Vodnik should be amphibious

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Wheelman56
Posts: 5
Joined: 2006-03-26 13:09

Vodnik should be amphibious

Post by Wheelman56 »

Dunno if this has been pointed out before, but in real life the Vodnik is amphibious. I was hoping to see so in the mod, maybe in a later release?
Lucractius
Posts: 83
Joined: 2006-05-02 14:34

Post by Lucractius »

hrm if you suddenly make one sides thing amphibious, they get a bit of an advantage you know...
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

I still think it would be a nice feature for it to have as it dose IRL.
Image
Pence
Posts: 2248
Joined: 2006-02-04 06:10

Post by Pence »

The BF2 Vodnik is a different thing compared to the real ones. They need slight modifications before they can go swiming too.
"I am not bald, i shave my head"
Image
"How could you falter when you're the rock of Gibraltar"
Alex L.
Posts: 225
Joined: 2006-01-19 21:38

Post by Alex L. »

Most jeeps can be submurged until a certain level, as long as the engine (and engine intake/exaust) are dry. That goes for certain tanks, too. The brittish challanger 2 can almost be completely submurged and still function properly.
Pence
Posts: 2248
Joined: 2006-02-04 06:10

Post by Pence »

The Sweedish S-Tank's have the ability to cross river's with a 'shower curtain' attachment.
"I am not bald, i shave my head"
Image
"How could you falter when you're the rock of Gibraltar"
Malik
Posts: 1676
Joined: 2006-04-20 16:49

Post by Malik »

I think something needs to be done about jeeps magically catching fire and exploding in water. It's kinda like the good old GTA physic that caused upturned vehicles to burst into flame. I don't like having to flee my vehicle as soon as it starts floating for fear of being blown up. :(
[T]Terranova7
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2005-06-19 20:28

Post by [T]Terranova7 »

No doubt, the Vodnik should be amphibous. I've pointed this out in other topics, but I think for 0.4 the Vodnik should be capable of crossing water. Just make sure there not on maps like the Gulf of Oman 32 and 64 versions. Otherwise an entire squad takes a trip to the carrier and causes mass havoc.

Perhaps, since the MEC conflict is liekly to take place several years from now, we could implement the TAGS gunner shields onto the U.S Humvees. Its a reality mod, and I'm sure several years from now we'll have some new technology at front lines.

http://www.na.baesystems.com/releasesDetail.cfm?a=408
Image
Malik
Posts: 1676
Joined: 2006-04-20 16:49

Post by Malik »

And what of the poor chinese and their converted pickup trucks? :(
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

They don't get swimming veichels. If veichels can submerge in R/L i would like to see in mod not sure how it would be implented so they can't go underwater and keep going for example on the HMMVW or whatever but would be cool to see.
Armand61685
Posts: 427
Joined: 2005-05-06 09:14

Post by Armand61685 »

Lucractius wrote:hrm if you suddenly make one sides thing amphibious, they get a bit of an advantage you know...
who cares man? Not everything is supposed to be cookie cutter equivalents of eachother.
My PR ingame name is Pvt.Nouri.
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

Armand61685 wrote:who cares man? Not everything is supposed to be cookie cutter equivalents of eachother.
Exactly.
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

Exactly, this is realism not VBF2 balance everything and up end with ****. Still we want decent gameplay.
AznLB
Posts: 475
Joined: 2006-02-13 21:01

Post by AznLB »

Considering the inferior weapons the MEC gets, an amphibious Vodnik wouldn't hurt.

No need to restrict it to certain maps either, it's basically just a weaker, less armored APC.
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

What is the motive force for the vodnik when it is in the water.
Cerberus
Posts: 2727
Joined: 2005-11-15 22:24

Post by Cerberus »

AznLB wrote:Considering the inferior weapons the MEC gets, an amphibious Vodnik wouldn't hurt.

No need to restrict it to certain maps either, it's basically just a weaker, less armored APC.
Indeed.
"Practice proves more than theory, in any case."

- Abraham Lincoln


"i so regret searching "giant hentai penis" on google images though ;_;"

- Garabaldi
Malik
Posts: 1676
Joined: 2006-04-20 16:49

Post by Malik »

It'll need a completely new model then. The one in game is just a slimmer version built more like a van. The back door is wide open and goes down to the floor.

And I'll repeat, what of the Najing? It's not only the weakest and most unprotected of the three jeeps, but now it's disadvantaged by the amphibious Vodnik. Perhaps three distinct advantages could be built from this. The hummer is the best armoured one, the Vodnik is able to get wet harmlessly, so what do we add to the Najing?

Ooh, how about a support rifle mounted on the dashboard for the front passenger like the light jeeps. That'd give the guy in front somthing better to do...
dunkellic
Posts: 1809
Joined: 2006-02-07 15:41

Post by dunkellic »

well, i think that (in reality) the vodnik would be even better armored as the humvee, which isn´t that armored at all
Pence
Posts: 2248
Joined: 2006-02-04 06:10

Post by Pence »

Malik wrote: And I'll repeat, what of the Najing? It's not only the weakest and most unprotected of the three jeeps, but now it's disadvantaged by the amphibious Vodnik. Perhaps three distinct advantages could be built from this. The hummer is the best armoured one, the Vodnik is able to get wet harmlessly, so what do we add to the Najing?
Stick paper wings on it, we will see flying Jap's yet! ... Oo, erm; Chineese* :-?
"I am not bald, i shave my head"
Image
"How could you falter when you're the rock of Gibraltar"
Lucractius
Posts: 83
Joined: 2006-05-02 14:34

Post by Lucractius »

its slightly faster? give it the ability to carry another guy... surely theres something for the Najing
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”