Ok so today on Helmand (love that map, heavy AT-Kit ftw let those buildings blow!)
I was in the LARO jeep gunning in F2 position and I think it's harder to know where i'm placing my hits, harder than the .50 cal imo.
Have you guys encountered the same problem, is it just the map or should there be more tracers?
discuss
GPMG harder to aim?
-
squishy..nl
- Posts: 35
- Joined: 2007-05-05 19:21
GPMG harder to aim?
I shall call him squishy, and he shall me mine, and he shall be my squishy
-
DirtyHarry88
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 2006-12-24 18:41
-
$kelet0r
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04
I find the exact opposite - the mgs are next to useless at any task
I was emptying entire mags at insurgents who were without any fear of my fire charging me. Between aiming it and compensating for the vehicle sliding while you fire you're better off on foot at least until the 50 cal is mounted on them in 0.6
I was emptying entire mags at insurgents who were without any fear of my fire charging me. Between aiming it and compensating for the vehicle sliding while you fire you're better off on foot at least until the 50 cal is mounted on them in 0.6
-
DirtyHarry88
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 2006-12-24 18:41
-
Lucid Nightmare
- Posts: 538
- Joined: 2006-06-24 09:33
-
trogdor1289
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04
-
Expendable Grunt
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54



