Issue of Class Optics

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
robbo
Posts: 1159
Joined: 2006-10-25 15:14

Issue of Class Optics

Post by robbo »

Ok well, i feel this needs to be addressed right now the only class with a Assault rifle and Optics is the Rifleman and the Officer were as IRL (Based on British Military) almost every soldier has Optics on his gun.

So my suggestion is this:

* Medic: kept how it is i can see the point of the Medic having optics
* Engy: Same as medic
* Rifleman: Has Optics already
* L-AT: Its just a Rifleman IRL, so he should have optics and would encourage more people for L-AT
* Rifleman UGL: Getting Optics 0.7 i think
* Officer: Kept how he is
* Anti Air: Just a rifleman with a MANPADS, so he should have optics
* Crewman: kept with Iron sights

I hope these are implemented sooner rather than later... :-)
ShowMeTheMonkey
Posts: 33
Joined: 2007-02-11 21:22

Post by ShowMeTheMonkey »

i think this is more a question about balance, while yes pretty much all of British army squaddies are equiped with the SUSAT-16 scope (is that what it's called?) it wouldn;t make the game balanced I think, as brits could out shoot the Chinese fromt he top of the hill by South Bridge on Ghost train.
Image
Longbow*
Posts: 496
Joined: 2007-03-10 03:00

Post by Longbow* »

I think medic should get aimpoint optics , because atm theres nothing to encourage ppl to play medic ( no self heal , no armour , no scope , no fancy assets - just a gun\medkit\defibs )
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

Medics have body armor, its the SF, that doesnt have it :d uh:
Image
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Post by youm0nt »

Longbow* wrote:I think medic should get aimpoint optics , because atm theres nothing to encourage ppl to play medic ( no self heal , no armour , no scope , no fancy assets - just a gun\medkit\defibs )
You can self heal, they have body armor, no scope is not a problem for me because I do better without a scope. The combat medics do have "fancy assets", they have the medic kit, defibrillators, and three field dressings. The combat medic is one of the most important kits for an infantry squad to have. If people aren't choosing the medics to play as, well, tough luck...
([COLOR="Yellow"]o,o)
|)__)[/COLOR]
-"-"-
O RLY?
fuzzhead
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7463
Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42

Post by fuzzhead »

i agree with the Rifleman AA kit, just to make it more attractive. I dont know if i agree with the Light AT kit yet, have to think about it.

those are really your only suggestion lol.. (give rifleman at and rifleman aa optics)
DeePsix
Posts: 2202
Joined: 2007-07-29 19:22

Post by DeePsix »

I do agree with the Light AT fuzz. The kit is honestly under-used and I feel that making them like a normal rifleman would make it more attractive. I think in reality, if a soldier would carry an AT4 he would still carry a scoped weapon. But that is up to you guys and the balance issues.

on a sidenote, I think the MANPADS acronym is the worst the army could choose for their AA launchers
Image
PR Testing Team: Serious Business.
[R-DEV]LeadMagnet: I guess that's what you get when an Irishman drinks light beer.....bad advice.
[R-DEV]dbzao: I'm Oscar Mike, OSCAR MIKE!!!!
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

I would prefer to see the riflemen of all types (including grenadier and rifleman w/ single-shot LAW) get optics, and have optics vary by map. I.e., close-combat sights for urban and densely foliated maps (for the factions that issue them), and telescopic sights for more open maps.
DeePsix wrote:on a sidenote, I think the MANPADS acronym is the worst the army could choose for their AA launchers
Yeah, and to top it all off, they call the HMMWV SHORAD launchers the Avenger Pedestal Mounted Stinger.
GeZe
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3450
Joined: 2006-02-09 22:09

Post by GeZe »

I suggested optics for light AT a while ago on the tester forums. I very much support it. Also give optics to AA kit too.
eddie
Posts: 5495
Joined: 2005-05-09 20:42

Post by eddie »

'[R-DEV wrote:Eddie Baker;458469']Yeah, and to top it all off, they call the HMMWV SHORAD launchers the Avenger Pedestal Mounted Stinger.
:lol: The guy thinking up handy acronyms that day must of been really p*ssed off with his wife.
Image
MrDow123
Posts: 65
Joined: 2007-08-08 17:10

Post by MrDow123 »

Why are iron sights discouraged and Optics emphasized???
Steve: "I've got an M4 attached with an ACOQ Reflex sight, an M203 Grenade Launcher, a 4X power scope, a bipod, a massive night vision scope, a flashlight, a lazer pointer, a suppressor, a drum magazine, and a cappuccino maker"
Dan: "Mhmm, interesting. And how much does the gun weigh? Whats the recoil like? How accurate is it?
Steve: "About 50 pounds, it broke my shoulder when I fired it, and it couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. But it sure looks cool"
OiSkout
Posts: 1294
Joined: 2006-05-14 02:39

Post by OiSkout »

What's the iron sight zoom, 2x? Maybe make it similar to the SF optics?

PS - Medics can't self heal.
Sigless.
GeZe
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3450
Joined: 2006-02-09 22:09

Post by GeZe »

OiSkout wrote:What's the iron sight zoom, 2x? Maybe make it similar to the SF optics?
There is no zoom on ironsights. (well, very slight, maybe like 1.1x to simulate focusing)
OiSkout wrote:
PS - Medics can't self heal.
Actually they can.
eddie
Posts: 5495
Joined: 2005-05-09 20:42

Post by eddie »

MrDow123 wrote:Why are iron sights discouraged and Optics emphasized???
It's realistic. Most British Army troops are equipped with optics unless they shouldn't really be using their L85A2 most of the time (pilots, crewmen). That's what I've gathered anyway.
Image
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Post by ReadMenace »

Eddie's suggestion FTW!

-REad
DeePsix
Posts: 2202
Joined: 2007-07-29 19:22

Post by DeePsix »

Optics on the Rifleman AT kit sounds great on paper, lets just see how it plays out in testing. I cant see it being negative, infact I can see squads carrying them more. It would be nice to see that when i request it that more people are using it. Rather than Rifleman AT Kit [1 of 5]
Image
PR Testing Team: Serious Business.
[R-DEV]LeadMagnet: I guess that's what you get when an Irishman drinks light beer.....bad advice.
[R-DEV]dbzao: I'm Oscar Mike, OSCAR MIKE!!!!
Longbow*
Posts: 496
Joined: 2007-03-10 03:00

Post by Longbow* »

youm0nt wrote: You can self heal, they have body armor, no scope is not a problem for me because I do better without a scope.
You can't heal yourself with medkit , and no scope is a real pain on Kashan , Zatar , Kufrah , Jabal etc. Without a scope medic is close to useless in firefights on those maps .
youm0nt wrote: The combat medics do have "fancy assets", they have the medic kit, defibrillators, and three field dressings.
Does they help with killing enemy?
youm0nt wrote:The combat medic is one of the most important kits for an infantry squad to have.
Yes , but what can force players to choose a kit that has minimum combat capabilities over rifleman , support , etc. ? Medic needs something unique but not very deadly - aimpoint , thats my opinion\suggestion .
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

Give them an aimpoint?
Image

If you are reading this dont stop, cause if you do, I'll kick you in the balls.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”