AH-1 pilot at a disadvantage

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
Zoot
Posts: 2
Joined: 2006-05-13 14:03

AH-1 pilot at a disadvantage

Post by Zoot »

I think this mod is great. I love the enhanced gameplay!
But.. there is one quirky issue - being the pilot of a Ah-1 cobra!
Since you cant turn the internal cockpit view off and just view the HUD anymore, AH-1 pilots are stuck looking at the back of their gunner's heads.
Now these heads take up a hefty portion of the pilots vision and make flying very very difficult, and lining up shots even more difficult, because you cant see the target youre suppose to be lined up to.

Moreover, this is a blance issue too, because the Mi-28 doesnt have this problem. The gunner is seated way under the pilot and does not obstruct his view on that chopper.

Could we get a fix for this?
the.ultimate.maverick
Posts: 1229
Joined: 2006-02-19 23:49

Post by the.ultimate.maverick »

Well i'd like more bias towards the MEc and PLA for as it stands they are severely disadvantaged on the battlefield.
Image
Zoot
Posts: 2
Joined: 2006-05-13 14:03

Post by Zoot »

Yeah, but dont you think blocking out half the vision of the cobra pilot is a bit overkill? Seriously, I kept slamming in to the ground and buildings.
JellyBelly
Posts: 1309
Joined: 2005-12-20 13:41

Post by JellyBelly »

It' not that hard. Just keep some decent height. Im able to manage just fine.
Image
[RGG] - Pte.Phillips - http://www.rggsquad.co.uk - Arma ftw
Really Gay Guy

America was a tad late into the First World War. They redeemed themself's and came in slightly sooner in the Second. Now they seem determined to start the Third.
Happy
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1807
Joined: 2005-11-07 02:43

Post by Happy »

I have never flown using the views beside the on with in the cockpit with the copilot in front of me and I am a pretty good pilot.
Proud Killer of 38 Spambots.
Image
Image
After much intense calculation, it has been decided that your thread is already in the forum that you wish to move it to. Deep Thought should be jealous. - Moderator Control Panel
Eden
Posts: 805
Joined: 2005-12-06 14:43

Post by Eden »

I have also never flown with any other view other than the cockpit view and its never really bothered my, the altitude meter does serve a purpous and it always works for me. You also tend to get the feal of where everything is after a while anyway.
Fullforce
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3751
Joined: 2005-10-17 17:03

Post by Fullforce »

I think this comes down to your situational awareness while playing a game - whether you know how big your vehicle is, its ability to fly, gunner views, flying past something and knowing its location behind you, hearing sounds and knowing where they are, stuff like that.
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Post by Hitperson »

'[R-PUB wrote:Fullforce']I think this comes down to your situational awareness while playing a game - whether you know how big your vehicle is, its ability to fly, gunner views, flying past something and knowing its location behind you, hearing sounds and knowing where they are, stuff like that.

when i had PR working i had awsom situational awareness in a black hawki was flying under the bridges in Mashur city (the low ones.)
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
Campez
Posts: 510
Joined: 2005-10-29 13:51

Post by Campez »

I think its more easy to actually see how big your chopper is :D plus its good looking when the co-pilot is moving hes head :D
Dark Ewok
Posts: 193
Joined: 2006-04-29 19:54

Post by Dark Ewok »

I aggree with the posters above. Flying with only the cockpit view is not a problem. What IS a problem is the fact that I keep getting shot down... :(
:lol:
I can zip under bridges land on the ledge in the welldeck on the carrier. (where you get to the boats or LAVs)
My point is, just keep at it and you'll eventually get used to it.
Image

Image
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Post by Hitperson »

Dark Ewok wrote:I aggree with the posters above. Flying with only the cockpit view is not a problem. What IS a problem is the fact that I keep getting shot down... :(
:lol:
I can zip under bridges land on the ledge in the welldeck on the carrier. (where you get to the boats or LAVs)
My point is, just keep at it and you'll eventually get used to it.

as some one probably once said practice makes perfect-what is the point in learning to do somthing if it takes no skill at all??
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
Armand61685
Posts: 427
Joined: 2005-05-06 09:14

Post by Armand61685 »

'[R-PUB wrote:maverick']Well i'd like more bias towards the MEc and PLA for as it stands they are severely disadvantaged on the battlefield.

No. Not everything in war is balanced. This mod is about REALITY, project REALITY.

Skill and perseverance would make mec and PLA win over sheer technology.
My PR ingame name is Pvt.Nouri.
Malik
Posts: 1676
Joined: 2006-04-20 16:49

Post by Malik »

Just so you know, project REALITY is for BATTLEFIELD 2 and BATTLEFIELD 2 is a GAME and GAMES by definition are for ENTERTAINMENT no matter what their objective is so in this case I think ENTERTAINMENT takes precidence over REALITY because NOBODY likes to LOSE because some fool wanted REALISM over FUN.
the.ultimate.maverick
Posts: 1229
Joined: 2006-02-19 23:49

Post by the.ultimate.maverick »

Armand61685 wrote:No. Not everything in war is balanced. This mod is about REALITY, project REALITY.

Skill and perseverance would make mec and PLA win over sheer technology.
In RL the MEC would not be in a force together - many nations hate each other as much as they hate America. Furthermore - an organised force? come on!

Whatr you would have in Oman is 4,000,000 Jihaders with AKs - so shall we set the tickets like that......
Image
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

yeah there we go US sits in veichles and mows down Jihaders till one gets through and kills them.
Kitoro
Posts: 121
Joined: 2006-03-06 08:14

Post by Kitoro »

I for one think its a great view.. heres why.
I depend on my gunner for where the threat is and pay great attention to where they are focused. Just my experience. In a way the gunner is my HAT controls, seeing how i use a flightstick.
OverwatchX
Posts: 258
Joined: 2005-07-10 20:53

Post by OverwatchX »

I like the way it is in the mod. No external views or invisible cockpits! Please keep as is.
mavit
Posts: 248
Joined: 2006-04-06 17:32

Post by mavit »

JohnDoeGamer wrote:I like the way it is in the mod. No external views or invisible cockpits! Please keep as is.
agreed i think invisible cockpits would kill it as people who fly jets in 3rd person to see where their tailer is it totaly ruins it because normally pilots have no idea where they are they just gotta get em of thier tail using quick wit not a magical floating camera
~~~You Think That Is Air You Are Breathing Now~~~
Image
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
Posts: 175
Joined: 2006-05-15 18:55

question..

Post by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r »

did they remove the mouse-look..? I use that a lot and it would be **** if it was removed, and not one bit realistic..
others than that I think it's the vBF2 that sucks in this case.. there should never have been "no-cockpit" or 3'rd person views.. that's just to satisfy the 10 year old's and below..
How much easier are bombing-runs when you can line up targets all the way in..?
things like that are what's causing the tremendous "whoring" going on in vBF2, it takes NO skill to master things = kids (that have no feel for team or not base-raping) can dominate the game..
serious players that would never dream of removing the cockpit, for the sake of realism, get disadvantages.. and that sucks, but is evidence of DICE's total lack of respect for the generation that made them, people that bought their original titles (not just BF1942)..

it's like when George Lucas made episode I, II and III total freaking baby versions.. (not that II and III were that bad, but considering his "real" audience is now 25+.. he could have left out Jar-Jar, WTF!!?)
well that was WAY off topic.. he he..
Image
Image
____________________________________________
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r, operating sm0othly since 1977..
Armand61685
Posts: 427
Joined: 2005-05-06 09:14

Post by Armand61685 »

Malik wrote:Just so you know, project REALITY is for BATTLEFIELD 2 and BATTLEFIELD 2 is a GAME and GAMES by definition are for ENTERTAINMENT no matter what their objective is so in this case I think ENTERTAINMENT takes precidence over REALITY because NOBODY likes to LOSE because some fool wanted REALISM over FUN.
Realism = fun

Just ask all of the Opfor, red orchestra, america's army kids.
My PR ingame name is Pvt.Nouri.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”