no lods graphical option

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
misteroldpea
Posts: 3
Joined: 2017-05-29 18:18

no lods graphical option

Post by misteroldpea »

so does the game look better or worse with this option ticked? sorry i am not very computer literate, but i just wanted the get the best out of the game graphically, but havent seen this option before. been playing since battlefield 1942 came out so not completely new to the whole thing.

"cheers"
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Rabbit »

Its more about what plays better for you, no lods for me keeps my fps up around 90.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
FFG
Forum Moderator
Posts: 1468
Joined: 2014-03-18 04:47

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by FFG »

misteroldpea wrote:-snip-
From what I was told, Having the box ticket should help stop CTD's when diving in CAS jets because the LODs for statics on the maps wouldn't constantly be changing as you dive and fly around. But yee
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Outlawz7 »

Yes it does make it look better because you're always seeing all statics at their highest detail.

RIP if your graphics card/vRAM aren't good enough though.
Image
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Rabbit »

[R-DEV]Outlawz7 wrote:Yes it does make it look better because you're always seeing all statics at their highest detail.

RIP if your graphics card/vRAM aren't good enough though.
6 gigs is great for me, not sure about 4 unless someone else can confirm its fine.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
solidfire93
Posts: 491
Joined: 2015-06-26 14:21

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by solidfire93 »

Rabbit wrote:6 gigs is great for me, not sure about 4 unless someone else can confirm its fine.
hang on, so you're saying that your GPU vRAM should be like about 4gb or higher and then i should turn on the No Lods option !?

im kind of confused here cause when the No Lods option came out and turn it on, i never felt like i had any fps drop..... !

and my GPU VRam is only 2gb !?
rPoXoTauJIo
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 1979
Joined: 2011-07-20 10:02

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by rPoXoTauJIo »

It's feature were made switchable on clientside for a reason.
Go and test, if it's better for you - then it's better for you.
Image

assetruler69: I've seen things you smurfs wouldn't believe. Apaches on the Kashan. I watched burned down tank hulls after the launch of the single TOW. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

Time to give up and respawn.
misteroldpea
Posts: 3
Joined: 2017-05-29 18:18

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by misteroldpea »

[R-DEV]Outlawz7 wrote:Yes it does make it look better because you're always seeing all statics at their highest detail.

RIP if your graphics card/vRAM aren't good enough though.
nah i'll be fine, i've got a gtx 960 2gb, gone are the days when i couldn't play any games apart from bf42 because of my geforce4mx 440 with mighty 64mb, ahh those were the days :d uh:
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Rabbit »

solidfire93 wrote:hang on, so you're saying that your GPU vRAM should be like about 4gb or higher and then i should turn on the No Lods option !?

im kind of confused here cause when the No Lods option came out and turn it on, i never felt like i had any fps drop..... !

and my GPU VRam is only 2gb !?
No, just guessing I wouldn't trust less than 4 gigs, but if you are saying 2 works than thats great.
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
misteroldpea
Posts: 3
Joined: 2017-05-29 18:18

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by misteroldpea »

Wow, thank you for the replies guys (and gals), wasn't expecting people to be so friendly and explaining things in laymen terms. For some reason I assumed the forum would be full of elitist, condescending types. :o ops:

The PR community rocks!
Softy
Posts: 67
Joined: 2009-11-14 00:03

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Softy »

What is this lod setting? Where is it located ?
You have to ask yourself " is the juice worth the squeeze" ?
Rabbit
Posts: 7818
Joined: 2006-12-17 15:14

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Rabbit »

Softy wrote:What is this lod setting? Where is it located ?
Image
Image

AfSoccer "I just don't see the natural talent."
Image
Softy
Posts: 67
Joined: 2009-11-14 00:03

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Softy »

And what does it do?
You have to ask yourself " is the juice worth the squeeze" ?
FFG
Forum Moderator
Posts: 1468
Joined: 2014-03-18 04:47

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by FFG »

Softy wrote:And what does it do?
As far as I know it makes all statics on maps at all distances load the same Level of Detail. usually when you get further away from a building it changes quality levels, with this setting on it doesn't change.
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Rhino »

Correct FFG.

The theory is that some modern GFX cards can more easily process the higher detailed objects, than their CPUs etc can manage switching of all the LODs and textures etc.

This may be true for some people's computers, but probably not all, and in some cases, even some of the best PCs out there migth not be able to manage it, and once my Frigate is out, you really do not want to be drawing it at its highest detail, which is pretty heavy, all the way out to 3kms away, with everything else as well.

Also worth noting the larger the map's view distance, the more importance LODs play, especially when they are well optimised for long view distances.
Image
PeppeJ
Posts: 195
Joined: 2010-11-06 10:32

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by PeppeJ »

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:Correct FFG.

The theory is that some modern GFX cards can more easily process the higher detailed objects, than their CPUs etc can manage switching of all the LODs and textures etc.

This may be true for some people's computers, but probably not all, and in some cases, even some of the best PCs out there migth not be able to manage it, and once my Frigate is out, you really do not want to be drawing it at its highest detail, which is pretty heavy, all the way out to 3kms away, with everything else as well.

Also worth noting the larger the map's view distance, the more importance LODs play, especially when they are well optimised for long view distances.
What's the tris count on the frigate?
Image
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Rhino »

PeppeJ wrote:What's the tris count on the frigate?
Around 55k tris, not including the RHIBs or the Lynx, missiles etc, if you include them then its more like 80k tris.

To put that into context, a MBT is around 10k tris, so its like 5 to 8 tanks rolling around together :p
Image
User avatar
Mats391
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 7643
Joined: 2010-08-06 18:06

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by Mats391 »

Frigate confirmed to be just a static. Sorry guys.
Image

Mineral: TIL that Wire-guided missiles actually use wire
HOLLYWOODY
Posts: 88
Joined: 2017-07-04 17:18

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by HOLLYWOODY »

[ ] No Lods = varying levels of detail
[x] No Lods = max level of detail
Last edited by HOLLYWOODY on 2018-04-06 07:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WeeGeez
Posts: 842
Joined: 2007-10-08 21:30

Re: no lods graphical option

Post by WeeGeez »

Old thread, but does LODS option as it stands currently affect texture detail or object detail or both?
Image
Cheap computer build / fast track upgrade for slow computer for PR > Guide
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”