Project Reality Forums

k i have downloaded the 3ds max9 trail , and i have to say this isnt hard as i thought , right now i am playing with it and i have to say after watching the tutorial vids i can prolly finish this project less then a year , including a secret project hehehe

I dont know if this will come as incouragement or not but it is meant to be. When i first started modeling i learned a few basics, but then jumped right in. This was one of my first models:






So if you want to make one you can, it will be hard and time consuming. The hardest part will probably be the UVs

thats pretty cool , how come you never finished it ?

jarleif wrote: So if you want to make one you can, it will be hard and time consuming. The hardest part will probably be the UVs

break it up it more part's like a front part jsut what DICE did then the UV will be a lot easyer to handel

yes, eventually it will be broken up, but non detail layers, i want to do it in larger sections, then break it up even more. The reason i havent finished it is because i have too many more important things to get done.....like USI

Very good

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:

Dayamn, that thing is armed to the teeth.

not to mention all the aircraft it can dispatch

Most military vessels are armed to the teeth. This is gonna be a long shot, but after you're done (lol), you might want to consider the Admiral Kuznetsov for the Russians, which is also the same thing as the Ukrainian Varyag for the Chinese. Then you can have carrier to carrier engagements on 17km^2 maps.

'[R-MOD wrote:Griffon2-6']Most military vessels are armed to the teeth. This is gonna be a long shot, but after you're done (lol), you might want to consider the Admiral Kuznetsov for the Russians, which is also the same thing as the Ukrainian Varyag for the Chinese. Then you can have carrier to carrier engagements on 17km^2 maps.

Coral Sea was such a great map...

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians)

great work btw and so or so a Kuznetsov would really also be awsome

yea some thiung like this name

atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007

Cerberus wrote:Coral Sea was such a great map...

Coral Sea?

'[R-MOD wrote:Griffon2-6']Coral Sea?

bf1942 map, carrier vs carrier air battle map.

Maxfragg wrote:would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China (since the US will not fight against the Russians)

You mean because in the PR setup the Russians and the US is the same team (Team 1) whereas the Chinese, MEC, etc are on the other team?

Or do you mean scenario wise? Who knows what can happen in the future and it does not matter in terms of gameplay. Just the other week Putin send a fleet of bombers toward UK airspace as a threat to NATO's policies.

i meant team wise

yea some thiung like this name

atack_on_paerl_harbor_2007

2 years ago in US a person got sued over saying that. Bt on the map ill say yes!

annd also why cant we use the carrier from SF? its the same thing he is going to build!

would be really funny to have a carrier vs carrier map with US vs China

Good luck trying that one. China only has one Russian made carrier in their navy and it is in pretty bad shape. Probably doesn't even have an engine. Would be a very bad battle for China in that map. Might sink as soon as the game starts.

the "thing from SF" is the same landing craft that is already in Battlefield 2 just with rooms inside and it isn't even half of the sice of a nimitz class aircraft carrier, those landingcrafts can only launch vertical take of jets like the harrier and helicopters, in real live a F/A-18 can not start from this baby carrier