Special forces kit.

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
supahpingi
Posts: 1921
Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10

Special forces kit.

Post by supahpingi »

Dunno if already asked but couldnt find anything.
but what will replace the SF kit in 0.7.
its going to be a llimited kit.
but will it get replaced or do whe have to do it with 3 standard kits from then on?
Superior Mind
Posts: 161
Joined: 2007-02-15 01:55

Post by Superior Mind »

I heard that there may be a second version on the rifleman, with no 3x/4x optic but with ammo, and the ammo will be taken away from the regular rifleman kit.
Image
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

^most likely
Image
supahpingi
Posts: 1921
Joined: 2007-05-29 14:10

Post by supahpingi »

Mkay,cool.
and thanx for the fast response!
Superior Mind
Posts: 161
Joined: 2007-02-15 01:55

Post by Superior Mind »

supahpingi wrote:Mkay,cool.
and thanx for the fast response!
Are you by any chance the infamous supah from bf2s?
Image
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Post by youm0nt »

Well, no one said it had to be replaced with another kit... I'd be fine with three base kits for conventional armies anyway.
([COLOR="Yellow"]o,o)
|)__)[/COLOR]
-"-"-
O RLY?
Eddiereyes909
Posts: 3961
Joined: 2007-06-18 07:17

Post by Eddiereyes909 »

what happened to the anti personnel guy?
"You know we've had to imagine the war here, and we have imagined that it was being fought by aging men like ourselves. We had forgotten that wars were fought by babies. When I saw those freshly shaved faces, it was a shock "My God, my God?" I said to myself. "It's the Children's Crusade."- Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughter House Five
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

Superior Mind wrote:I heard that there may be a second version on the rifleman, with no 3x/4x optic but with ammo, and the ammo will be taken away from the regular rifleman kit.
Who, other than I, would use it?
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
AnRK
Posts: 2136
Joined: 2007-03-27 14:17

Post by AnRK »

Yeah I sure as hell wouldn't. Still don't get why MGers get an ammo bag either.
SGT.JOKER
Posts: 1014
Joined: 2007-03-18 17:35

Post by SGT.JOKER »

I didnt know the spec ops kit was going to be replaced.....oh all those good times of CQB with the trusty M4 that ill never have again,alas it will be missed :35_rip:
SGT.JOKER>FTW<(Fight To Win) In Game
Just getting back in the game :mrgreen:
Riflemen, SAW Gunner, Grenaider.
Image
Image
Eddiereyes909
Posts: 3961
Joined: 2007-06-18 07:17

Post by Eddiereyes909 »

Honestly,

How many times do you guys need ammo as an infantryman (excluding, AT,HAT,Sniper, and all other reserved kits and the Uber 1337 spec ops)

me maybe 2 or 3 times at the most in a given day.

then again maybe i just suck! :cry:
"You know we've had to imagine the war here, and we have imagined that it was being fought by aging men like ourselves. We had forgotten that wars were fought by babies. When I saw those freshly shaved faces, it was a shock "My God, my God?" I said to myself. "It's the Children's Crusade."- Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughter House Five
Kenny
Posts: 261
Joined: 2006-11-18 03:30

Post by Kenny »

I don't use the spec Ops that much only in CQC but I would love to see him get a parachute so he can be turned into as sort of SAS guy when his skill are needed.To prevent people from jumping of buildings too many times make him have only one parachute(if it's possible).
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

Kenny wrote:I don't use the spec Ops that much only in CQC but I would love to see him get a parachute so he can be turned into as sort of SAS guy when his skill are needed.To prevent people from jumping of buildings too many times make him have only one parachute(if it's possible).
The new chute system stops that actually.
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

Kenny wrote:I don't use the spec Ops that much only in CQC but I would love to see him get a parachute so he can be turned into as sort of SAS guy when his skill are needed.To prevent people from jumping of buildings too many times make him have only one parachute(if it's possible).
Not possible, that's why they don't have a parachute. And for various other reasons.

Search YouTube for PR 0.4 videos, where SF had a parachute, it's worse than vBF2 with all the Sp3c 0P nerds constantly parachuting down on you.
Image
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

Oh yes..

Spec Op kit will be LIMITED, not removed, thereby forcing people to use it as the kit name suggest - not being z0mgwtfpwn point men constantly prone diving and getting shot due no body armor.
Image
Kenny
Posts: 261
Joined: 2006-11-18 03:30

Post by Kenny »

Expendable Grunt wrote:The new chute system stops that actually.
Do you mean it stops the Parachutes completely or that you can only use them once?
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

Kenny wrote:Do you mean it stops the Parachutes completely or that you can only use them once?
If you leap from a building and pull the chute, you still die.
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
Superior Mind
Posts: 161
Joined: 2007-02-15 01:55

Post by Superior Mind »

Expendable Grunt wrote:Who, other than I, would use it?
Me.
Image
Farks
Posts: 2069
Joined: 2007-01-20 00:08

Post by Farks »

What about a scout instead for spec-ops?
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”