Barret M4 6.8

MrDow123 · Post by **MrDow123** » 2007-08-15 04:14

I just witnessed the Barret M4 6.8 Cal Assault Rifle on Futurweapons, and I'm really impressed.

It has the accuracy and velocity of the 5.56, but the stopping power of the 7.62. The M4 6.8 is basically the exact same rifle as the M4A1, but it has a larger round for more stopping power.

Will the M4 6.8 ever be featured in Project Reality?

swiftdraw · Post by **swiftdraw** » 2007-08-15 04:17

MrDow123 wrote:I just witnessed the Barret M4 6.8 Cal Assault Rifle on Futurweapons....

And this, my friend, is where you went wrong

ReadMenace · Post by **ReadMenace** » 2007-08-15 04:24

If the US Armed Forces were to adopt the 6.8 SPC, there might be a chance of it in PR.. But I doubt it.

-REad

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-08-15 05:09

Normally i dont get involved in threads like these but DAMN Future Weapons is infected all these people's minds with all these l337 weapons. There probably a least 10 people who have signed up in these forums just to suggest some Future Weapons gun!! The DEVs should pay those guys for bringing these people here.

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2007-08-15 05:30

swiftdraw wrote:And this, my friend, is where you went wrong

Yep, thats where I stopped reading

MrDow123 · Post by **MrDow123** » 2007-08-15 06:15

Whats wrong with Future Weapons?

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-08-15 06:20

MrDow123 wrote:Whats wrong with Future Weapons?

Its filling all your minds with these l337 weapons and then a lot of "you" come here to suggest it. This is Project Reality, not Project l337.

MrDow123 · Post by **MrDow123** » 2007-08-15 06:35

Those weapons are being used in modern warfare. Just because they are "cool" does not mean they are inneffective

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-08-15 06:42

MrDow123 wrote:Those weapons are being used in modern warfare. Just because they are "cool" does not mean they are inneffective

Does the US army use them? Does the US Marine Corps use them? Does any middle eastern country use them(MEC)?Do the PLA use them? Do the Royal Marines or British Army use them? No, NO and no! So im not trying to be mean but what part of Project Reality dont you get??

If any piece of gear or weapon that you see is not being used IN MASS or at least in a decent number by any of the factions in this game, then DONT WASTE YOUR TIME SUGGESTING IT.

That is all.

MrDow123 · Post by **MrDow123** » 2007-08-15 06:43

Wow, don't I feel welcome on these forums

It was just a suggestion, if this is the way im gonna be treated here, than I dont have much point in staying

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-08-15 06:50

MrDow123 wrote:Wow, don't I feel welcome on these forums

It was just a suggestion, if this is the way im gonna be treated here, than I dont have much point in staying

Oh come on man dont be a wuss!!

In your US Army thread in the general forums i was very nice even tho that subject has been beat to death with a dirty old M16A1.

unrealalex · Post by **unrealalex** » 2007-08-15 07:33

A lot of these guys are real current or ex military, not your average joes, so yea you can't expect them all to be touchy-feely and nice =p
Most are though.
I think bad suggestions just get on their nerves. I've made a lot of them myself xD

$kelet0r · Post by **$kelet0r** » 2007-08-15 09:32

A word of advice - don't suggest ideas brought up on children's entertainment TV aka Futureweapons.

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-08-15 09:55

Future Weapons should be wordfiltered, together with fastroping and hovercrafts

JDFryer · Post by **JDFryer** » 2007-08-15 12:36

MrDow123 wrote:Wow, don't I feel welcome on these forums

It was just a suggestion, if this is the way im gonna be treated here, than I dont have much point in staying

Sorry you feel like that. Its just that a lot of people read these forums daily and they form the lifeblood of PR. They also read 5-10 Suggestions every day and of those most will be completely unrealistic or have been already suggested.

When you have read your way through a thread and you have worked out its not going to happen, a lot of people just end up pissed off and post accordingly. That isn't all of us. Some of us are actually tolerant

Welcome to the forums and welcome to PR

El_Vikingo · Post by **El_Vikingo** » 2007-08-15 13:42

Unless a faction currently uses it, I highly doubt that PR will implement it.

WAT IS WRUNG WIT FUTURE WEPONS? I MAKE MY SKOOL PROJECT ON TEH GUNZ!

mammikoura · Post by **mammikoura** » 2007-08-15 13:52

swiftdraw wrote:And this, my friend, is where you went wrong

hahah, exactly.

And the reason why some are not so friendly is that we get this kind of suggestions like every week. I'm sure you would get frustrated at some point too.

Severloh · Post by **Severloh** » 2007-08-15 14:00

hey c'mon I saw a Laser Gun other day on future weapons, let the PLA have it, what's the problem with that

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-08-15 14:01

Severloh wrote:hey c'mon I saw a Laser Gun other day on future weapons, let the PLA have it, what's the problem with that

The fact that the PLA and PAP actually do have a "laser blinding weapon" for use in crowd control is beside the point...

Long Bow · Post by **Long Bow** » 2007-08-15 14:05

El_Vikingo wrote:
WAT IS WRUNG WIT FUTURE WEPONS? I MAKE MY SKOOL PROJECT ON TEH GUNZ!

Is this your 3rd or fourth go at grade 7, I lost track?