Page 2 of 2
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 15:43
by ZektorSK
CzechoSlovakian forces used T-34s... would be happy if they would be implemented for rebels
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 16:00
by Tit4Tat
ZektorSK wrote:
CzechoSlovakian forces used T-34s... would be happy if they would be implemented for rebels
Can you elaborate a bit more on why a 1940s era tank should be used in PR and what can it bring to the table?
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 16:05
by Jacksonez__
Tit4Tat wrote:Can you elaborate a bit more on why a 1940s era tank should be used in PR and what can it bring to the table?
I was wondering exactly the same. I have read that T-34 is hard to use. T-55/64/72 are basically idiot proof models and "easy" to operate.
Where do you even find working T-34 in large numbers & shells for them nowaydays?

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 16:13
by ZektorSK
Jacksonez__ wrote:I was wondering exactly the same. I have read that T-34 is hard to use. T-55/64/72 are basically idiot proof models and "easy" to operate.
Where do you even find working T-34 in large numbers & shells for them nowaydays?
Yeah, T-55 would be just good enaught for rebels, cuz they are weak already
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 16:41
by Tit4Tat
ZektorSK wrote:Yeah, T-55 would be just good enaught for rebels, cuz they are weak already
i give up on you Zektor.
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 17:02
by ZektorSK
Tit4Tat wrote:
i give up on you Zektor.
Then you will have to try harder then that
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-05 17:11
by Mats391
Regarding a fictional EU faction, i am not opposed to that. BF2 had one as well

However i do not see them as an OpFor faction. What you describe with FN Fal sounds a bit like Belgium going rogue

A fictional faction based on ex east block states would be better suited for OpFor, but than it quickly turns into Russia clone anyway.
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-06 15:02
by rPoXoTauJIo
Lets just grab models from wargame, and make nswp faction. The problem would be infantry trough, players are hardcoded.

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-06 15:07
by Frontliner
PR:Cold War please. I know you want it too.
Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction
Posted: 2016-04-06 15:13
by Gerfand
Well you can make an GER vs FRA, or a USA vs GBR, or even a Marines vs Army map, and this would be very authentic...
how: military exercises... more like HARDCORE WAR GAMES

!
anyway, in the European front, there a lot of separatists groups, and a generic "European Militia" would work pretty well