Page 2 of 2

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 15:43
by ZektorSK
Image

CzechoSlovakian forces used T-34s... would be happy if they would be implemented for rebels

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 16:00
by Tit4Tat
ZektorSK wrote:Image

CzechoSlovakian forces used T-34s... would be happy if they would be implemented for rebels

Can you elaborate a bit more on why a 1940s era tank should be used in PR and what can it bring to the table?

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 16:05
by Jacksonez__
Tit4Tat wrote:Can you elaborate a bit more on why a 1940s era tank should be used in PR and what can it bring to the table?
I was wondering exactly the same. I have read that T-34 is hard to use. T-55/64/72 are basically idiot proof models and "easy" to operate.

Where do you even find working T-34 in large numbers & shells for them nowaydays? :?

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 16:13
by ZektorSK
Jacksonez__ wrote:I was wondering exactly the same. I have read that T-34 is hard to use. T-55/64/72 are basically idiot proof models and "easy" to operate.

Where do you even find working T-34 in large numbers & shells for them nowaydays? :?
Yeah, T-55 would be just good enaught for rebels, cuz they are weak already

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 16:41
by Tit4Tat
ZektorSK wrote:Yeah, T-55 would be just good enaught for rebels, cuz they are weak already
Image


i give up on you Zektor.

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 17:02
by ZektorSK
Tit4Tat wrote:Image


i give up on you Zektor.
Then you will have to try harder then that

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-05 17:11
by Mats391
Regarding a fictional EU faction, i am not opposed to that. BF2 had one as well :p
However i do not see them as an OpFor faction. What you describe with FN Fal sounds a bit like Belgium going rogue :D A fictional faction based on ex east block states would be better suited for OpFor, but than it quickly turns into Russia clone anyway.

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-06 15:02
by rPoXoTauJIo
Lets just grab models from wargame, and make nswp faction. The problem would be infantry trough, players are hardcoded. :D

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-06 15:07
by Frontliner
PR:Cold War please. I know you want it too.

Re: Russian overrepresentation and the need for another "opfor" faction

Posted: 2016-04-06 15:13
by Gerfand
Well you can make an GER vs FRA, or a USA vs GBR, or even a Marines vs Army map, and this would be very authentic...

how: military exercises... more like HARDCORE WAR GAMES :twisted: :twisted: !


anyway, in the European front, there a lot of separatists groups, and a generic "European Militia" would work pretty well