Posted: 2006-10-24 19:22
yeah i like he idea of a med-evac blackhawk like the one on DC.
I don't agree with most of that, except for the fun factor, if you consider it that. Regarding the defib only, no-one is suggesting adding anything more, just suggesting we take it out. Simple.Top _Cat the great wrote:PR is not devloped enough for the defrib to be removed. The engine is also too limited - cant have legs being shot and resulting in impared movement.
PR must never forget how much of its fun is directly linked to many specific BF2 features - which DEV;s i am sure have not.
I would support its removal if the game engined allowed more - it does not and nver will.
That would be excessive and take away the "game" aspect of it. It would turn into Americas Army, which only has 4 minute rounds sometimes.Blackbelt wrote:1) Dead is dead, stay dead until next game.
well in that 30 seconds if you want that he must be stabelised or someting like that dont it?? so you need 2 medics on the job to revive a guy that could be realistic?Eurus wrote:What if a medic needs a more realistic time for reviving someone. About 30 sec, in those 30 sec the "deadly wounded" soldier can't die. After the 30 sec he can fight. If it would be possible to carrie someone, it would be even more realistic. A medic can drag the wounded person into a safe zone. When there is a medical helicopter/apc the medic can put him in there and can continue the fight.
Maybe there can be such a system, the medic won't be replaced and the realism is very good.
Or maybe it be even maked more realistic when a medic only can stablize "deadly wounded" soldiers and heal wounded soldiers. If the soldier want to heal, he has to go into a medevac chopper where he gets heal.