still rape and it'll be worse because there will be less infantry hunting caches.

But honestly, this map is promising! I can see it'll be hard for Rank to make this map work properly and be the least balanced with all those assets, but I believe he'll do great work out of this nonetheless.
«Hollywood jackasses who insist on spending seriously huge amounts of money to make films that even my cat won't watch. And he'll happily sit in the bathroom and watch me shit.»
- [R-DEV]Masaq
Mora
Posts: 2933
Joined: 2007-08-21 12:37

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Mora »

ins/taliban just need to play it smart and stay hidden and set IEDs and other ambushes. Thats the way they do it irl.
Dr Rank
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 2765
Joined: 2006-11-11 15:05

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Dr Rank »

Don't stress about assets and gamesmodes lads, I've got it all in hand. Yeah, Insurgency should get tweaked for large maps, trying to stretch a defence across 3 caches in a 4km environment just won't work. I'm thinking one cache at a time to keep everything focused and get some intense combat. This will also mean CAS will generally be needed because there could be as many as 32 Taliban dug in defending. This is the sort of thing that gets tweaked and finalised in testing.

So basically, don't worry, I've got it all in hand, like I said, I'll release some more gameplay info at a later date. All of the gamemode layers have already been planned and will just need some testing once the map is complete.
Image
Image
Image
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by gazzthompson »

'[R-DEV wrote:Dr Rank;954675']Don't stress about assets and gamesmodes lads, I've got it all in hand. Yeah, Insurgency should get tweaked for large maps, trying to stretch a defence across 3 caches in a 4km environment just won't work. I'm thinking one cache at a time to keep everything focused and get some intense combat. This will also mean CAS will generally be needed because there could be as many as 32 Taliban dug in defending. This is the sort of thing that gets tweaked and finalised in testing.
.
i was worried about that, but it seems you have it sorted :-o

1 cache at a time, and make sure taliban know what next cache will be so it gives them time to set up defenses on the next one if wiped out?
THE.FIST
Posts: 2036
Joined: 2007-07-11 23:00

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by THE.FIST »

probably nice map gj
Dr Rank
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 2765
Joined: 2006-11-11 15:05

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Dr Rank »

gazzthompson wrote:1 cache at a time, and make sure taliban know what next cache will be so it gives them time to set up defenses on the next one if wiped out?
Yep, that's the plan, for the standard gamemodes anyway... ;)
Image
Image
Image
Cptkanito
Posts: 384
Joined: 2008-08-31 12:06

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Cptkanito »

[R-DEV]Dr Rank wrote:Don't stress about assets and gamesmodes lads, I've got it all in hand. Yeah, Insurgency should get tweaked for large maps, trying to stretch a defence across 3 caches in a 4km environment just won't work. I'm thinking one cache at a time to keep everything focused and get some intense combat. This will also mean CAS will generally be needed because there could be as many as 32 Taliban dug in defending. This is the sort of thing that gets tweaked and finalised in testing.

So basically, don't worry, I've got it all in hand, like I said, I'll release some more gameplay info at a later date. All of the gamemode layers have already been planned and will just need some testing once the map is complete.
But surely this would be difficult if theres 32 Taliban in the same place, i mean it would take a while to bring down those defenses. Mind you, one LGB should do the trick for 30seconds before they all respawn :)
Image
Image
gazzthompson
Posts: 8012
Joined: 2007-01-12 19:05

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by gazzthompson »

to my understanding, it was very difficult IRL. feel the CAS/FSG will be deciding factor (hope so anyways)
Cheditor
Posts: 2331
Joined: 2009-03-01 14:35

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Cheditor »

Can't wait for this map, have barely been able to play as the brits since i downloaded PR.
By the way great job on the map looks really realistic.
greenfire07
Posts: 40
Joined: 2007-07-31 01:24

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by greenfire07 »

not to be too hard, but it looks like i'll be doing a lot of needless walking through fields, the whole while hoping someone will shoot at me.
Image
All that good must do for evil to succeed, is nothing.
M_Striker
Posts: 513
Joined: 2008-05-31 00:36

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by M_Striker »

Looks very nice and promising for realistic close air support.
MarineSeaknight
Posts: 287
Joined: 2008-01-08 16:12

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by MarineSeaknight »

Absolutely beautiful Rank!

Can't wait to test this baby out.
Image
[PR Forums] [Contact an Admin] [Kicked/Banned from TG?]

PR Testing Team: Serious Business

Waiting for Reapar to become a DEV before I can quote him.
masterceo
Posts: 1914
Joined: 2008-08-25 23:00

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by masterceo »

greenfire07 wrote:not to be too hard, but it looks like i'll be doing a lot of needless walking through fields, the whole while hoping someone will shoot at me.
i think that it will give PR another layer of immersion, i mean imagine you are on a patrol to hunt down the taliban, and suddenly you become ambushed. i think that this will be one of these maps that you will really feel that you're a part of some real operation, not just a frag fest.

Priby:Why cant i be norwegian?
H.sta:becouse we are a specially selected bunch of people created by god to show how awsome mankind can be
arjan
Posts: 1865
Joined: 2007-04-21 12:32

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by arjan »

Couldnt said it any better i think masterceo :)
A.English
Posts: 29
Joined: 2007-11-15 10:43

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by A.English »

0o i see Brits!!!! Wot about as its helmand putting in some new Jackels and Masschiffs??.... (one day) =) good work tho
Squad leader of "UKSFD VOIP" Squad. Founder of 1st Armoured Division =1ADV=
scandhi
Posts: 293
Joined: 2006-02-02 20:53

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by scandhi »

Super mario brothers: Nothing beats reality like killing turtles while high on shrooms and flying with a cape
McBumLuv
Posts: 3563
Joined: 2008-08-31 02:48

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by McBumLuv »

And apparently... Minstrels to? :D
Image

Image

Image
Cptkanito
Posts: 384
Joined: 2008-08-31 12:06

Re: [MAP] Sangin - Update

Post by Cptkanito »

McLuv wrote:And apparently... Minstrels to? :D
Lolage :D
Image
Image
Locked

Return to “2009”