[Concept] More Technicals

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
Xander[nl]
Posts: 2056
Joined: 2007-05-24 13:27

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by Xander[nl] »

Couldn't hurt I guess, but it would have to be very slow and very vulnurable to ground fire or even laser guided air attacks. Shouldn't be much of a gamebreaker for infantry as long as the gun is facing backwards with only 180 degrees of turning radius and has **** elevation.
Image
BMF-cetniksoldier
Posts: 57
Joined: 2008-07-14 05:13

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by BMF-cetniksoldier »

I think everyone should not act like wierd techies have never been built. Improvised weapons are always built in war time so I can see anything being mounted on a pick up truck or any platform.

Image
Image

This was a general electric train modified with AA, anti tank gun, ETC , armor etc. It was called krajina express in balkan conflict. It was built buy Republika Srpska Krajina Paramilitary force. Not convention army.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krajina_express
BMF-cetniksoldier
waldov
Posts: 753
Joined: 2012-06-26 04:01

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by waldov »

stuff being in that when an A-10 comes down on you.
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

wtf, it looks like an M18 Hellcat or M36 Slugger turret fitted on that train.
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
Stealthgato
Posts: 2676
Joined: 2010-10-22 02:42

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by Stealthgato »

The whole vehicle is there, you can see the hull aswell.
SShadowFox
Posts: 1123
Joined: 2012-01-25 21:35

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by SShadowFox »

In WWI they already mounted weapons (including heavy artillery) on trains...
Image
[R-DEV]Spec:The suggestion is not accepted, I merely wanted to comment.

Shame doesn't work on me, Nor on men of my caliber.
BMF-cetniksoldier
Posts: 57
Joined: 2008-07-14 05:13

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by BMF-cetniksoldier »

krajina express was in the 90s. Yes its an M18 hellcat destroyer that was given to the JNA (Yugoslav army) in 70s (maybe sold by us or gift IDK) then obtained by paramilitary . . A10 would not have faired well because the train had AA from MANPADS and also 20mm cannons. During the time the opposing faction had mig 21 stolen from JNA or sold from East germany (not to mention NATO warplanes so A10/ f16 in operation) and the train succesfully operated for almost 4 years. The point is, I think insurgent in PR should get better weapons because they would have improvised much more than just an MG techie.

They should have AA , I also have footage of Paramiltary using AA against infantry in balkans mounted on flatbed trucks.

WHats fair is fair, and ins already are going up against a professional army with million dollar armor, it is only fair that we give ins AA pickups/rocket pod and in addition more scoped weapons. I mean really the insurgents can buy a 20 dollar china scope IRL, they move enough opiates and hash, they work suprsingly well for 4x scope IRL. I mean PR is about reality and gameplay and I think more people would take insurgent much more serious when playing if they had some more firepower. Too many peope just lone wolf because they see no strength in a group of INS because they are just iron sight pedestrians right now.
Last edited by BMF-cetniksoldier on 2012-09-02 10:48, edited 9 times in total.
BMF-cetniksoldier
fabioxxxx
Posts: 180
Joined: 2009-07-02 01:12

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by fabioxxxx »

i think a transport technical is needed ... i never saw pictures of insurgents transporting troops in common vehicles... its always some kind of crappy truck or a pickup... the insurgent ammo car could be edited to fill this role.

it's an pain in the *** transporting a full squad in a piece of **** that can't stand a little heat and can only stay on the road.

Image


Image


Image

i expect that insurgents will get a little love in version 1.0...

insurgents hate crappy cars ! that's why they blow then up with bombs all the time
i would not even carry my chickens in something like this ahaha
Image
Last edited by fabioxxxx on 2012-09-07 17:48, edited 13 times in total.
doop-de-doo
Posts: 827
Joined: 2009-02-27 12:50

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by doop-de-doo »

If the quad was place on the back of a big red and the big red drove poorly (bad acceleration, etc) then might it be viable then?

:evil: B4TM4N :evil:
AnA10Warthog
Posts: 228
Joined: 2012-09-09 15:56

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by AnA10Warthog »

I want a Prius with a .50 on top.
"There's no way it's 3:30, oh wait, that's not my clock, that's my altimeter."-Happy, DCS World
ubermensche
Posts: 264
Joined: 2010-12-09 03:12

Post by ubermensche »

AnA10Warthog wrote:I want a Prius with a .50 on top.
I second this! :D
[F|H]Zackyx
Posts: 297
Joined: 2011-11-18 21:47

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by [F|H]Zackyx »

i think we sould give a zpu-2 techie who can only shoot from the rear with a 20 burst round for each shoot and a reload time of 20 second it would be hard to use it but when you have coordinaton and skilled driver it would be effective but not overpowered
godfather_596
Posts: 359
Joined: 2012-02-11 19:48

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by godfather_596 »

I think an AA techie is a must. Either some pickup or even an Ural and we can have only one not to unbalance the game.
fabioxxxx
Posts: 180
Joined: 2009-07-02 01:12

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by fabioxxxx »

Transport Techie ...since is the vehicle of choice for most insurgents all over the world.

The Cookie Monster also approves it :p


Image

Image
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by X-Alt »

fabioxxxx wrote:Transport Techie ...since is the vehicle of choice for most insurgents all over the world.

The Cookie Monster also approves it :p


Image

Image
Militia tiam!: Image
fabioxxxx
Posts: 180
Joined: 2009-07-02 01:12

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by fabioxxxx »

for attack we got the rocket techie , that's even more than i thought we would get... but insurgents need a decent transport vehicle... the clown car as main transport vehicle is terrible... no insurgent in the world would use it as their main transportation system... when seeing insurgents on the move pickups are always the majority.
LITOralis.nMd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 5658
Joined: 2010-04-10 16:15

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by LITOralis.nMd »

What ever happened to the Zeus mounted on the ammo techie ? There is a thread somewhere in the modding forums, and I saw a picture of what looked like a nearly completed model.

BEHOLD: I remembered the thread:
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f388-p ... ncept.html
Last edited by LITOralis.nMd on 2014-01-15 15:17, edited 1 time in total.
X-Alt
Posts: 1073
Joined: 2013-07-02 22:35

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by X-Alt »

I think we should implement the AA techie to Iraq INS or Taliban ASAP! It really gets annoying having chopper after chopper gun down your Stinger guys..

Hilux + ZPU-2 = Win
BMP-1 Turret+Hilux=Win?
M35 or Ural + ZPU-4 = Win?
User avatar
Mineral
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 8534
Joined: 2012-01-02 12:37
Location: Belgium

Re: [Concept] More Technicals

Post by Mineral »

PR's Technicals are too small to put a AA cannon on the back unfortunately.

Ural truck + new ZU-23-2 is on it's way though ;)
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”