EJOD Desert: Brit vs MEC

.Intense · Post by **.Intense** » 2008-01-23 22:31

There aren't many USMC maps in PR much less with that change. 2 Maps that I am 100% sure, Kashan and Operation Phoenix. I mean hell, the US may not be a favorite right now in real world but I refuse to play British maps because I am biased. I hope there are more plans for USMC vs in the future as if this steady EU exclusivity in PR is getting to be quite honestly, a load of shit.

I am sure there are others out there that feel the same way and I am honestly getting tired of the British kits when they should be US such as EJOD Desert. Maybe Im just being finicky but I think the US needs to have just as many maps as the British do.

--EDIT--

I wanted to correct a mistake on the Subject line as EJOD is US vs MEC... but it really does seem that PR is slowly becoming Brit vs All now-a-days.

SiN|ScarFace · Post by **SiN|ScarFace** » 2008-01-23 22:40

Coughusarmycough. Sit tight.

Sturnn · Post by **Sturnn** » 2008-01-23 22:44

Even though im a pro british kind of guy, i still think PR is lacking USMC involvement etc...even though i love that PR has the british in it....i still like playing as the americans too, and im british! lol.

SiN|ScarFace · Post by **SiN|ScarFace** » 2008-01-23 22:46

PR needs more maps, esp insurgency maps.

ConscriptVirus · Post by **ConscriptVirus** » 2008-01-23 22:51

id like more USMC. (mainly cuz im in US and not UK)

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2008-01-23 22:55

British maps are fun to play on, which is why they are played more often than USMC maps. Because of this, it feels like there is a lack of USMC maps although they have 2 more than the UK forces.

3 USMC maps that I don't like to play are on: Daqing Oilfields, Gulf of Oman WAC, and Hills of Hamyong, which is about 30% (I think?) of the USMC maps. But hey, if you want more, why not start and create a map which, if done well, will hopefully appear in PR.

Razick · Post by **Razick** » 2008-01-23 23:04

Well right now there are 10 US maps and 8 british maps but the problem is that half of the US maps are total **** and the majority of the british are well designed maps. They are from older releases and do not fit the type of play that PR has now evolved to. One very good example of this is Hills of Hamyong. This map is a hunk of hot shit in 0.7 and the play is pretty stale and way to gamey and the list just goes on. I just hope some of these maps get worked on the next release because they are now in dire need of tweaks.

Razick · Post by **Razick** » 2008-01-23 23:08

Jonny wrote:Is it just me or is this thread following the exact same path as one that already exists?

Agreed. time to closeth the threadeth

[uBp]Irish · Post by **[uBp]Irish** » 2008-01-23 23:12

SiN|ScarFace wrote:PR needs more maps, esp insurgency maps.

agree.

that statement owns this thread.

Symplify · Post by **Symplify** » 2008-01-23 23:17

.Intense wrote:There aren't many USMC maps in PR much less with that change. 2 Maps that I am 100% sure, Kashan and Operation Phoenix. I mean hell, the US may not be a favorite right now in real world but I refuse to play British maps because I am biased. I hope there are more plans for USMC vs in the future as if this steady EU exclusivity in PR is getting to be quite honestly, a load of shit.

I am sure there are others out there that feel the same way and I am honestly getting tired of the British kits when they should be US such as EJOD Desert. Maybe Im just being finicky but I think the US needs to have just as many maps as the British do.

Wow, second nationalistic American in a week to complain about teh Brtiz haz moar maps then tha Amercans!

10 US, 8 British, 3 more US in the wings and the US Army. Quit whining.

icehollow · Post by **icehollow** » 2008-01-23 23:47

Symplify wrote:Wow, second nationalistic American in a week to complain about teh Brtiz haz moar maps then tha Amercans!

10 US, 8 British, 3 more US in the wings and the US Army. Quit whining.

How do you know he is American? Quit assuming. My point being is I'm sure as hell not American but I'm sick of all the Brit maps. Way overplayed in 0.6.

Besides, everyone, EVERYONE loves ACOGs. That's a fact of the universe.

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2008-01-23 23:52

Well, while we're at it, more MEC, PLA, Insurgent, and Milita maps please! (I'm kidding

)

BloodBane611 · Post by **BloodBane611** » 2008-01-24 01:03

Not happy with what you have? Fire up the BF2 editor and make a new map!

It's simple (so you think).

Anyhow, my point is, stop being up the DEVs butts about who plays what map. Just strap on some gear and kill people, it doesn't matter what team you play.

Teek · Post by **Teek** » 2008-01-24 02:25

more usmc assult maps in 0.8 and US army. (although I dont think they will have too many maps). If Dfox can get some stuff together then there could be Canadians.

Sturnn · Post by **Sturnn** » 2008-01-24 02:51

Actually, on 2nd thoughts i totally agree with BloodBane611 doesn't matter what team your on, at least your killing people!.

besides, name one game where the british are the main good guys or something..and hardly any usa involvement?.

fludblud · Post by **fludblud** » 2008-01-24 04:58

we should have a USMC vs GB map just to appease everyone!

markonymous · Post by **markonymous** » 2008-01-24 06:32

enough with the changing american to British.