map size

maz.uk · Post by **maz.uk** » 2007-09-23 07:37

hi all wots going on with the maps please please please think about the smaller servers ie 32 slot you guys do a great job but your going way to big for us smaller clans or servers yes you do cut some maps down to 16 but they have 4 flags and the game starts with 2 of them as main ,we need vehicals and more flags mestia is a great size for 32 slots,lots of flags and use of vehicals squads arnt falling over each other like on 64 servers, and you can set rally points in good places , rally points 100 meters from a flag should be changed ie smaller map closer settings, look at ejod 16 or phoenix great infanty maps but every man and his dog can find the rally points as they can only go in a couple of good places now its 100 meters.
dont get me wrong not bitchin just trying to say big isnt good for every one ,medium size maps with use of vehicals would be nice again we all miss them maps, good mass battles with out walking ten mins to get there

Expendable Grunt · Post by **Expendable Grunt** » 2007-09-23 10:41

I'm lost. I thought this was an English-speaking forum?

gazzthompson · Post by **gazzthompson** » 2007-09-23 12:42

Expendable Grunt wrote:I'm lost. I thought this was an English-speaking forum?

im lost i thought you could read english ?

or did i visit the English exam forum again ? man i always get them mixed up.

mabye if i write in no punctuation they cant tell what im saying u guys suck who cares but i guess u cant see this because of the no punctuation and text speak

who need project reality , when you can have project spell check!

And yes i do agree with the topic, maybe there should be two settings , one for 64 which has the 100m RP rule , and one for 16 with has it less ? or is there already ?

maz.uk · Post by **maz.uk** » 2007-09-23 15:26

ha ha makes me laugh guys that criticise for spelling or wot ever stop being a fanny, its a public forum not an english test !!!

pasfreak · Post by **pasfreak** » 2007-09-23 15:48

lol
the original suggestion has nothing to do with this thread at all!

LtSoucy · Post by **LtSoucy** » 2007-09-24 10:05

ya title and post are nothing like each ofther but in the post i get what u said about the RP's but everything else is fine. Not too many servers ruin a 16 player map.

Harrod200 · Post by **Harrod200** » 2007-09-24 13:30

Can we get back to original topic?

As far as I can understand, he is suggesting the minimum deployment distance for RP's (currently 100m) be reduced on smaller maps where the flags are rarely far enough apart, leading to the number of places and RP will go being limited and easily camped.

Personally I like it, so for smaller maps you get RPs closer (50-75m), but for bigger maps retain the 100m. Would allow RP's to be useful on small maps.