Mini gun for little bird!

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
Posts: 175
Joined: 2006-05-15 18:55

Post by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r »

Solitas wrote:If their anything like the BH's guns I'll be happy, from little knowledge I have the AH-6 is used in a minor offensive roles sometimes anyway.

Besides that does it bother anyone else that whenever the pilot twirls or turns sharply none of the soldiers sitting on the side DON'T fall off?
not sure.. but it would be damed stupid not to be strapped in if you're sitting on the outside of a helicopter.. that's MOST likely what keeps people from falling off..
Image
Image
____________________________________________
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r, operating sm0othly since 1977..
Malik
Posts: 1676
Joined: 2006-04-20 16:49

Post by Malik »

Still, you can do insane barrel rolls then plough into the floor without the passengers even flinching. :D
the.ultimate.maverick
Posts: 1229
Joined: 2006-02-19 23:49

Post by the.ultimate.maverick »

5m0oth_0p3r4t0r wrote:not sure.. but it would be damed stupid not to be strapped in if you're sitting on the outside of a helicopter.. that's MOST likely what keeps people from falling off..
How does that explain it when a pilot is near the ground, when safety straps would have been disengaged, pulls a violent maneouver - this would throw the soldier flying wouldn't it?
Image
Solitas
Posts: 354
Joined: 2006-04-14 20:55

Post by Solitas »

Blimey I'm starting to wish I never made the bloody joke
Learn to laugh at yourself, before you laugh at the people around you
Wraith
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1929
Joined: 2006-02-11 00:10

Post by Wraith »

lol, I been there there maverick. I flew out the damn door and landed in the water thank god.
Image
Image
Armand61685
Posts: 427
Joined: 2005-05-06 09:14

Post by Armand61685 »

Top _Cat the great wrote:Yuo can not have a littlebird that can both carry passengers and have mini guns! SO really the present mini bird is all transport and i like it that way.

It is more of a flying humvee, not a troop carrier due to ability to only carry 6 (can never be cahnged to 7, unlike Black hawk).
Why not? If the marines have it in real life, why not in PROJECT REALITY...sheesh
My PR ingame name is Pvt.Nouri.
perectshot69
Posts: 27
Joined: 2006-05-14 23:52

Post by perectshot69 »

this thread was about mini guns they are already planing tto put them on dont post anymore
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

Unless an admin determines that this thread is turning into a spam thread and closes it people can keep posting.
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

lol,
Armand61685 -you might be right, it is jsut i have never seen a troop carrying littlebird with miniguns. It is just a mistake on my part.

Ijsut thought they where always kept seperate, miniguns and troop transporting.
O well, personally i am happy with 2 different types, not some verison imbetween.
Pence
Posts: 2248
Joined: 2006-02-04 06:10

Post by Pence »

Top _Cat the great wrote:lol,
Armand61685 -you might be right, it is jsut i have never seen a troop carrying littlebird with miniguns. It is just a mistake on my part.
Your the one who is right, the Littlebird comes with either seating benches or miniguns and rockets.
"I am not bald, i shave my head"
Image
"How could you falter when you're the rock of Gibraltar"
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

Pence wrote:Your the one who is right, the Littlebird comes with either seating benches or miniguns and rockets.
correct. Its only EA who think it dose....

which may i add, is going to confuse people for the rest of there lives.
Image
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

i htought, but did nto want to hurt his feelings, hope he does not read this. But really i could not be bothered to put up a decent argument.
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
Posts: 175
Joined: 2006-05-15 18:55

Post by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r »

personally, I would sooo like to see the “upwardly mobile” forces taken down a notch.. I mean armament wise.. attack helis and planes are a pain in “we all know where” when you’re on foot.. I’d much rather see more transport/supply duties being carried out from the air and less “Gunshipping” ..

ok, the “gunshipping” is realistic, but it would be more fun if helicopters were to move troops and equipment around more and destroy less..
might not be the most popular opinion, but that just goes to show it’s MY opinion..
Image
Image
____________________________________________
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r, operating sm0othly since 1977..
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

dont worrie we aint going to chuck in 5 LB gunships and 1 LB transport :p
Image
mavit
Posts: 248
Joined: 2006-04-06 17:32

Post by mavit »

ok im confused.......so you cant get a lb with miniguns and rockets and benches???? lol that would be funny have them all and the guys on benches are straddling a flaming minigun
~~~You Think That Is Air You Are Breathing Now~~~
Image
LeftSkidLow
Posts: 46
Joined: 2006-05-17 00:31

Post by LeftSkidLow »

5m0oth_0p3r4t0r wrote:personally, I would sooo like to see the “upwardly mobile” forces taken down a notch.. I mean armament wise.. attack helis and planes are a pain in “we all know where” when you’re on foot.. I’d much rather see more transport/supply duties being carried out from the air and less “Gunshipping” ..

ok, the “gunshipping” is realistic, but it would be more fun if helicopters were to move troops and equipment around more and destroy less..
might not be the most popular opinion, but that just goes to show it’s MY opinion..
I think you will find there will be less whoring from the air, less plane campers, and more teamwork if this was done. Personally, I also enjoy transporting/scouting more than attacking with a gunship.

Don't put a minigun on it, you will get noobs flying it just for points.
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r
Posts: 175
Joined: 2006-05-15 18:55

word..!

Post by 5m0oth_0p3r4t0r »

LeftSkidLow wrote:I think you will find there will be less whoring from the air, less plane campers, and more teamwork if this was done. Personally, I also enjoy transporting/scouting more than attacking with a gunship.

Don't put a minigun on it, you will get noobs flying it just for points.
like the title said, word..
ok, I'm fronting an input that is on my side.. but, what the heck.. I agree with all he said..
'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino']dont worrie we aint going to chuck in 5 LB gunships and 1 LB transport :p
word, again..
Image
Image
____________________________________________
5m0oth_0p3r4t0r, operating sm0othly since 1977..
NikovK
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1616
Joined: 2005-10-28 09:56

Post by NikovK »

I think the Blackhawk should have one minigun removed. That gives it four dedicated carry points instead of being half gun platform, half jeep.
Mapper of Road to Kyongan'Ni and Hills of Hamgyong;
Genius behind many Really Stupid Ideas, and some Decent Ones.

Image
perectshot69
Posts: 27
Joined: 2006-05-14 23:52

Post by perectshot69 »

PLEASE NO MORE POSTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i got the fact i wanted to get acros the ah 6 little bird is contraersial ok it it fine now NO POSTS
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”