Should SAW kits get a ACOG or Aimpoint Scope?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Locked
CanuckCommander
Posts: 431
Joined: 2008-03-19 02:25

Should SAW kits get a ACOG or Aimpoint Scope?

Post by CanuckCommander »

It is most realistic to have a scope for SAW (Squad Automatic Weapons) kits for all modern armies. Though maybe on some maps that stress CQB, the scope can be removed. Some of you might argue that this poses as a balancing issue since SAW guns are already too powerful. There are disadvantages that come with scopes. Namely, the increased recoil while looking through a magnified image.

Opionions? P.S. this is my first post here! Saying hello from Canada EH!

Image


WOOT!canadian C9 with scope. Note that most Canadian issued rifles come with standard scopes. GO CANADA!

Image
PRC_Heavy_Z
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1088
Joined: 2007-02-25 22:56

Post by PRC_Heavy_Z »

Welcome to the forums :)
This topic has been discussed before :)
remember to use the search function :)
I Do like the idea though.
Cyrax-Sektor
Posts: 1030
Joined: 2007-10-15 21:12

Post by Cyrax-Sektor »

Wow, scoped SAWs do look great, but I'd see more SAW snipers personally. :/
[uBp]Irish
Posts: 1794
Joined: 2007-01-17 23:47

Post by [uBp]Irish »

you're going to get people crying about balance, when really PR should be where the coalition forces should win unless totally over-ran by better strategies.

Aimpoint yes, should have same magnification as ironsights. Acog no.
Image
nedlands1
Posts: 1467
Joined: 2006-05-28 09:50

Post by nedlands1 »

Too much work for something people on the receiving end will ***** about IMHO. Already suggested too.
Image
HughJass
Posts: 2599
Joined: 2007-10-14 03:55

Post by HughJass »

no, because the saw gunner's challange is now no longer one. He is with a scope and automatic sniper. At least now it takes skill and it is really balanced as of now.
Image
zangoo
Posts: 978
Joined: 2007-09-01 03:42

Post by zangoo »

well the canadian forces should get a scope on the saw and most other weapons, but for the other armys i am not sure. i will be some what angry if the canadian forces dont get a scope on the c9, if i can remember right eggman said everything should be made as real as possible and the mappers should balance it out and i agree 100%.
ReaperMAC
Posts: 3055
Joined: 2007-02-11 19:16

Post by ReaperMAC »

If they get any type of scope, the deviation should be extreme as they are meant to suppress the enemy, in-game atleast.
Image
PR Test Team: [COLOR="Black"]Serious Business[/COLOR]
[R-DEV]dbzao: My head Rhino.... (long pause) My beautiful head
[R-DEV]Rhino - If you want to spam do it in the tester area please.
Control the Media, Control the Mind.
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 21225
Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32

Post by Rudd »

I would like to see a scope, it might make them less effective at CQB. But wouldn't they have to reskin the m249 and type ?? for the chinese? I think it isn't really a priority since the SAW does its job well already.
Image
OkitaMakoto
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9368
Joined: 2006-05-25 20:57

Post by OkitaMakoto »

Already Suggested Suggestions:
Weapons - m240/M60/M16A4/ACOG Scopes/VSS Vintorez
Suggest you look through it before posting :) EVERYONE needs to, not just you

Welcome to the forums, hope to see you in my squad some time,
Okita
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”