What foreign vehicle...

TheDarkOverlord · Post by **TheDarkOverlord** » 2006-10-17 01:11

There is already a thread on what US vehicles you would like to see, but the MEC/PLA need new stuff alot more than the US does.

So, what foreign vehicle would you most like to see?

I'd like to see:
TOS-1: 220mm heavy rocket flamethrower, with a range of 400-3500m
Mi-24
Zsu-23-4
non-russian MEC vehicles, such as the Mirage F1 and OT-64
Type 62: Light Tank

Resjah · Post by **Resjah** » 2006-10-17 01:27

MEC:
Ka-50 BlackShark
Su-27 Flanker

PLA:
Su-33 (could also be for MEC)
Z-9W Attack copter

Crawley · Post by **Crawley** » 2006-10-17 01:50

MEC:
Ka-50 BlackShark

No Doubt!

Griffon2-6 · Post by **Griffon2-6** » 2006-10-17 02:07

PLA:
J-XX Air superiority fighter

TheCaptn · Post by **TheCaptn** » 2006-10-17 07:29

For MEC, a BN-2 Islander/Defender.

Their transport chopper is next to worthless (huge, slow, lumbering and effectively unarmed) and instead of simply switching it with a better chopper, I thought it might be nice to change that gameplay mechanic even more by replacing it with a light transport aircraft.

The BN-2 is actually smaller than an SU-34 and you could take a little liberty by reducing the wingspan even further (making it more tacticLOL) so it can land more easily in tight spaces.
Speed would be slower than a jet, say around 600, but it would get there faster which means a shorter take-off distance. It would be unarmed, and have a flare fire rate similar to that of a helicopter.

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » 2006-10-17 09:00

M-60 tanks for MEC and/or Insurgents (if and when we get them)

Ural Tansport trucks for resupply

SU-25T for ground attack/CAS

dunkellic · Post by **dunkellic** » 2006-10-17 12:59

m60 tanks for mec? why? stick with the t-90 or t80(U) and perhaps add stora and arena on it ;

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2006-10-17 14:30

change the t90 fot t80 o t76 , and give the t90 or t95 for russians [?]

dunkellic · Post by **dunkellic** » 2006-10-17 14:38

no russians in the game - but having the t-90 could be no problem in reality, since
a) india for example got some of them
b) russia sells its weapons to anyone and anything - as long as they pay

Thunder · Post by **Thunder** » 2006-10-17 15:05

the french LeClec Tank.
and those armored cars france use aswell.
throw in some boats or ampihious transport dont know what ones yeat.

russia cant afford t90's black sharks or AK101's so at the moment they using the export profits to save up to buy some of they own.
but the bulk of russia's armor is still the T72

dunkellic · Post by **dunkellic** » 2006-10-17 17:05

afaik they can afford ak101 (remember, russia has gotten pretty rich through natural ressources) and the use the t-90 in limited numbers (and sell it to foreigerns, for example, inida), also russia is not mec and black shark is a helicopter not a tank

Thunder · Post by **Thunder** » 2006-10-17 17:19

its a flying tank

V3N0N_br · Post by **V3N0N_br** » 2006-10-17 20:32

everything in Dylan's post

The BN-2 Islander/Defender would be nice, but only spec ops would be able to use it right? I mean, it's not that likely someone would land a transport plane on enemy territorry to place troops

Well, I believe vehicle variety makes a big difference on the game... although nowadays multi-purpose warfare is more developed, I like the FH style where there are many different vehicles and each one can be used in a different way - and some make more difference when they're lost than the others.

And course, I'd like to see a BMP-2 also

(and a m2a2 bradley for USMC)

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » 2006-10-18 05:11

Yeah, I forgot about APCs. Those would be a great addition IMO V3NON.

Top_Cat_AxJnAt · Post by **Top_Cat_AxJnAt** » 2006-10-18 05:32

Damn right V3N0N_br, got to have a BMP-2. WOuld be interesting becuase the vehcile has shite armour but beefy weapons capable to taking on MBT's, new L-AT would/could make mince meat of one very easily!
And if any of you dont already think the 50cal on the jeeps is too powerfull on certain infantry only maps - there is a very high chance our present jeeps coudl imbolise and possible destroy a BMP IF they fired at rear (such, weak spots)!

Thunder · Post by **Thunder** » 2006-10-18 10:42

the USMC doesnt use bradleys Venon

dunkellic · Post by **dunkellic** » 2006-10-18 12:22

BMP3 instead of bmp 2 please, and make that btr-80 realistic

PlayPR! · Post by **PlayPR!** » 2006-10-18 14:02

'[5NFSO wrote:Thunder']the USMC doesnt use bradleys Venon

Yes but there switching the USMC into the US Army sooner or later in the game. Or they said, a combination effort where it is just considered every branch of the US military.

V3N0N_br · Post by **V3N0N_br** » 2006-10-21 14:00

'[5NFSO wrote:Thunder']the USMC doesnt use bradleys Venon

Oh, i didn't know that

But it it would be some hell of a fun, it's a beautifull armored vehicle...
The stryker would also be a sweet adition, is it used by USMC?

Skullening.Chris · Post by **Skullening.Chris** » 2006-10-21 14:05

BTR-80 plz.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTR-80
But only if we could ride on the outside :B