Project Reality Forums

Deathangel_321boom wrote:I wouldn't allow it either, firing from the hip shouldn't be that accurate anyway. Why do you think sights are there! Extreme CQC I know well enough where it is. If you take time and with practice you get to know where it is for slightly longer shots. And theres always tracers on ARs for adjustment...

If Special forces kits were around it'd be cool for them alone to have crosshairs unzoomed, they're trained to fire quickly from the shoulder. But you could argue thats the players responsibility to be elite

Except in game unscoped is from the shoulder, at the moment.

Alex6714 wrote:Except in game unscoped is from the shoulder, at the moment.

Erm yeah thats what I meant, SF could have had crosshairs of the sort that indicate the bullet spread area (like AA3 or something) to simulate experience/training in firing without having checked the sights... (I wasnt getting confused with this 'from the hip' if thats what you were implying?)
Or do you mean something else.

gazzthompson: nice, can hit a barn door


EDIT:and yeah this thread seems half redundant already but that doesn't really help burton you havnt even said what is sh1te.

Can I have the 10 minutes of my life back that I lost because I read all of this thread?

If only mods would moderate and delete the vast majority of sh!te that clogs up PRs forums daily...

Do you really need a Dot on your screen? With a Auto Rifleman, spray and pray, but you can get a proper center on fire by seeing where your shots land, Besides, it's created to be deployed to own

Thread closed, and seeing the pretty piss poor attitude of people answering I'm giving out infraction points for each case.

Yes this tactic is a bit cheap but getting so riled up about it is even worse. Rather then try to enlighten someone about the error of his ways, you each preferred to just insult him just to feel good about yourself.
At least he had the courage to put himself in doubt.

OP you are also getting an infraction as you've been on these forums long enough to know what kind of reaction this was going to bring (this isn't the 1st thread about such an action going down flame lane) and should at least presented it in a more suitable way which could have opened the debate on this in a more positive tone, like CAS and Alex6714 did.

Thread locked.