Tank Defensive Smoke Screen Suggestions

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Tank Defensive Smoke Screen Suggestions

Post by nedlands1 »

Firstly, I would like to say that this is not a thread about how the developers should implement an ATGM system which is not unlike the AA missile/flares system currently on the aircraft in this mod. This thread is on the issue of smoke screen production and placement.

In real life there are three main systems to produce smoke screens on a tank. All of these systems, to the best of wikipedia and other informative website's knowledge, are implemented on the tanks of the conventional armies which feature in this mod. Firstly there are generally two sets of smoke grenades launchers placed at the 11 and 2 o'clock positions on the turret. These traverse with the turret itself. They normally have five or six smoke grenades in each bank of launchers. They work by firing of a salvo of smoke grenades in the general direction that the turret is facing. This, in theory, creates a opaque smoke screen between the threat and the tank itself, allowing the tank to either escape or flush out the enemy. Secondly there is a smoke generator on the tank which creates a dense smoke cloud around the tank itself. This cloud is created by burning engine fuel at a rapid rate. Thirdly there is a set of smoke producing rounds for the main cannons of most, if not all, of these tanks. It creates a cloud of smoke at the point of impact.

Currently smoke is produced in a rapidly expanding cloud around the tank when the necessary button is pressed by the driver. What I suggest is that the driver has control of a fuel-burning smoke generator which produces smoke around the tank on demand. This should act like the current smoke cloud produced but should be continuously produced when activated. This may cause lag so the smoke cloud could be smaller or have a cool-down timer not unlike the machine guns. The gunner would have control of the smoke grenades which would act like two sets of fixed angle mortars. They would shoot alternating smoke grenades or two at once. The rounds should probably be set to land ~50m away from the tank and slightly to the left or right of the barrel, depending on which launcher they originated from. The gunner could also have a third tank round which would be a smoke round. It would detonate on impact, instantaneously forming a dense cloud of smoke.
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Post by nedlands1 »

BTW, flying, T-90, easter egg, tank ftw...

Image

Or just IRL lag...
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

t90s has more defensive system , like shtora-1(the model ingame has it) and ARENA (not ingame :P ) . shtora can defead incoming missils by confusing their electronics , causing a no hit . ARENA can destroy missils flying , but is in test .

also, type99s has a laser thing that can blind the operador and the launch system of ATGM .
AnRK
Posts: 2136
Joined: 2007-03-27 14:17

Post by AnRK »

I know most of the systems are probably fairly complex to implement, but wouldn't smoke rounds be fairly easy to do? Easy in the context of coding the laborious engine of BF2 of course :p

All of the other ideas would be nice to see in game but a pain in the arse to code I would of thought.

By the way how do BF2 flares work? I haven't paid enough attention to them in action cos I hardly ever fly (It's bad for the environment m'kay ;-) ) but do they actually distract missiles or just locks? Perhaps the code could be exploited for this purpose?
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Post by Rudd »

If its like in bf2 i think they distract theh missles, any1 remember TKing with the USS Essex's defence minigun?
Image
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Post by youm0nt »

Speaking of smoke grenades and tanks, would it be possible to disallow spotting enemies, tanks, etc through smoke? What's the point of smoke if you can get spotted through the smoke and players can just blind fire in the direction infantry players are in and you show up on the minimap?
([COLOR="Yellow"]o,o)
|)__)[/COLOR]
-"-"-
O RLY?
Vaiski
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 894
Joined: 2006-07-17 23:29

Post by Vaiski »

AnRK wrote:I know most of the systems are probably fairly complex to implement, but wouldn't smoke rounds be fairly easy to do? Easy in the context of coding the laborious engine of BF2 of course :p
Yes it should be fairly easy to implement once the effect is done. I’d say it’s more of a prioritizing issue.

I did a smoke screen effect test few months ago (for 0.4 IIRC). It looked lame so it wasn’t implemented. I was going to make a better one some day but there was always some higher priority texturing tasks. Eventually the effect was just forgotten or something.

Katarn has done some neat effects lately. Maybe he makes a proper smoke screen some day ;)
Image
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Post by nedlands1 »

Yay for thread revivals! Is there any plans to do the things I described a month ago?
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

Speaking of smoke grenades and tanks, would it be possible to disallow spotting enemies, tanks, etc through smoke? What's the point of smoke if you can get spotted through the smoke and players can just blind fire in the direction infantry players are in and you show up on the minimap?
true but just use the list of keys for something else. And the tank smoke screen does nothing because it does not fill in right around the tank. Leaves a tank outline and its like yelling "HIT ME HIT ME!"
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Post by nedlands1 »

Update: Fark it I'll do it myself. The results: YouTube - M250 Smoke Grenade Launchers. Also, the USMC official Tank Commander's Handbook which details the M250 grenade launcher's payload and salvo pattern: http://www.mcwl.quantico.usmc.mil/file_ ... NDBOOK.pdf
BloodBane611
Posts: 6576
Joined: 2007-11-14 23:31

Post by BloodBane611 »

For the record, that's frickin cool. It also fits much better with the idea of a smoke grenade launcher. Right now smoke can only be used defensively, and you are caught in you own smoke when using it. I like the idea of driver and gunner controlled smoke.
[R-CON]creepin - "because on the internet 0=1"
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Post by nedlands1 »

Yeah, I was thinking a gunner controlled smoke grenade launcher, not unlike mine and the current some system for the driver (which could produce black smoke to represent the smoke-making device in the engine which presumably burns oil). Maybe another smoke cannon round too but I'm easy going.
Masaq
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 10043
Joined: 2006-09-23 16:29

Post by Masaq »

That's *very* nifty, I like that a lot. Might help encourage infantry to move up in support of tanks instead of having them run around by themselves on the edges of cities. Good to see them closer up and properly supported.

Adding a main-gun launched smoke round would also be pretty good - would enable smoke to be deployed from range. I'd even suggest that a commander-placed marker (Smoke Required Here!) as was added for CAS in 0.7 would be useful...

"That's how it starts, Mas, with that warm happy feeling inside. Pretty soon you're rocking in the corner, a full grown dog addict, wondering where your next St Bernand is coming from..." - IAJTHOMAS
"Did they say what he's angry about?" asked Annette Mitchell, 77, of the district, stranded after seeing a double feature of "Piranha 3D" and "The Last Exorcism." - Washington Post
ZaZZo
Posts: 1494
Joined: 2007-02-03 18:37

Post by ZaZZo »

Awesomeness :D
fuzzhead
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7463
Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42

Post by fuzzhead »

nedlands1 - please xfire me asap

xfire - fuzzhead
Gyberg
Posts: 709
Joined: 2006-08-04 23:36

Post by Gyberg »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tllB1HpJM2k[/youtube]

At 6 minutes a smokescreen is deployed...

BTW: Really nice work nedlands
Image
Anthony Lloyd, himself a former soldier in the British army and a Northern Ireland and Gulf War veteran:
"The men inside (the APC) might have been UN but they were playing by a completely different set of rules. They were Swedes; in terms of individual intelligence, integrity and single-mindedness I was to find them among the most impressive soldiers I had ever encountered. In Vares their moment had come."
VipersGhost
Posts: 1171
Joined: 2007-03-27 18:34

Post by VipersGhost »

I'm no expert on the idea but hows about we R-CON Nedlands1 and Jonny...then sick them on projects like this AND more importantly the weapon deviation stuff?? They are both involved with the code already and have done a bit of research.
All you twats starting said threads "WTFBBQSAUCE 0.7 BLOWS" - R-Dev Jaymz
dbzao
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9381
Joined: 2006-06-08 19:13

Post by dbzao »

nedlands1 wrote:Update: Fark it I'll do it myself.
That's the spirit ;) The community should get more involved. :)
Nickbond592
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 2713
Joined: 2007-01-30 18:16

Post by Nickbond592 »

very nice work there mate, deffinatly worth a shout for [R-CON]
Image


Smeg: Fuzz commands a lot and promotes good teamwork, db flips vehicles, Bosco is an all-round nub, Outlawz is an SP whore, Nickbond is a friggin ninja and Rhino gets kicked for being a n00b.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”