Give Anti-Tank a rifle?

~WPN~ Magnum_Fire · Post by **~WPN~ Magnum_Fire** » 2006-05-16 23:35

Ive seen a U.S. Soldier walking around with a Javelin Rocket System along with 1 extra missle, while walking around with an M4 just last night on FoxNews, he could have picked it up from someone else but he seemed like he was useing the hell out of it.

trogdor1289 · Post by **trogdor1289** » 2006-05-16 23:46

We've been over this before just because you see a pic of some US guy using a rifle with a Javelin or SMAW or whatever is not a reason to give the US guys an Rifle now a USOP maunal or the like would be a good reason.
Sorry for harsh tone but this "Oh Oh I saw an guy with a SMAW plus a rifle" stuff has to stop.

DMXSNOW · Post by **DMXSNOW** » 2006-05-16 23:49

I saw a guy with a m4, sraw, m95, m16, gernades, smoke gernades, mines, c4, and body armor, and he had a lot of stamina.

We should add that to PR.....

Just be glad what you have everyone. It balances out the game.

trogdor1289 · Post by **trogdor1289** » 2006-05-16 23:56

DMXSNOW wrote:I saw a guy with a m4, sraw, m95, m16, gernades, smoke gernades, mines, c4, and body armor, and he had a lot of stamina.

Are you sure that wasn't rambo?

Deuce6 · Post by **Deuce6** » 2006-05-17 00:01

It was me.

It can be done in real life...but i'd rather not see that in game. It's fine if the AT has a submachine gun. At least it's SOMETHING.

DMXSNOW · Post by **DMXSNOW** » 2006-05-17 02:49

AT class needs a submachine gun since the rockets are worthless against tanks in .03 . I'm sure that will be fixed though.

triumph · Post by **triumph** » 2006-05-17 03:04

When did rockets become worthless? I've taken down plenty, it's just that the tank does some mighty fine damage or i run outta rockets because i suck with wired guided missiles and prefer stupid stuff like RPGs.

If a person with an Eryx ors omething similar gets an assault rifle gun like an m16 or an M4 than he had better not have any stamina to make that close a sitting duck in the open.

the.ultimate.maverick · Post by **the.ultimate.maverick** » 2006-05-17 05:50

Once more....a PDW comes to mind..

Post by **NikovK** » 2006-05-17 08:18

I'd venture to say our little submachine guns fit the bill, but then we're back to square one. We could use the light soldier sets to make the AT soldier more fragile. The weapons are still severely outclassed at range and are almost useless on outdoor maps.

In the hypothetical Light and Heavy AT unlock situation, the SMG, carbine or rifle would go to the light kit and the pistol to the heavy kit.

I'm content with pistols, though.

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2006-05-17 10:05

~WPN~callum247 wrote:Don't tell me this aint a SRAW...

The guy is USMC too

It's a SRAW, yes, but I don't know if that's in Iraq or Afghanistan or one of the various proving grounds in the US. Not sure how many, if any, made it into the field. And yes, that's an M16, but the SRAW was meant to replace the AT-4; it's a single shot disposable weapon.