the new T90

[iwillkillyouhun]

T90 are just doing fine.

and us tanks no need to upgrade the armor just get out from there quickly

[ytman]

Legend you have been pm'd due to your shenanigans I figured it didn't belong here.

[***LeGeNDK1LLER***]

Legend you have been pm'd due to your shenanigans I figured it didn't belong here.

truth but i really dont have interest to start a war with an american concerning who's better
f16 or mig 29,bradley or bmp3,t-90 or abrams...

is something that disgusting(dont get me wrong is nothing to do with you..) me cuz i've saw thousands of self-made wannabe pentagon advisors flamming about these arguments.i will send you some PM of credible sources(for me sure...)which will prove what i've said.

[Truism]

Of course the Abrahms has FCS at least a generation ahead of the T90, and doesn't rely on ERA. Neither of these things are modelled in game.

QQ much?

[Trooper909]

The main message of this thread looks like "ai-ai-ai, i must kill everything with my abrams, not this pesky russians, ne-ne-ne, they cant have better weapons, than us, blablalba, lets use equals assets everywhere, bububu etc"
If You cant kill t-90 in duel, use apc or second tank support, ask some hat to travel with you (use hmmw or give him a ride, if you are in bradley) etc. Different level of experience, tactic and teamwork.
I can say that chinook is overpowered as it carries 2 crates, bradley is overpowered because it shoots 2 atgms in short time etc etc, but i will not do this )

As for t-62, a agree. Something is wrong with its armor. On Kozelsk my squad-mate hits it 3 times with t-90 but t-62 killed t-90 and drives away.

This. Also what the banned guy on the same page said.

[Bigglestheman]

*

is the same old history.there are a lot of self-made wannabe expert brainwashed pro-western
side which they think basically that everything is made by americans is more effective than russian stuffs.how they know that?well probably because they have seen some facious documentaries on history channel or something like that....

There are just as much Russian's who think just the same as you say brainwashed pro-western American's do. I am sure nationalism is probably the main reason why they think U.S. stuff is better than Russian stuff vice versa. It's nice to think that you have the best stuff better for morale. One question does Russia have cool US army shades ?

[Hitman.2.5]

Just, WTF !? that thing blow up an Abrams with a single AT missile, its like WTF !!! That need to be change seriously, or add up armor to M1A2 to make it balanced. IRL Abrams can sustain alot of thing, and i'm pretty sure that a 1 foot thick armor in the front will sustain a ATBLM hit.

the main barrel of a t-90 is what 125mm? the missile fits inside that, it has a tandem warhead too so if that hits anything its going to suffer if it doesn't destroy it will certainly run away if it hasn't been immobilized. think of it as a big dog going to bite some one you smack it on the nose its tail will go between its legs and it will back off

[dunem666]

ATGM FTW

[unrealalex]

Check that video out. THREE T-90's dead vs one Leopard!

But yeah if you are careful with your tank, especially on Silent Eagle, the T-90's aren't a problem at-all. You can get a shot off without the T-90 knowing where he was shot from before him dying. Though the same could be said in reverse. I've killed an Abram with 1 shot with the T-90 Anti-tank missile while the Abrams was on the move on his ***. If he had seen where he was going without stepping onto open ground, I might not have seen him.

That videos proves nothing considering the T-90 players missed most of their shots. You just got lucky with bad players.

Tank vs Tank warfare used to be balanced, now it's retarded and unenjoyable.

[Dev1200]

I'd say, either higher reload time, or limited ammo capacity. TOW missiles are anti tank, so I don't agree with reducing damage.


remember that the US has SRAW, but russians only have tandems

[dtacs]

have tandems

Best HAT in the game, puts a Bradley on fire and kills anything stryker-like

[Ford_Jam]

Best HAT in the game, puts a Bradley on fire and kills anything stryker-like

So the Merkava thing doesn't matter any more?

[dtacs]

So the Merkava thing doesn't matter any more?

That was BS and made me angry.

But the Merkava doesn't last long on Beirut anyway.

[FunkDoctorSpot]

That was BS and made me angry.

But the Merkava doesn't last long on Beirut anyway.

I played rounds where i was in the merkava for several hours
And that on a full server
It just depends on your team and the ability of the TOW-BRDMs

[Nebsif]

Lawls.. I advice some people here to watch a great (also a bit funny) american movie called The Pentagon Wars.
YouTube - The Pentagon Wars - Part 1 Skip to 2:30 if ur interested...
Its about the Bradley, which isnt a tank, its an Infantry Fighting Vehicle.

[AriX17]

Abaut what Abrams modification is this topic ?If it's about M1a1,than yeap,AT-11 can penetrate front it's armour.But M1A2 front armor can save from AT-11.

[Brainlaag]

This whole debate about "Russian tanks being better than American" and vice versa is pretty inefficacious. I like all tanks. They are all badass and overpowered (IRL). If you take all modern tanks (Chally, Leo, Abrams, T-90,..) and you deploy them against each other, the crews experience and tactics are way more important, rather than little details, like 2mm difference in armor.

Edit: Sorry for going off topic