An idea for the crewman kit
-
Superior Mind
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 2007-02-15 01:55
An idea for the crewman kit
I think that the crewman kit should carry an SMG not an assault rifle. I think it would be more realistic, as crewmen are intended to squeeze into vehicle cockpits. What do you think?
-
ArmedDrunk&Angry
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10
-
Superior Mind
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 2007-02-15 01:55
Oh I know what that gun is, I don't know if that would be the best choice for the UK, because I read up that the SA80 carbine variant is rarely used in the British armed forces.ArmedDrunk&Angry wrote:I think that is on the list for new weapons being developed.
I'm pretty sure they were talking about a "shorty" SA80 as well.
-
Gyberg
- Posts: 709
- Joined: 2006-08-04 23:36
agree! anything to make drivers value their vehicle more instead of driving the apc straight into the cap zone.
Anthony Lloyd, himself a former soldier in the British army and a Northern Ireland and Gulf War veteran:
"The men inside (the APC) might have been UN but they were playing by a completely different set of rules. They were Swedes; in terms of individual intelligence, integrity and single-mindedness I was to find them among the most impressive soldiers I had ever encountered. In Vares their moment had come."
-
$kelet0r
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04
somewhat agree
The British will probably eventually get the L22 or the HK53, the US the M4, the PLA the current spec ops weapon the QBZ97 carbine and so on.
The MEC use the 7.62mm calibre which poses a problem (they shouldn't have the Hk53 at all - it's 5.56 NATO) so a G3KA4 (error? really stubby G3) probably needs to be modelled
The British will probably eventually get the L22 or the HK53, the US the M4, the PLA the current spec ops weapon the QBZ97 carbine and so on.
The MEC use the 7.62mm calibre which poses a problem (they shouldn't have the Hk53 at all - it's 5.56 NATO) so a G3KA4 (error? really stubby G3) probably needs to be modelled
-
Gyberg
- Posts: 709
- Joined: 2006-08-04 23:36
YEAH! lol!
Anthony Lloyd, himself a former soldier in the British army and a Northern Ireland and Gulf War veteran:
"The men inside (the APC) might have been UN but they were playing by a completely different set of rules. They were Swedes; in terms of individual intelligence, integrity and single-mindedness I was to find them among the most impressive soldiers I had ever encountered. In Vares their moment had come."
-
Bob_Marley
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39
Never fear! Bob is here!$kelet0r wrote:where's Bob when I need someone to back me up!
Although I might have to throw something at him if he mentions the P90![]()
Right, the US military issue their tank crews with the M4 carbine, because these days everyone in the US military gets the M4. Their tank crews never had MP5s, before they had M4s they had the M3 (Yes, grease guns.) and M9.
The British army issues the standard L85A2 to its tank crews. They were going to issue them L22s (aka SA80A2K), but this decision was changed and the L22 is now issued to apache crews.
The PLA I've no idea about, but I *believe* PLA tank crews used to be issued with the Type-85 so one would assume that when they switched from the 7.62x25mm to the 5.8x21mm they would have switched from the Type-85 to the Type-05. I'd say that PLA tank crews should either have the Type-05 or the Type-95 carbine.
The MEC pose a problem. 7.62x51mm + short barrel = lunacy. Arming them with the G3KA4 carbine or MC-51 ultrashort carbine makes little sense as I very much doubt that they are easy to use weapons that don’t require a great deal of training to use effectively. This makes them unsuitable for the PDW role.
Which brings us nicely to the P90. The weapon is used in the region (unlike the G3KA4 and MC-51) and is highly suitable for the PDW role, and as such would be an excellent choice for arming MEC tank crews with!
Last edited by Bob_Marley on 2007-03-03 20:41, edited 1 time in total.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
Your suggestion will be ignored for spelling errors and for ending it with a preposition.Bob_Marley wrote:Which brings us nicely to the P90.The weapon is used in the region (unlike the G3KA4 and MC-51) and is highly suitable for the PDW role, and as such would be an exelent choice for arming MEC tank crews with!
-
Bob_Marley
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39
Ah well, cant have everything. At least I got an Ingram variant into the mod!
Oh yeah, I fixed the spelling. But I stand by my preposition, damn it!
Also, sorry lads... it looks like there won't be any M4s, L85/L22s, Type-05/Type-95s or P90s for tank crews because I couldn't spell.
Oh yeah, I fixed the spelling. But I stand by my preposition, damn it!
Also, sorry lads... it looks like there won't be any M4s, L85/L22s, Type-05/Type-95s or P90s for tank crews because I couldn't spell.
Last edited by Bob_Marley on 2007-03-03 20:52, edited 1 time in total.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
-
Bob_Marley
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39
US army helicopter crews were issued MP5KA4s on a trial basis during Operation Gothic Serpent. Following less than satisfactory results it was decided not to acquire any more and instead seek a 5.56mm weapon for use by helicopter crews. They are (like everyone else in the US army) issued with the M4 carbine.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
-
Spaz
- Posts: 3957
- Joined: 2006-06-01 15:57
okey, but how can you get a M4 in a LBBob_Marley wrote:US army helicopter crews were issued MP5KA4s on a trial basis during Operation Gothic Serpent. Following less than satisfactory results it was decided not to acquire any more and instead seek a 5.56mm weapon for use by helicopter crews. They are (like everyone else in the US army) issued with the M4 carbine.
But will there be M4 for all the kits in 0.6? Would love that

-
Sneak Attack
- Posts: 574
- Joined: 2006-12-31 00:14
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
It's only 30 inches long with the stock collapsed. Not that difficult.killallhomies wrote:okey, but how can you get a M4 in a LB![]()
But will there be M4 for all the kits in 0.6? Would love that![]()
On some maps.
BTW, Bob, you'd have to ask Strima about the L22 and armor crews. I believe he once said that they do plan to eventually issue them.
Here it is:
strima wrote:The carbine is being issued to vehicle crewmen. Most tankies have either the L85A2 or the Browning 9mm as ditch weapons. The carbine allows for easier movement in the vehicle especially with the 20 round mag and more firepower than 9mm.
My boys should be issued the carbine next year sometime, it will make life a little easier. The L85 is still easier to stow than the old SLR....![]()
Last edited by Eddie Baker on 2007-03-03 21:24, edited 1 time in total.


