Project Reality Forums

Antol.PL wrote:What and when will be next faction release to PR:BF2?

mosinmatt wrote:I am going to partially agree with Desert Tiger. Opfor, especially INS always seems to get the short end.
At least the collaborator can heal himself now, and the RPGs don't fall to the ground immediately out of the tube.
But the guns...I know the Insurgency are supposed to have crappy guns. But no optics sucks. the bluefor with the ACOG is almost as deadly as a marksman rifle. They can sit out a few hundred meters away and just slay bodies, where as ALL the INS standard kits have nothing. You see one pixel, then you die. It woul dbe nice to at least have the cell leader have a scoped version or something.

Souls Of Mischief wrote:1. Proper use of cover
2. Insurgent weapons are far better in CQB.
3. Insurgents are supposed to use hit and run tactics.
4. If you fail... follow the next points.
5. Get to main and look for SVD's and a Enfield No. 4
6. ???
7. Profit.

mosinmatt wrote:I am going to partially agree with Desert Tiger. Opfor, especially INS always seems to get the short end.
At least the collaborator can heal himself now, and the RPGs don't fall to the ground immediately out of the tube.
But the guns...I know the Insurgency are supposed to have crappy guns. But no optics sucks. the bluefor with the ACOG is almost as deadly as a marksman rifle. They can sit out a few hundred meters away and just slay bodies, where as ALL the INS standard kits have nothing. You see one pixel, then you die. It woul dbe nice to at least have the cell leader have a scoped version or something.

'Sgt.Desert Tiger[TR wrote:;1652526']1.Which cover???Nearly all insurgency maps include open grounds than city so we cant hide in middle of desert.(You can only hide well in Fallujah if you not in left of map)

2.Insurgents weapons better in CQB is NOT true.Because all the time when I find bluefor in CQB he can only need turn his weapon to me not need to take aim.Because bluefors weapons have great accuracy in close combat even not aimming so most of time in CQB you are dying while try to take aim on enemy.

3.I agree with you but with their ultraoverpowered weapons bluefor eaisly beat you before you try to run from that area so this tactics not working most of time.

4. ...

5. SVD and no4 have worst accuracy than bluefors marksman and sniper guns.SVD ok for me.But especially no4 have longer aiming time and from 0.96 you cant hit anything with it.But if you look at bluefors sniper you can aim faster than no4+accuracy double-triple time better than no4+2 zoom.

I am not cry for anything if you think like this.I finish most of my games I am in always first 5 player(about kill) and I used both weapons so I am writing this things with know anything about those weaps.

+I used bluefor sniper rifle in Fallujah as a insurgent 1-2 days ago(We have limitied time for put that kit back to ground you know) and I killed 2-3 americ in 5 min(1 of them nearly in fog because of distance but with 2nd zoom I killed him).

And is this not overpowered I cant tell what it is.

'Sgt.Desert Tiger[TR wrote:;1652632']Same???

Are you kidding with me???

I used several times both weapons.So I know what are they.Pls not talk without try both weaps pls.

'Sgt.Desert Tiger[TR wrote:;1652874']Still you say they are same and you say you used all weaps so you need to use them again.

ShockUnitBlack wrote:I'm pretty sure the majority of insurgent weapons are higher calibre than their BLUFOR counterparts and thus do more damage per shot.

'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz]
There is also, as mentioned, gameplay reasons. The whole idea is that BLUFOR searches for, and assaults/clears, cache positions so that infantry can dispose of them. The challenge for BLUFOR is to move in and have to deal with the multitude of different threats the insurgents pose in close ranges. Being able to destroy caches in a stand-off manner neglects this.