Alot of our forces overseas like Special Forces have acquired the EO-Tech Sight for Rifles suck as the M16 or M4. Haven't seen a post like this yet so this is what I have gave my 2 cents about.
Last edited by JoyRider on 2009-04-18 02:05, edited 1 time in total.
There is already 3 differnt kinds of sights for the m16 so why would we need another one? if anything the brit rifle needs a new sight hate that dang spike.
PR Test Team: [COLOR="Black"]Serious Business[/COLOR] [R-DEV]dbzao: My head Rhino.... (long pause) My beautiful head [R-DEV]Rhino - If you want to spam do it in the tester area please. Control the Media, Control the Mind.
From what I've seen, PR armies are dealing with regular armed forces (IE not spec. ops) and what they use, or at least what standard issue inventory is. In other words, a vast majority. For example, the M68 sights are more popular in the US Army than the EO-Tech (from what I've seen). So, the m68 sights are used.
Another example would be that the US army has many different pistols that they use, except the M9 pistol is what they mostly use. So that's why its in PR.
PR is also tries to balance everything out. IE Load-out of vehicles. Sure, maybe MEC forces aren't issued incendiary grenades, but to balance things out, they get one as well. So one side doesn't get over-powerful.
EOTech has been suggested before, several times, a simple search for "EOTech" gives several responses pertinent to your suggestion and more in depth searching will no doubt find many more. The odds of EOTech sites replacing the current Aimpoint sites in PR is very low. The US Military does not equip their front line soldiers with the EOTech and since PR endeavors to recreate the battlefield from the perspective of a standard soldier, the change will probably not happen. In any event, please use the Search Function and the Attention! Already Suggested Suggestions List before posting suggestions.