Project Reality Forums

Psyko wrote:if you can do it in real life you should be able to do it in game. its a stupid waste of three tickets but if that 3 tickets costs the enemy an important asset then whatevz.

ComradeHX wrote:IRL you can also run around in only underwear with rifles...etc.
Would you like to do that in PR?

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Is there any server which actually allows BLUFOR c4 cars? I've never seen a server that allows it. Does this thread have a point anymore other than confirming that all real PR players do not condone BLUFOR C4 vehicles? I don't think the sticking part is a bug or glitch, merely a feature left over from Vanilla for the OP.

Psyko wrote:if you can do it in real life you should be able to do it in game. its a stupid waste of three tickets but if that 3 tickets costs the enemy an important asset then whatevz.

you will always hear the whiners first, and the funny thing is the whiners are the ones raising awareness of it's existence and now every noob and his brother that read this thread will be doing it this week. Nice one guys, i dont think you have the right to call anyone else stupid after posting in this thread. haha

Psyko wrote:if you can do it in real life you should be able to do it in game. its a stupid waste of three tickets but if that 3 tickets costs the enemy an important asset then whatevz.

'KillJoy[Fr wrote:;1824191']People are whinning too when a sneaky engineer blow caches with C4

CopyCat wrote:removing the ability to paste it on vehicles will be most likely hard coded

Joker86 wrote:To all those "It's possible, so it's okay, deal with it you pussies!"-tryhard-badasses:

- Games have rules. Actually the rules are what defines a game. All games have some, card games, board games, computer games, sport games.

- The main reason for needing rules is not only to give the game some kind of interesting structure, it's mainly for providing every participant with the same chances/conditions to win. If the game is (too) unfair, it's no longer thrilling, and there is no point in playing it if you are the party with the disadvantage

- Now in a multiplayer game balance is important to have a fair and thrilling gameplay. The developers need to take a lot of things into account to achieve that balance, the process is incredibly complicated

- In PR they need to take care, that the optic sights, armour, air support, superior equipment and all the other stuff of BLUFOR are as effective as the IEDs, civilians, better map locations and so on of the insurgents. This is the "fair" part of the rules. The "interesting structure" of this game is supposed to reenact modern real life fights as good as possible/reasonable.

- Now if you stick C4 to a BLUFOR vehicle (as BLUFOR player, some members here apparently still didn't understand the point of the thread), rush close to the cache and blow it up through a wall, you can assume it's not the way the developers meant it to be.

- First of all, it's against the idea of the game of reenacting real life combat, because I still haven't read any news about a western military vehicle which suicide bombed an insurgent hideout. Would be difficult to find volunteers, anyway.

- Secondly, it destroys the balancing, because you can assume very well that any "possibility", which exists in the game, but is not explicitly a feature, is not intended by the devs. If it's not intended by the devs, but offers a (in this case huge) advantage, it definitely destroys balance.

- Missing balance kills the game. End of reasoning.

By the way, if anything what is possible in the game would be allowed, the word "glitching" wouldn't even exist. Hiding in walls would be okay, or leading your BLUFOR squad into the IED of your insurgent friend to get him some kills, or switching the teams to ghost the stash, because all of it is possible.

So please stop your lame *** argumentation that it should be left in the game, because what it tells about you and your sense of fairness, fun and also style and realism is nothing I'd like to write down here...

Murphy wrote:In this thread as well as the C4 on caches one there is a trend that is emerging. Blind players who cannot distinguish between a cheat (hacking/ghosting) and a sneaky tactic *THE USE OF C4*. Thankfully not everyone is an admin otherwise this community would be in shit.

What next is rushing a first flag considered an exploit/cheat/bannable offense simply because you don't agree with it?

Pvt.LHeureux wrote: About BluFor putting C4 on their vehicles, it's just stupid, why would you waste a million dollars HUMVEE by kamikasing it in enemy hideouts when you could use it's .50 to greater use without losing this valuable asset?

Yellingman wrote:Is it me or a lot of people in this thread are waaaay too retarded to understand the subject??? What a heck are you talking about. We're speaking not about "Sneaky C4" we're talking about SUICIDE HUMWV with tons of C4 on board.

Murphy wrote:This thread screams of player imposed restrictions, and I'm sure many of those who replied to this thread were infact discussion that subject as opposed to a situation that happens once every three - four months. I mean seriously, has the OP seen this happen enough times that he figured "enough is enough I'm going to rally the players behind me and change this"? I doubt it, this tactic is fairly uncommon and many of the other uses of C4 discussed in this thread are actually relevant to the game.

Last time I saw someone on a conventional faction using C4 on a vehicle was a bike on Yamalia used to take down our BTR because the round before Manibou and I had gone like 70+ kills without a loss. Other then that the only time I see this being used is on INS games, so quit acting like this is actually a big enough issue that it requires the attention you are trying to garner. It doesn't.